Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In message Michael Reifenberger
>writes:
> > : Have you tried to start aviplay ( coming from ports/graphics/avifile ) or using
> > : whine?
> >
> > Nope.
>
> vmware does the job too, and I believe star-of
> In message Michael Reifenberger
>writes:
> : Have you tried to start aviplay ( coming from ports/graphics/avifile ) or using
> : whine?
>
> Nope.
vmware does the job too, and I believe star-office.
> Warner
--
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In message Michael Reifenberger writes:
: Have you tried to start aviplay ( coming from ports/graphics/avifile ) or using
: whine?
Nope.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mes
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
...
> : -current is NOT safe, by any stretch of the imagination. Kris K. and I
> : have both posted numerous messages to -current about the problems we're
> : having let me know if you need copies.
>
> I'm not having problems :-). However, I see tha
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:16:46PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > .UPDATING
> > Log:
> > Looks like -current is safe again, and has been since Friday.
Alpha is in evern worse shape than x86. The statement that -current is
safe is 110% wrong.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Barton writes:
: Warner Losh wrote:
: >
: > imp 2001/05/28 21:26:44 PDT
: >
: > Modified files:
: > .UPDATING
: > Log:
: > Looks like -current is safe again, and has been since Friday.
:
: -current is NOT safe, by a
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> imp 2001/05/28 21:26:44 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> Looks like -current is safe again, and has been since Friday.
-current is NOT safe, by any stretch of the imagination. Kris K. and I
have both posted numerou