On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 06:26 pm, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to modify devd and devctl
for them to handle other events than attaching and detaching devices..
For example, they could be used to mark a network interface as down,
when the network
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 18:49, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > and you cannot tell dhclient that interfaces have arrived.
:
: dhclient(8) seems to think otherwise, although it doesn't explain quite
: how (
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:59:21PM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 18:49, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > and you cannot tell dhclient that interfaces have arrived.
One way for it to tell that this has happened automatically is to get
it to listen on a PF_ROUTE socket and
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 18:49, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> and you cannot tell dhclient that interfaces have arrived.
dhclient(8) seems to think otherwise, although it doesn't explain quite
how (I assume it wants you to pause and resume via OMAPI/omshell(8)
since it doesn't appear to support "interface"
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : That functionality is being ported back to the vendor, if it hasn't b
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : That functionality is being ported back to the vendor, if it hasn't been
> : already. If we want really cool whizbang features that are more specific
> : to us, we
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: That functionality is being ported back to the vendor, if it hasn't been
: already. If we want really cool whizbang features that are more specific
: to us, we _should_ be looking at stuff like devd. The trick is
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Yes. that has been the plan for some time now. However, dhclient is
> really lame in a lot of ways. Martin Blapp has made it a lot better
> of lates. In geral, I tend to believe that I shouldn't fix bugs in
> dhclient with devd things. However, a m
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Suleiman Souhlal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I was wondering if it would be a good idea to modify devd and
: devctl for them to handle other events than attaching and detaching
: devices.. For example, they could be used to mark a network
: interface as
