On 12-Mar-2003 Derek Tattersall wrote:
> * Jonathan Lemon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030312 01:12]:
>> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:59:15 -0600 (CST)
>> From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PRO
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Derek Tattersall wrote:
> > Mar 10 20:55:09 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
> > non-sleepablelocks held:
>
> The only malloc of 64 bytes in this code path should be the
> transient template structure malloc (FWIW).
>
> John: did you look at my patch for t
Derek Tattersall wrote:
> Mar 10 20:55:09 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following non-sleepablelocks
> held:
The only malloc of 64 bytes in this code path should be the
transient template structure malloc (FWIW).
John: did you look at my patch for the locking?
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe
* Jonathan Lemon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030312 01:12]:
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:59:15 -0600 (CST)
> From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: exclusive sleep mutex netisr...
>
In article you write:
>I see several instances of this in /var/log/messages after cvsup'ing
>Monday evening and rebuilding world and kernel. I haven't seen any
>messages about this, so I figured I'd ask here.
>
>Message:
>Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
>non-slee
Derek Tattersall wrote:
> I see several instances of this in /var/log/messages after cvsup'ing
> Monday evening and rebuilding world and kernel. I haven't seen any
> messages about this, so I figured I'd ask here.
>
> Message:
> Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
>
