In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site
: and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks
Not really. No differences that are important. (eg, different machine
names, snap
Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site
and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks
Ken
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> > Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snaps
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site
> snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to
> install -CURRENT on one of my machines.
Because it's the only reliable current snapshot buildi
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:32:21AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > Ohhhkay. The .jp site I found stopped making snaps on 6/21. Seeing as
> > current only stabilized in the last day or so, I think first I'll write
> > them and ask if it's going to start b
"David O'Brien" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:48:04PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> > snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org is now becoming too busy ftp site, many
> > connections are rejected because of max connection limit. I'm now
> > seeking donors of network bandwidth and PCs (but I don't know
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:48:04PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org is now becoming too busy ftp site, many
> connections are rejected because of max connection limit. I'm now
> seeking donors of network bandwidth and PCs (but I don't know I can
> find or not). Anyway,
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:32:55PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Are the ftp paths equivalent? I seem to recall that current.freebsd.org
> is referenced in sysinstall. Will just a CNAME work?
ENOCLUE. But does it matter? Either today or w/the CNAME sysinstall is
referenced. The delay in waiting
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:32:21AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Ohhhkay. The .jp site I found stopped making snaps on 6/21. Seeing as
> current only stabilized in the last day or so, I think first I'll write
> them and ask if it's going to start back up again.
They never stopped, `make release'
> > > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > > > is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
> > > > re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new
> > > > one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to kno
"David O'Brien" wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > is that machine dead?
>
> It's dead Jim. I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to CNAME current and
> releng4 to the .jp snap server. Perhaps a reminder to hostmaster by
> someone else would help.
Are the ftp path
chuckr> Ohhhkay. The .jp site I found stopped making snaps on 6/21.
Mainly because kern.flp was flood. Any tiny breakages refuse to make
a distribution.
chuckr> Manfred Antar told me about ftp.kddlabs.co.jp, which is the
chuckr> "good" site.
It mirrors snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org daily, if my l
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > is that machine dead?
>
> It's dead Jim. I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to CNAME current and
> releng4 to the .jp snap server. Perhaps a reminder to hostmaster by
> someone else would help.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> is that machine dead?
It's dead Jim. I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to CNAME current and
releng4 to the .jp snap server. Perhaps a reminder to hostmaster by
someone else would help.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:48:47PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > > is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
> > > re-install (having booting probl
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
> > re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new
> > one, easiest fix is just
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
> re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new
> one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to know where to go for
> a sn
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:39:41AM -0400, Mike wrote:
Hi,
> I have been trying for several days now to access current.freebsd.org so I
> can get the latest -CURRENT snapshot instead of my usual DP1 -> cvsup ->
> buildworld, but I am unable to get in.. Is this not a public server?
There seems
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment?
Hmm...
galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org
Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready.
Name (current.freebsd.org:matusita): ftp
331 Guest login ok, s
will> Jordan announced recently that Qwest is upgrading the hardware
will> and that there would be intermittent problems with the server for
will> a certain period (a few days as I recall).
It would be:
> From: Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: stable.freebsd.org AKA releng4.freebsd
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
> hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to
> load -CURR
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with=20
> current.freebsd.or
This is a different problem. The stable.freebsd.org machine, on which
all the really big NFS storage lives, failed to come back up from a
reboot last night and I'm trying to get it restarted now. The terminal
server also appears to be sick or I'd be able to intervene remotely. :(
- Jordan
>
>
This is a different problem. The stable.freebsd.org machine, on which
all the really big NFS storage lives, failed to come back up from a
reboot last night and I'm trying to get it restarted now. The terminal
server also appears to be sick or I'd be able to intervene remotely. :(
- Jordan
>
>
will> Jordan announced recently that Qwest is upgrading the hardware
will> and that there would be intermittent problems with the server for
will> a certain period (a few days as I recall).
It would be:
> From: Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: stable.freebsd.org AKA releng4.freebsd
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment?
Hmm...
galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org
Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready.
Name (current.freebsd.org:matusita): ftp
331 Guest login ok, s
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
> hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to
> load -CURR
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
> hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to
> l
I did not look at current.FreeBSD.ORG, but at current.jp.FreeBSD.ORG,
the build on the 1st and 2nd October seem to have succeeded.
I tried to install 5.0-CURRENT-20011002-JPSNAP from current.jp.FreeBSD.ORG,
then sysinstall says
mknod of /dev/rad0s1b returned failure status!
and stops at the tim
At Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:54:52 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson wrote:
> current.jp.freebsd.org apparently carries snapshots, although I haven't
> tried it recently.
It's been unable to build a release for the past two weeks since the
release kernel overflows its floppy. The last successful build was
on
current.jp.freebsd.org apparently carries snapshots, although I haven't
tried it recently.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
> ftp -a fails to login to t
First we had hardware problems, then NFS was broken on the cluster for
awhile, preventing current.freebsd.org from getting at the CVS
repository. It's fixed now and I see that a snapshot is building
as we speak.
- Jordan
From: Alexey Zelkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: current.freebsd.org Date:
Thanks, this is my fault too given that I tried to fix it myself
and didn't raise it with you earlier. :(
From: "Mark M. Lutgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: current.freebsd.org down?] (fwd)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:20:55 -0500 (CDT)
> I was
Yes, it is. I'm trying to get it back online but it needs a hard reset
since it's wedged beyond the point where I can do anything useful
from the serial console.
- Jordan
From: John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: current.freebsd.org down?
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
> is curr
-4770
Qwest Internet Solutions | Voice.(612) 664-3332
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:44:13 -0500
From: Pete McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mark Lutgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: current.freebsd.org
Robert Watson wrote:
> The last package build on current.FreeBSD.org seems to be from March 26th.
> Is there any chance we could get an updated package build for -CURRENT?
AFAIK there are some problems with bento's hardware. Contact Satoshi for more
details.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
Jordan:
I can probably help you out. 612.664.3078.
Brett
On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 12:56:32 PST, "Jordan Hubbard" wrote:
>> Not sure if this the right place to complain or not, but
current.freebsd.org
>> does not appear to be on the net. traceroutes to both
current.freebsd.org
>> and usw2.freebsd
> Not sure if this the right place to complain or not, but current.freebsd.org
> does not appear to be on the net. traceroutes to both current.freebsd.org
> and usw2.freebsd.org (its alterego) fail. I did find that ftp7.de.freebsd.or
g
> has the 27 November 2000 snapshot of current on it .. was
matusita> When I backout this change, the problem seems disappeared...
This is sample shell script to reproduce recent kernel hungup:
#!/bin/sh
dd of=/tmp/image if=/dev/zero count=1440 bs=1k
awk 'BEGIN {printf "%c%c", 85, 170}' | \
dd of=/tmp/image obs=1 seek=510 conv=notrunc
vnconfig -s la
jhay> It looks like I spoke too soon. My 2000-10-05 kernel that previously
jhay> worked also now panics. It must be somewhere when the floppies are
jhay> made.
Maybe there is a problem in newfs(8).
peter 2000/10/16 17:41:37 PDT
Modified files:
sbin/newfs mkfs.c
Log:
I
>
> jhay> For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me.
>
> Would you please explain "an older kernel" ? I'm using a kernel as of
> Sep/30/2000 and it panics.
>
> ***
>
> Note that this (Sep/30/2000) kernel doesn't panic until Oct/13/2000.
> Between Oct/14/2000 and Oct/17/2000
>
> $ For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me.
>
> How older is your kernel?
> My kernel build 2000-09-21 JST. It panic when "make release".
Not that old. 2000-10-05. The machine is a dual 266MHz PII. I have
no problem building releases using "NODOC=YES WORLD_FLAGS=-j4" wh
From: John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org problems?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:07:14 +0200 (SAT)
$ For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me.
How older is your kernel?
My kernel build 2000-09-21 JST. It panic when "make release"
jhay> For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me.
Would you please explain "an older kernel" ? I'm using a kernel as of
Sep/30/2000 and it panics.
***
Note that this (Sep/30/2000) kernel doesn't panic until Oct/13/2000.
Between Oct/14/2000 and Oct/17/2000, "make release" was
> $ I'm very interested if current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up when "make
> $ release" procedure was running. current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up in
> $ these two days, when making a boot floppy (the hungup was occured
> $ *exactly* the same point).
>
> I have same experience.My current-box was hun
kana> I have same experience.My current-box was hung up when "make release".
kana> then, log is below:
Ya, exactly the same point of current.jp.FreeBSD.org. The same story
should be applied to current.FreeBSD.org. We cannot make a -current
distribution now. Changes from Oct/10/2000 to now cause
From: Makoto MATSUSHITA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org problems?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:30:30 +0900
$ I'm very interested if current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up when "make
$ release" procedure was running. current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up in
$
jkh> I'll look into this tomorrow morning, thanks.
I'm very interested if current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up when "make
release" procedure was running. current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up in
these two days, when making a boot floppy (the hungup was occured
*exactly* the same point).
-- -
Makoto
I'll look into this tomorrow morning, thanks.
> Bill G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have been trying to download a current snapshot from
> > current.freebsd.org for the past few days without success.
> > The error message I receive is 'Login incorrect' - I am
> > doing a standard anonymous f
Bill G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been trying to download a current snapshot from
> current.freebsd.org for the past few days without success.
> The error message I receive is 'Login incorrect' - I am
> doing a standard anonymous ftp, as always. Just wanted
> to make sure someone was aw
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 10:32:53PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> We've also been forced by the
> silicon valley personnel crunch to hire a new system administrator
> who's a little strange (he refers to himself as "Elvis Preston" and
> makes odd little hip-thrusts at the system rack when he think
* Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001008 22:36] wrote:
> Wow. Is it just me or does FreeBSD like to point fingers at everything that
> is not the issue. I do not believe that my mailer has anything to do with
> this. If you cannot roll with the punches, then that is your problem.
I don't eve
Behalf Of Jordan Hubbard
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:33 AM
To: Bill Woods mail
Cc: Thomas T. Veldhouse; FreeBSD-Current,
Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org
I'm sorry, but BSDi's dead-alien based UPS (as described in that fine
documentary film "repo man") has been unrel
> Well deal with it and get releng4 back up.
That reminds me of a joke: Q. "What do engineers use for birth control?" A. "Their
personalities."
We now return you to our regularly scheduled content-free discussion.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cur
exceptable answer here, then I'd like for u to say so.
Obviously "You do not get it"
-Original Message-
From: Alfred Perlstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:20 AM
To: Tony Johnson
Cc: Mike Smith; Bill Woods mail; Thomas T. Veldhouse; Fre
I'm sorry, but BSDi's dead-alien based UPS (as described in that fine
documentary film "repo man") has been unreliable lately and the
machines haven't been staying up. We've also been forced by the
silicon valley personnel crunch to hire a new system administrator
who's a little strange (he refer
Please get mailer that doesn't quote the messages you're replying to
in such a brain dead manner.
* Mike Smith wrote:
>
> Uh, folks, releng4 is hosted at (and donated by) Yahoo, and BSDi have
> exactly *nothing* to do with its availability or otherwise.
>
> Before making absurd allegations like
m releng4.freebsd.org
bash-2.04$
I don't think they have anything to do with hte cabling of relen4...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Smith
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 9:23 PM
To: Bill Woods mail
Cc: Thomas T. Veldhouse; FreeBSD-Curren
> Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by
> BSDI
Uh, folks, releng4 is hosted at (and donated by) Yahoo, and BSDi have
exactly *nothing* to do with its availability or otherwise.
Before making absurd allegations like this, please apply a few neurons to
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 07:13:56PM -0700, Bill Woods mail wrote:
> Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by
> BSDI
The clue boat left the docks and you were standing on the pier. Might I suggest
a long walk...
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH
Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by
BSDI
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> And releng4.freebsd.org is totally missing from the Internet. I suppose
> they are having another hardware problem again? Seems FreeBSD is a bit tough
> on
And releng4.freebsd.org is totally missing from the Internet. I suppose
they are having another hardware problem again? Seems FreeBSD is a bit tough
on hardware these days.
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Woods mail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTE
* Jordan K. Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000329 02:34]:
> Temporarily down; "engineers are working on the problem." :)
Does anyone have a semi-recent 3.4-STABLE snapshot available for public
consumption ? The latest I have lying around is 2303.
Thanks.
> > Is this a transient situation, o
Temporarily down; "engineers are working on the problem." :)
> Is this a transient situation, or is current down for maintainance ?
>
> [central-01:james] ~ (2) > ftp -a current.freebsd.org
> Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
> 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Tue Jan 25 00:05:3
Good luck getting an answer. Nobody seems willing to answer this
question. :(
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, James FitzGibbon wrote:
> Is this a transient situation, or is current down for maintainance ?
>
> [central-01:james] ~ (2) > ftp -a current.freebsd.org
> Connec
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me, as long as it runs :-).
>
> BTW, ran into another nit from the 02/13 snapshot. I installed the
> X-kern-developer distribution, discovered X11 didn't work, so went back
> into sysinstall to install X11 stuff. I selected some combination of X11
> comp
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I was actually talking about FreeBSD 4.0, not XFree86 4.0. :)
D'oh!
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
I was actually talking about FreeBSD 4.0, not XFree86 4.0. :)
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> > I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive
> > XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in
> > time to make a difference.
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive
> XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in
> time to make a difference.
Not to mention that 4.0 has "issues" with some
hardware/software/e
Sounds good to me, as long as it runs :-).
BTW, ran into another nit from the 02/13 snapshot. I installed the
X-kern-developer distribution, discovered X11 didn't work, so went back
into sysinstall to install X11 stuff. I selected some combination of X11
components, and chose releng3.freebsd.o
I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive
XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in
time to make a difference.
- Jordan
>
> It looks like the X11 associated with the snapshots on current.freebsd.org
> is still broken:
>
> /usr/libexe
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 01:00:33AM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> > current.freebsd.org is currently down due to a hardware failure. I don't
> > have an ETA on when it will be back up again, due to it being offsite.
> > I'll post more info as it becomes available.
>
> Usually hardware and softw
> current.freebsd.org is currently down due to a hardware failure. I don't
> have an ETA on when it will be back up again, due to it being offsite.
> I'll post more info as it becomes available.
Usually hardware and software craps out when the "demo detector" kicks
in. It seems that the we've go
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> What ever happened to current.freebsd.org. Here is the transcript of
> my last session:
[snip]
> It's been "broken" for the last couple of days.
Try releng3.freebsd.org.
- Donn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 12:58:26PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I'm still here for another hour, dammit. :-)
>
> I'm also going to be reachable for most of that week since Holland
> does have Internet connections now, you know. They got it along with
> electric lighting and running water at
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 12:58:26PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I'm still here for another hour, dammit. :-)
Don't miss that plane... I once needed to gallop around SFO and I did not like
that for one bit.
> I'm also going to be reachable for most of that week since Holland
> does have Inte
At 6:53 PM +0100 2/29/00, Dave Boers wrote:
>It is rumoured that Forrest Aldrich had the courage to say:
> > No, it allows you to log in, but will not accept anonymous logins.
> > Login Incorrect
>
>This has been going on for nearly 20 hours now. About 20 hours
>ago the machine was briefly unreach
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 08:10:19PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin Day writes:
> >
> >Here's what I see:
> >
> ># ftp current.freebsd.org
> >Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
> >220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Tue Jan 25 00:05:38 CST 2000)
I had this problem last night with current.freebsd.org. I simply switched
to releng3.freebsd.org. I thought it was the same machine, but the IP
address was one bit higher. Aliased?
Good luck,
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL
I'm still here for another hour, dammit. :-)
I'm also going to be reachable for most of that week since Holland
does have Internet connections now, you know. They got it along with
electric lighting and running water at least several years ago. :)
- Jordan
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kev
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin Day writes:
>
>Here's what I see:
>
># ftp current.freebsd.org
>Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
>220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Tue Jan 25 00:05:38 CST 2000)
>ready.
>Name (current.freebsd.org:toasty): ftp
>331 Guest login ok, send your c
>
>
> >
> > Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> >
> > > Is not allowing anonymous ftp logins.
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> >
> > I noticed this too... Maybe there's too many users, and is refusing
> > c
>
> Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
> > Is not allowing anonymous ftp logins.
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
> I noticed this too... Maybe there's too many users, and is refusing
> connections? Hmmm...
It is rumoured that Forrest Aldrich had the courage to say:
> No, it allows you to log in, but will not accept anonymous logins.
> Login Incorrect
This has been going on for nearly 20 hours now. About 20 hours ago the
machine was briefly unreachable and when it came online again it refused
logins
No, it allows you to log in, but will not accept anonymous logins.
Login Incorrect
At 11:56 AM 2/29/00 -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
>Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
> > Is not allowing anonymous ftp logins.
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Is not allowing anonymous ftp logins.
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I noticed this too... Maybe there's too many users, and is refusing
connections? Hmmm...
- Donn
To Unsubscribe:
85 matches
Mail list logo
