On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:48:31PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:14:57PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> > > I don't know this is local problem on my environment, but "make
> > > buildworld" with old make(1) failed if I did not
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:14:57PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> > I don't know this is local problem on my environment, but "make
> > buildworld" with old make(1) failed if I did not set MACHINE_CPU in
> > /etc/make.conf. So it seems invoked make(1) in
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:14:57PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> At 20 Feb 2001 07:54:22 GMT,
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > No, MACHINE_CPU is optional. If you don't have it set, you get the
> > vanilla C code. So if you don't have it set at all, you'll get C code
> > in OpenSSL as it's always been, t
At 20 Feb 2001 07:54:22 GMT,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> No, MACHINE_CPU is optional. If you don't have it set, you get the
> vanilla C code. So if you don't have it set at all, you'll get C code
> in OpenSSL as it's always been, then the next time you are using the
> updated make(1) and it will set it
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:02:57AM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Modified files:
>> >share/mk sys.mk
>> > Log:
>> > Remove bogus setting of MACHINE_CPU here. There is n
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:02:57AM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Modified files:
> >share/mk sys.mk
> > Log:
> > Remove bogus setting of MACHINE_CPU here. There is no need for it.
>
> But there MUST be at least on
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Modified files:
>share/mk sys.mk
> Log:
> Remove bogus setting of MACHINE_CPU here. There is no need for it.
But there MUST be at least one setting for
MACHINE_CPU for 'make buildworld' to succeed before new 'make'
with t
