Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > > > > Strange: > > > Not so much, the first values for ras_start/end were chosen to be immediate > values, so you could just mov them, but the new one aren't. > Try something like the patch attached instead (untested, I have no

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Olivier Houchard
> > Strange: Not so much, the first values for ras_start/end were chosen to be immediate values, so you could just mov them, but the new one aren't. Try something like the patch attached instead (untested, I have no arm setup here, but you'll get the idea). Regards, Olivier Index: contrib/bind

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:29:03PM +0100, Grzegorz Bernacki wrote: > Hi, > > Some time ago we changed an address of RAS. Probably that's the problem. > Please try > with patch below. > > grzesiek > > diff --git a/contrib/bind9/lib/isc/arm/include/isc/atomic.h > b/contrib/bind9/lib/ > index 6a6

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Grzegorz Bernacki
Mark Tinguely wrote: Some time ago we changed an address of RAS. Probably that's the problem. Please try with patch below. grzesiek Good job. IMO, ARM atomic.h should have cmpxchg and the other standard atomic routines so applications don't roll their own and they become stale. Yes, I

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:13:15AM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > > > Some time ago we changed an address of RAS. Probably that's the problem. > > Please try > > with patch below. > > > > grzesiek > > Good job. > > IMO, ARM atomic.h should have cmpxchg and the other standard atomic routines

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Mark Tinguely
> > Some time ago we changed an address of RAS. Probably that's the problem. > Please try > with patch below. > > grzesiek Good job. IMO, ARM atomic.h should have cmpxchg and the other standard atomic routines so applications don't roll their own and they become stale. This will help applica

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Grzegorz Bernacki
Bernd Walter wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:29:03PM +0100, Grzegorz Bernacki wrote: Bernd Walter wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:12:06AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:47:39PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: <20100219033000.gz43...@cicely7.cicely.de>

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:29:03PM +0100, Grzegorz Bernacki wrote: > Bernd Walter wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:12:06AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > >>On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:47:39PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > >>>In message: <20100219033000.gz43...@cicely7.cicely.de> > >>>

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Grzegorz Bernacki
Bernd Walter wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:12:06AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:47:39PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: <20100219033000.gz43...@cicely7.cicely.de> Bernd Walter writes: : Warner - it names you in the copyright, so very likely you

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:12:06AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:47:39PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <20100219033000.gz43...@cicely7.cicely.de> > > Bernd Walter writes: > > : Warner - it names you in the copyright, so very likely you know this

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:47:39PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20100219033000.gz43...@cicely7.cicely.de> > Bernd Walter writes: > : Warner - it names you in the copyright, so very likely you know this code. > : I will build a debug version of bind, but as usual it will

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <20100219033000.gz43...@cicely7.cicely.de> Bernd Walter writes: : Warner - it names you in the copyright, so very likely you know this code. : I will build a debug version of bind, but as usual it will take some : time... Make sure that the code matches our current atomics

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:40:12PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20100219033000.gz43...@cicely7.cicely.de> > Bernd Walter writes: > : On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:12:00AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > : > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:10:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > : >

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:30:00AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:12:00AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:10:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:3

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <20100219033000.gz43...@cicely7.cicely.de> Bernd Walter writes: : On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:12:00AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: : > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:10:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: : > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: : > > > O

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:12:00AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:10:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:3

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <20100219031200.gy43...@cicely7.cicely.de> Bernd Walter writes: : On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:10:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: : > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: : > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: : > > > O

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:10:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:39:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > [55]Please.tell.me.who.am.I# g

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:10:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:39:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > [55]Please.tell.me.who.am.I# g

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:39:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > [55]Please.tell.me.who.am.I# gdb /usr/sbin/named named.core > > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > > Copyright

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-18 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:39:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > [55]Please.tell.me.who.am.I# gdb /usr/sbin/named named.core > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by t

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 2/16/2010 6:30 PM, Bernd Walter wrote: > Mmm - the port (without thread and without XML) works fine: I'm glad to here that you got something that works. Unfortunately when you start talking about threads on ARM you've pole vaulted outside of my competency area. If the folks on the -arm list can

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:13:27PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:02:24AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 2/16/2010 10:56 AM, Bernd Walter wrote: > > >> Wow, that was fast. :) It sure looks like that's the problem. Can you > > >> try compiling ports/dns/bind96 without thr

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:54:30PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20100216123646.fc741643.s...@freebsd.org> > Stanislav Sedov writes: > : On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:39:51 +0100 > : Bernd Walter mentioned: > : > : > > : > Do we have a general threading problem on ARM? > : >

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:36:46PM -0800, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:39:51 +0100 > Bernd Walter mentioned: > > > > > Do we have a general threading problem on ARM? > > > > I don't think so. I used a lot of threaded applications on arm, and they > worked fine. However, th

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:02:24AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 2/16/2010 10:56 AM, Bernd Walter wrote: > >> Wow, that was fast. :) It sure looks like that's the problem. Can you > >> try compiling ports/dns/bind96 without threads and see if that works for > >> you? If it does then it would be g

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:54:30PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20100216123646.fc741643.s...@freebsd.org> > Stanislav Sedov writes: > : On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:39:51 +0100 > : Bernd Walter mentioned: > : > : > > : > Do we have a general threading problem on ARM? > : >

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <20100216123646.fc741643.s...@freebsd.org> Stanislav Sedov writes: : On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:39:51 +0100 : Bernd Walter mentioned: : : > : > Do we have a general threading problem on ARM? : > : : I don't think so. I used a lot of threaded applications on arm, and they

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:39:51 +0100 Bernd Walter mentioned: > > Do we have a general threading problem on ARM? > I don't think so. I used a lot of threaded applications on arm, and they worked fine. However, this might be some obscure bug. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE pgptG2mf5LXSI.pgp

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 2/16/2010 10:56 AM, Bernd Walter wrote: >> Wow, that was fast. :) It sure looks like that's the problem. Can you >> try compiling ports/dns/bind96 without threads and see if that works for >> you? If it does then it would be good to follow up on >> freebsd-...@freebsd.org and see if the problem

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:45:14AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 2/16/2010 10:39 AM, Bernd Walter wrote: > > [55]Please.tell.me.who.am.I# gdb /usr/sbin/named named.core > > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU Gener

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start

2010-02-16 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:40:37AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 2/15/2010 1:39 PM, Bernd Walter wrote: > > [62]# uname -a > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r203927: Mon Feb 15 19:12:36 > > CET 2010 > > ti...@cicely14.cicely.de:/data/builder/arm-current/head/sys/arm/compile/FBO

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 2/16/2010 10:39 AM, Bernd Walter wrote: > [55]Please.tell.me.who.am.I# gdb /usr/sbin/named named.core > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start

2010-02-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 2/15/2010 1:39 PM, Bernd Walter wrote: > [62]# uname -a > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r203927: Mon Feb 15 19:12:36 CET > 2010 > ti...@cicely14.cicely.de:/data/builder/arm-current/head/sys/arm/compile/FBOX > arm > [64]# /etc/rc.d/named start > Starting named. > /etc/rc.d/n

Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM?

2010-02-16 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:39:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > [62]# uname -a > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r203927: Mon Feb 15 19:12:36 CET > 2010 > ti...@cicely14.cicely.de:/data/builder/arm-current/head/sys/arm/compile/FBOX > arm > [64]# /etc/rc.d/named start > Starting