Re: freebsd-update 12.3 to 14.0RC1 takes 12-24 hours (block cloning regression)

2023-10-18 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2023-10-17 09:40:37, Kevin Bowling wrote: The flash SLOG system took around 12 hours to complete freebsd-update from 13.2 to 14.0-RC1. The system without the SLOG took nearly 24 hours. This was the result of ~50k patches, and ~10k files from freebsd-update and a very pathological 'install'

RE: freebsd-update 12.3 to 14.0RC1 takes 12-24 hours (block cloning regression)

2023-10-17 Thread Mark Millard
Kevin Bowling wrote on Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:40:37 UTC : > I have two systems with a zpool 2x2 mirror on 7.2k RPM disks. One > system also has a flash SLOG. > > The flash SLOG system took around 12 hours to complete freebsd-update > from 13.2 to 14.0-RC1. The system without the SLOG took nea

Re: freebsd-update(8) without an echo of "You must be root to run this."

2021-02-19 Thread Chris Rees
Hey, On 16 February 2021 08:53:29 GMT, Graham Perrin wrote: > > >         echo "You must be root to run this." > >Below: is this my PEBKAM, or (with a system that is preco

Re: Freebsd-update

2020-07-27 Thread Chris
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:49:46 -0700 bsd-li...@bsdforge.com said On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:14:49 -0700 Michael Dexter edi...@callfortesting.org said > On 7/17/20 4:37 AM, Cristian Cardoso wrote: > > I would like to know if by chance in freeBSD there is some kind of log > > when the command freebsd-u

Re: Freebsd-update

2020-07-27 Thread Chris
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:14:49 -0700 Michael Dexter edi...@callfortesting.org said On 7/17/20 4:37 AM, Cristian Cardoso wrote: > I would like to know if by chance in freeBSD there is some kind of log > when the command freebsd-update fetch / install is executed? > I looked in the documentation and

Re: Freebsd-update

2020-07-27 Thread Michael Dexter
On 7/17/20 4:37 AM, Cristian Cardoso wrote: I would like to know if by chance in freeBSD there is some kind of log when the command freebsd-update fetch / install is executed? I looked in the documentation and found nothing about it. There does not appear to be a log but running it with '--debu

Re: freebsd-update: to a specific patch level - help please? [PATCH]

2018-04-01 Thread Derek (freebsd lists)
On 18-03-24 10:26 AM, Derek wrote: On 18-03-23 06:44 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: To be clear, *I've included a link to a patch to freebsd-update in my initial post, and the help I'm looking for: is to get this functionality added as a feature so others can benefit.*  It works for me already, and I've

Re: freebsd-update: to a specific patch level - help please? [PATCH]

2018-03-24 Thread Derek
On 18-03-23 06:44 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! To be clear, *I've included a link to a patch to freebsd-update in my initial post, and the help I'm looking for: is to get this functionality added as a feature so others can benefit.* It works for me already, and I've already benefited. (I'm happ

Re: freebsd-update: to a specific patch level - help please? [PATCH]

2018-03-23 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > To be clear, *I've included a link to a patch to freebsd-update > in my initial post, and the help I'm looking for: is to get this > functionality added as a feature so others can benefit.* It > works for me already, and I've already benefited. > > (I'm happy to flesh it out, and docume

Re: freebsd-update: to a specific patch level - help please? [PATCH]

2018-03-23 Thread Derek (freebsd lists)
On 18-03-21 05:24 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: Am 21.03.2018 um 22:12 schrieb Derek (freebsd lists) <48225...@razorfever.net>: Hi! I was surprised when using freebsd-update, that there was no way to specify a patch level. AFAIK, the usual answer to these kinds of requests is: „Run your own fre

Re: freebsd-update: to a specific patch level - help please?

2018-03-21 Thread Rainer Duffner
> Am 21.03.2018 um 22:12 schrieb Derek (freebsd lists) > <48225...@razorfever.net>: > > Hi! > > I was surprised when using freebsd-update, that there was no way to specify a > patch level. AFAIK, the usual answer to these kinds of requests is: „Run your own freebsd-update server“. Mirror

Re: freebsd-update install failed

2014-10-24 Thread RW
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:23:00 +0200 d...@gmx.com wrote: > Allan Jude wrote on 10/24/2014 18:29: > > Do you have a src tree installed? > > Obviously not. It's not at all obvious. > > caused by it trying to install the update to an > > empty src tree, so the contrib/tzdata parent directory does n

Re: freebsd-update install failed

2014-10-24 Thread dt71
Allan Jude wrote on 10/24/2014 18:29: Do you have a src tree installed? Obviously not. This error is usually Usually? You've gotta be kidding me. caused by it trying to install the update to an empty src tree, so the contrib/tzdata parent directory does not exist. It is a minor problem w

Re: freebsd-update install failed

2014-10-24 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-10-24 12:23, d...@gmx.com wrote: > d...@gmx.com wrote on 10/24/2014 04:09: >> # freebsd-update install >> Installing updates...install: ///usr/src/contrib/tzdata/zone1970.tab: >> No such file or directory >> done. >> # > > OK, maybe the install didn't fail, and the quirk is ignorable. >

Re: freebsd-update install failed

2014-10-24 Thread dt71
d...@gmx.com wrote on 10/24/2014 04:09: # freebsd-update install Installing updates...install: ///usr/src/contrib/tzdata/zone1970.tab: No such file or directory done. # OK, maybe the install didn't fail, and the quirk is ignorable. However, in any case, freebsd-update shouldn't try to updat

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-30 Thread RW
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:07:26 +0100 Lars Engels wrote: > > FWIW, the performance problems with proxies are limited to HTTP > > proxies which don't speak HTTP/1.1. > > Are you sure? > I just tried it manually with telnet: > ... > IIUC the proxy itself supports HTTP/1.1 but not the webserver behind

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-30 Thread Lars Engels
Am 2014-01-29 22:51, schrieb Colin Percival: On 01/29/14 12:51, Lars Engels wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:11:04AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 5:32, Lars Engels wrote: Also using freebsd-update behind a proxy is really slow. Even with a very fast internet connection (

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-29 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Lars Engels wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:11:04AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 5:32, Lars Engels wrote: >>> >>> >>> Also using freebsd-update behind a proxy is really slow. Even with a >>> very fast internet connection (norma

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-29 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 25.01.2014 um 16:11 schrieb Mark Felder : > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 5:32, Lars Engels wrote: >> >> >> Also using freebsd-update behind a proxy is really slow. Even with a >> very fast internet connection (normally download rates ca. 3 MBytes / s) >> downloading all the tiny binary dif

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-29 Thread Colin Percival
On 01/29/14 14:26, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 29 January 2014 13:51, Colin Percival wrote: >> FWIW, the performance problems with proxies are limited to HTTP proxies >> which don't speak HTTP/1.1. > > Did you / others ever actually benchmark this? The fact that performance sucks when proxies break

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-29 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 29 January 2014 13:51, Colin Percival wrote: > On 01/29/14 12:51, Lars Engels wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:11:04AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 5:32, Lars Engels wrote: Also using freebsd-update behind a proxy is really slow. Even with a very fast int

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-29 Thread Colin Percival
On 01/29/14 12:51, Lars Engels wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:11:04AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 5:32, Lars Engels wrote: >>> Also using freebsd-update behind a proxy is really slow. Even with a >>> very fast internet connection (normally download rates ca. 3 MBytes

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-29 Thread Lars Engels
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:11:04AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 5:32, Lars Engels wrote: > > > > > > Also using freebsd-update behind a proxy is really slow. Even with a > > very fast internet connection (normally download rates ca. 3 MBytes / s) > > downloading all

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-25 Thread Mark Felder
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 5:32, Lars Engels wrote: > > > Also using freebsd-update behind a proxy is really slow. Even with a > very fast internet connection (normally download rates ca. 3 MBytes / s) > downloading all the tiny binary diff files took more than 8 hours. > Maybe freebsd-update's b

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-25 Thread Lars Engels
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:40:44PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2014-01-21 15:42, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:46:37 am David Chisnall wrote: > >>> On 21 Jan 2014, at 07:13, Antonio Olivares > >> wrote: > >

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-24 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 1/24/2014 11:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote: I agree with the rest of this thread. This is just awful. I'm basically forced to do source based updates when jumping major versions because freebsd-update is a nightmare to use. I've yet to go through a freebsd-update process that didn't require a ma

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-24 Thread olli hauer
On 2014-01-24 20:31, Mark Felder wrote: > I agree with the rest of this thread. This is just awful. I'm basically > forced to do source based updates when jumping major versions because > freebsd-update is a nightmare to use. Not tested, but maybe this works. a) use etcmerge before freebsd-upgrad

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-24 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-01-21 15:42, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:46:37 am David Chisnall wrote: >>> On 21 Jan 2014, at 07:13, Antonio Olivares >> wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Ivan Voras >> wrote: > Hi, >

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-24 Thread Mark Felder
I agree with the rest of this thread. This is just awful. I'm basically forced to do source based updates when jumping major versions because freebsd-update is a nightmare to use. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-21 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:46:37 am David Chisnall wrote: > > > > On 21 Jan 2014, at 07:13, Antonio Olivares > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Ivan Voras > wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Is there any way I can avoid

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-21 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:46:37 am David Chisnall wrote: > > On 21 Jan 2014, at 07:13, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there any way I can avoid manually resolving hundreds of merge > >> conflicts of the following typ

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-21 Thread David Chisnall
On 21 Jan 2014, at 07:13, Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any way I can avoid manually resolving hundreds of merge >> conflicts of the following type while using freebsd-update ? >> >> 1 <<< current version >> >> >> 2

Re: freebsd-update

2014-01-21 Thread Antonio Olivares
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any way I can avoid manually resolving hundreds of merge > conflicts of the following type while using freebsd-update ? > > 1 <<< current version > > > 2 # $FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/etc/csh.cshrc 50472 1999-08-27 23:37:10Z

Re: freebsd-update not checking disk space?

2011-10-25 Thread Colin Percival
On 10/25/11 00:52, René Ladan wrote: > I tried to upgrade a server at work from 8.2-RELEASE-i386 to 9.0-RC1-i386 > using freebsd-update.When running 'freebsd-update install' to install the new > kernel, but that failed because there was insufficient disk space. This > resulted > in freebsd-update