In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David W. Chapman Jr."
writes:
>On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:24PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
>>
>> If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a "real" one; it's
>> also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your
>> disks up).
>>
>I have
From: Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: diskcheckd is poo
Date: Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:24PM -0700
> If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a "real" one; it's
> also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your
> disks up).
midas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 2:49 AM
Subject: Re: diskcheckd is poo
> From: Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: diskcheckd is poo
> Date: Fri, Aug 24
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:24PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a "real" one; it's
> also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your
> disks up).
>
I have the shar of the port up at
http://people.freebsd.org:~/dwcjr/diskcheck
If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a "real" one; it's
also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your
disks up).
If we're going to keep it, it should be turned off by default at any rate.
> diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:51:41PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> Here is a shar of what I am working on. Comments patches and
> complaints are appreciated. I just have to make the rc script for it
> to startup on boot.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~dwcjr/diskcheckd.shar
> --
Update
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 01:57:15PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:11:00PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > If someone could roll a tarball for me, I could atleast make the
> > skeleton for the port if not finish it off.
>
> We should just repo copy it to ports. S
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:11:00PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> If someone could roll a tarball for me, I could atleast make the
> skeleton for the port if not finish it off.
We should just repo copy it to ports. See how I do the setcdboot port.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To U
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems David O'Brien wrote:
> > diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
> > errors before it is too late. It thinks 40% of my disks are bad (which
> > I don't). I've turned it off, I know many that have.
> >
> > I would
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:07:15PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems David O'Brien wrote:
> > diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
> > errors before it is too late. It thinks 40% of my disks are bad (which
> > I don't). I've turned it off, I know many that ha
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
> diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
> errors before it is too late. It thinks 40% of my disks are bad (which
> I don't). I've turned it off, I know many that have.
>
> I would like to remove it from the base system and put it in p
11 matches
Mail list logo
