Re: inetd problem: "IPv6 for RPC is not supported yet"

2000-02-01 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
> Apart from disabling INET6 in the inetd build, is there any way of > supressing inetd from trying to bind v6 services? I like using rup > on the internal network, but it's not working on my latest-sup-current. Sorry for your problem and please try this patch. Now I am waiting to get commit perm

Re: inetd problem

1999-02-13 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Matthew Dillon: > strings /usr/sbin/inetd | fgrep Id ident(1) is your friend :-) /usr/sbin/inetd: $Id: inetd.c,v 1.46 1999/01/05 11:56:35 danny Exp $ -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #69:

Re: inetd problem

1999-02-13 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> dying daemons bug. There have been two attemps to fix the inetd bug: :> one by Matt Dillon in rev. 1.42 and 1.43, and one by me (based on :> patches submitted by Graham Wheeler) in rev. 1.44 and 1.45. I haven't :> heard any complaints about the inetd bug lately, so I'll tentatively :> postulate

Re: inetd problem

1999-02-13 Thread N
On 8 Jan 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >>> Can anyone tell me if the inetd realloc (and other) problems have been >>> fixed yet? Searching Deja News shows conflicting reports. I checked >>> the current diffs, and built version 1.46 - is this a safe version to >>> use? It's been running on my