Martin Blapp wrote:
> > Not help, but a question:
> >
> > If openoffice compiles with ports' version of gcc?
> > And if it runs compiled this way?
>
> unfortunatly not. The build segfaults in a different way. I'll upgrade the port
> to the latedt build tomorrow. Let's see if it builds now properl
> With gcc3.1 on -CURRENT, or with gcc3.1 on -STABLE?
Both :)
martin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hello, Martin Blapp!
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 06:38:20PM +0100, you wrote:
> > If openoffice compiles with ports' version of gcc?
> > And if it runs compiled this way?
>
> unfortunatly not. The build segfaults in a different way. I'll upgrade the port
> to the latedt build tomorrow. Let's see if
Hi,
> Not help, but a question:
>
> If openoffice compiles with ports' version of gcc?
> And if it runs compiled this way?
unfortunatly not. The build segfaults in a different way. I'll upgrade the port
to the latedt build tomorrow. Let's see if it builds now properly with
gcc3.1
Martin
To
Hello, Martin Blapp!
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:10:58AM +0100, you wrote:
> It looks like our modified FreeBSD GCC breaks the STLport tests,
> as it breaks OpenOffice too.
>
> If one uses a normal unmodified stock gcc version (gcc 2.95.2 or
> 2.95.3), and compiles it on STABLE or CURRENT, the c
