Re: cpu name

1999-11-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 12:48:21PM -0500, Byung Yang wrote: > I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu Offical GCC Project stance is that levels above -O3 are not offically supported. Above -O3 are experimental (if they are even paid attention to). Levels above -

Re: cpu name

1999-11-20 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [19991120 04:01], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any >suggestions? (it's not a big deal but still it's a bug) >I did not modify any of the source codes. I think someone else suggested lowering the optimisation level

Re: cpu name

1999-11-20 Thread Luke Hollins
>> printf("CPU: "); > Look again, the AMD identification can fill cpu_model using cpuid. > > The code doesn't appear to have changed lately, so if there is a > problem it's probably a matter of some processor being incorrectly > identified as supporting the feature. Or the processor is broken.

Re: cpu name

1999-11-20 Thread Byung Yang
I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower the optimization flag to -O? On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wr

Re: cpu name

1999-11-20 Thread David Scheidt
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Byung Yang wrote: > I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu > name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag > before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower > the optimization flag to -O?

Re: cpu name

1999-11-20 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Byung Yang wrote: > I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu > name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag > before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower > the optimization flag to -O?

Re: cpu name

1999-01-17 Thread Byung Yang
as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any suggestions? (it's not a big deal but still it's a bug) I did not modify any of the source codes. Byung On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [19991119 04:02], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >

Re: cpu name

1999-01-17 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Byung Yang wrote: > supped && made world a min ago: > check out the CPU: name > I am using AMD K6-2 333Mhz > > CPU: \^E (334.40-MHz 586-class CPU) Hmm, let me guess... probably you are compiling your kernel with -O3 (or higher)? If so, try to remove /sys/compile/MYKERNEL and compile with -O or w

Re: cpu name

1999-01-17 Thread Ville-Pertti Keinonen
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Looking at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c I see that the 0x580 is: > > case 0x580: > strcat(cpu_model, "K6-2"); > break; > > Which gets copied into: > > printf("CPU: "); > strncpy(cpu_model, i386_cpus[cpu].cpu_name, sizeof cp

Re: cpu name

1999-01-16 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [19991119 04:02], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >supped && made world a min ago: >check out the CPU: name >I am using AMD K6-2 333Mhz >--- >CPU: \^E (334.40-MHz 586-class CPU) > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping = 0