It seems Klaus Herrmann wrote:
>
> ad0: 6197MB [12592/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA33
> [ata1-master: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=-1 dmaflag=1]
> [ata1-master: success setting up WDMA2 mode on VIA chip]
> ata1-master: CDROM device - NO DRIVER!
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in ker
> > options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA#Enable DMA on ATAPI devices
>
> Try removing this. According to the warning in LINT, this breaks many
> CDROMs.
>
i alreadya tried that - no change. as said, this crash appears even when
booting from boot floppies or generic.
regards,
Klaus
--
> In order to have a prompt answer, you should at least send the relevant
> parts of 3.4 dmesg and 4.0 dmesg (to let know to the driver maintainer
> which board you use, for example)
>
> The problem report you have sent is useless without this info
i'm sorry, i forgot.
4.0-dmesg:
ad0: 619
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Klaus Herrmann wrote:
> options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA#Enable DMA on ATAPI devices
Try removing this. According to the warning in LINT, this breaks many
CDROMs.
Kris
"How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?"
"Eight!"
"That was a rhetoric
In order to have a prompt answer, you should at least send the relevant
parts of 3.4 dmesg and 4.0 dmesg (to let know to the driver maintainer
which board you use, for example)
The problem report you have sent is useless without this info
TfH
Klaus Herrmann wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I ju
It seems Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, oZZ!!! wrote:
> > >What exactly is 'unwanted interrupt' supposed to mean, and is it
> > > likely to be a problem in my kernel configuration? (I can send a copy
> > > of it on request...)
> > i think it tell you about not used 2nd IDE controller
> > Am I confused (yet again)?
>
>Yes ;-)
>
>I mean the time it takes to actually detect the drive.
I recently added
options IDE_DELAY=2000
on all IDE kernels I managed. The only problem with this short delay
so far was an undetected drive in an unusual configuration:
The jumper b
> >After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree
> > (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver.
>
> The amazing speed of the new ATA driver? Were you using 32 bit transfers
> and multi-sector IO with the older driver?
>
> I assumed from the benchmarks posted that I
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, oZZ!!! wrote:
> >What exactly is 'unwanted interrupt' supposed to mean, and is it
> > likely to be a problem in my kernel configuration? (I can send a copy
> > of it on request...)
> i think it tell you about not used 2nd IDE controller...
Nope. I've got three IDE/ATAPI d
On Wed, Mar 3, 1999, oZZ!!! put this into my mailbox:
> i think it tell you about not used 2nd IDE controller...
Nope, my CD ROM is on the second IDE controller ...
-Chris
--
Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!"
int main(int m){main(!main(0));}
To Un
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
>After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree
> (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver.
>
> BUT
>
> I noticed something in dmesg...
>
> ata1: unwanted interrupt
> ad0: ATA-3 disk at ata0 as master
> ad0: 3090MB (6330
On Wed, Mar 3, 1999, Sheldon Hearn put this into my mailbox:
>
>
> On Wed, 03 Mar 1999 16:06:19 CST, Chris Costello wrote:
>
> >After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree
> > (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver.
>
> The amazing speed of the new ATA driver
On Wed, 03 Mar 1999 16:06:19 CST, Chris Costello wrote:
>After having CVSupped to the latest 4.0-CURRENT tree
> (just now), I noticed the amazing speed of the new ATA driver.
The amazing speed of the new ATA driver? Were you using 32 bit transfers
and multi-sector IO with the older driver?
13 matches
Mail list logo
