On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 14:54, David Gilbert wrote:
> I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as there seems
> to be a serious amount of magic going into the divided XFree86-4 port
> builds, but my XFree86-4-clients port fails saying:
>
> make: don't know how to make
> /usr/ports/x11/
> "Peter" == Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Eric Anholt wrote:
>> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 15:51, Peter Wemm wrote: > David Gilbert
>> wrote: > > I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as
>> there seems > > to be a serious amount of magic going into the
>> divided XF
> "Peter" == Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> David Gilbert wrote:
>> I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as there
>> seems to be a serious amount of magic going into the divided
>> XFree86-4 port builds, but my XFree86-4-clients port fails saying:
>>
>> make: d
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 16:05, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 15:51, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > David Gilbert wrote:
> > > > I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as there seems
> > > > to be a serious amount of magic going into the divided XFree86-4 por
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 15:51, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > David Gilbert wrote:
> > > I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as there seems
> > > to be a serious amount of magic going into the divided XFree86-4 port
> > > builds, but my XFree86-4-clients port fails sayin
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 15:51, Peter Wemm wrote:
> David Gilbert wrote:
> > I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as there seems
> > to be a serious amount of magic going into the divided XFree86-4 port
> > builds, but my XFree86-4-clients port fails saying:
> >
> > make: don't know
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:51:06PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> David Gilbert wrote:
> > I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as there seems
> > to be a serious amount of magic going into the divided XFree86-4 port
> > builds, but my XFree86-4-clients port fails saying:
> >
> > make
David Gilbert wrote:
> I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as there seems
> to be a serious amount of magic going into the divided XFree86-4 port
> builds, but my XFree86-4-clients port fails saying:
>
> make: don't know how to make /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/work/xc/export
Well, I am running a -CURRENT build from April 8. XF86-4.3.0 with a GF4
Ti4200 64MB with a 19" Sony Trinitron CRT (at 1600x1200, 72-75Hz), using the
official NVIDIA binary driver kernel module (compiled/installed from
/usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/).
Here's my XF86config (note that it referen
You can forcibly delete wrapper package, and the do pkgdb -F and delete
dependency on it... Only XFree metaport is depends on it.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, CARTER Anthony wrote:
>I realise what wrapper is
I realise what wrapper is for, but if I type pkg_delete wrappe-1.0_2 at
the command line, I get:
pkg_delete: package 'wrapper-1.0_2' is required by these other packages
and may not be deinstalled:
XFree86-4.3.0,1
I never installed wrapper, but when I did a portupgrade to the latest
XFree, I guess
CARTER Anthony wrote:
Xfree requires wrapper but seems to break GDM for user logins. Is this
normal, and can I force un-install wrapper without breaking anything?
Excuse me, I'm a bonehead. You don't need to uninstall wrapper, just
change this symbolic link:
/usr/X11R6/bin/X@ -> Xwrapper-4
to thi
wrapper is needed to run script startx by ordinary user, not root... Seems
like gdm works well for me without wrapper.
Shall we need to make XFree86-4.3.0,1 an option to install without wrapper
package?
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
> Please try setting the locale:
> export LC_CTYPE="ru_RU.KOI8-R"
> or
> setenv LC_CTYPE "ru_RU.KOI8-R"
Yow! Worked -- which is a bit strange: with 4.2 nothing like this was
necessary...
> --
> Alexander Pohoyda
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
-- Andrei
Andrei Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's something fishy with Xkb in 4.3: whenever I try cyrillic
> layouts (e.g. ru, bg, ua, etc.), I cannot type a thing (and yes,
> cyrillic fonts are listed in font path).
> Running xev shows that event is there. Anyone seen the same
> behavior/knows
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 11:30, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> > Hmmm. I have the same version of X as you (roughly, the tag was already
> > in place by the time I built although I always use HEAD, I built on 23rd
> > December) and FreeBSD i
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 11:30, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> Hmmm. I have the same version of X as you (roughly, the tag was already
> in place by the time I built although I always use HEAD, I built on 23rd
> December) and FreeBSD is from 25th December.
I just updated the sources to HEAD, and I see ch
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:09:28AM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone had any success with this combo?
Yes. Apart from the known problem with my S3 Virge GX2 graphics adapter,
which causes random freezes under X when only the reset button helps.
But this has been happenin
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:01:07PM -0800, Paul A. Scott wrote:
> XFree86 exits on signal 11 immediately after starting on FreeBSD 4.6 and
> 4.7. It is not possible to run the graphical configuration utility at all.
> After running curses configuration utility, running startx produces signal
> 11. N
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Saurabh Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any help will be very much appreciated.
When it freezes again, wait some minutes (~10). If it unfreezes then, it
is a known problem. And if you see some aborts (signal 6) of XFree86,
then it is a known problem to
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 12:17:54PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 10:25, Wesley Morgan wrote:
> > Does this bug effect -stable? It only showed up in -current recently.
> > Isn't it a bigger chance that something on the FreeBSD side made this bug
> > much more visible?
> >
> > O
Wesley Morgan wrote:
> Yes, i don't see any -stable systems bombing out. But it _always_ occurrs
> when typing. No matter what app...
I've seen in most often when starting X/gnome. Almost always happens
when gnome-panel is just appearing on screen. No typing going on yet,
naturally.
If gnome-p
Yes, i don't see any -stable systems bombing out. But it _always_ occurrs
when typing. No matter what app... Sometimes in the linux opera, sometimes
in the konq address bar. I dont think it ever happened when typing in an
Xterm though.
On 29 Sep 2002, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-29 at
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 21:17, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >From what I had heard on the lists it was only a thing that happened
> when people upgraded kernels, and that it had stopped after some date of
> kernel. I hadn't experienced it, so I ignored it. I don't know about
> that link posted, I thought
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 10:25, Wesley Morgan wrote:
> Does this bug effect -stable? It only showed up in -current recently.
> Isn't it a bigger chance that something on the FreeBSD side made this bug
> much more visible?
>
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>
> > I think it should be fixe
Does this bug effect -stable? It only showed up in -current recently.
Isn't it a bigger chance that something on the FreeBSD side made this bug
much more visible?
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> I think it should be fixed in FreeBSD ports before 4.7, because it
> is really annoying w
I think it should be fixed in FreeBSD ports before 4.7, because it
is really annoying when server crashes without any particular
reason.
Eric, what do you think about it?
-Maxim
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 14:51, walt wrote:
>
Hi,
I don't know why, but adding this to XF86Config:
Option "NoInt10"
Solved the problem.
Thank you anyways ;-)
Martin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
It seems Martin Blapp wrote:
> I used to have a functionaly working X. After I made world
> I see now this:
...
> I've removed everything and build a new X. Same symptoms.
>
> Mmap problem ?
I saw the same problem here, but after upgrading to sources around
1200GMT aug 21 the problem seems to be
Peter Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Amazing, the obvious. Now I get this:
Hmm, I didn't get any more trouble after I fixed the pragma problem.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body o
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
> I'm getting the following error on a just built -current, which was a
> fresh install of 5.0-CURRENT-20020519-JPSNAP:
Yes, and if you'd been reading the mailing list like you're supposed
to you would have already known about this.
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020530 01:01] wrote:
>>
>>>gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
>>>#pragma weak foo = bar
>>
>>What's the correct way to do this now?
>
>
> #pragma weak foo = "bar"
>
> as you'd h
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020530 01:01] wrote:
> > gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
> > #pragma weak foo = bar
> What's the correct way to do this now?
#pragma weak foo = "bar"
as you'd have guessed if you'd bothered to read the error message
> > > #pragma weak foo = bar
> >
> > What's the correct way to do this now?
>
> I dont know. :-( There are hacks that can work around it, but I think this
> is unintentional breakage. I tried changing this:
> #pragma weak foo = bar
> to
> __weak_reference(bar, foo);
void f () __attribute__ ((
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020530 01:01] wrote:
> > Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
> > >
> > > FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up
> >
> > gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
> > #pr
* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020530 01:01] wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
> >
> > FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up
>
> gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
> #pragma weak foo = bar
What's the correct
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
>
> FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up
gcc-3.1 appears to have broken
#pragma weak foo = bar
> Wilko
>
> > I'm getting the following error on a just built -current, which was a
>
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
FWIW: same here yesterday. I have not yet investigated what's up
Wilko
> I'm getting the following error on a just built -current, which was a
> fresh install of 5.0-CURRENT-20020519-JPSNAP:
>
> installing in lib/XThrStub...
> rm
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:35:32 -0700
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
KK> wrapper always needs to be rebuilt when you update X, yes.
All you really need to do is reset the X symlink (unless you are
upgrading from 3 to 4 in which case you need a new wrapper).
--
C:>WIN
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:39:22PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> Well X starts but just to the gray area, no windowmanager starts and the
> error I get(after I have exited) is:
>
> AUDIT: Fri Apr 19 22:09:13 2002: 16472 XFree86: client 1 rejected from
> local host
> AUDIT: Fri Apr 19 22:09:15 20
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:02:11AM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
>
>>Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:13:23PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
>>>
>>>
After yesterdays new build I found a problem
Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:56:50PM -0700, James Satterfield wrote:
> I've found that wrapper needs to be updated with XFree86-4.
wrapper always needs to be rebuilt when you update X, yes.
Kris
msg37453/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:02:11AM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:13:23PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> >
> >>After yesterdays new build I found a problem
> >>Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
> >
> >
> > Read the fine message yo
I've found that wrapper needs to be updated with XFree86-4.
James.
- Original Message -
From: "John Angelmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "current" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:13 PM
Subject: Xfree86-4 problem
> After yesterdays new build I found a problem
> Xfree86-4
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:13:23PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
>
>>After yesterdays new build I found a problem
>>Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
>
>
> Read the fine message you got at install-time and install the wrapper
> port.
>
> Kris
Wrapper is in
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:13:23PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> After yesterdays new build I found a problem
> Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
Read the fine message you got at install-time and install the wrapper
port.
Kris
msg37428/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
That's what I suspected. I may try setting up the serial console on
that box and see what I can find.
--
coleman
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:33:40AM +0300, Andrew Bliznak wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Coleman Kane wrote:
>
> Its usb. Someone with working serial console need look at this.
>
> > I
Yeah, I rememver that. I think it is the USB though, it crashes right at the
point where it attempts to attach Input devs.
--
coleman
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 02:35:50PM +0200, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:14:43AM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
> > I have been having major issue
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:14:43AM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
> I have been having major issues with XFree86 recently. It seems to just
> completely halt the machine hard whenever I try starting it. If I run
> it from a remote terminal with -verbose all the way up, it seems to halt
> at the sectio
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Coleman Kane wrote:
Its usb. Someone with working serial console need look at this.
> I have been having major issues with XFree86 recently. It seems to just
> completely halt the machine hard whenever I try starting it. If I run
> it from a remote terminal with -verbose all
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:01:57AM -0600, Eric Liedtke wrote:
> While trying to build the XFree86-4-Server port this evening(cvsuped
> today around 1PM CST)
> the build died due to a redefinition of xf86ioctl. The file
> /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server/work/xc/programs/Xserver/include/xf8
On 20-Mar-2002 (20:29:26/GMT) Will Andrews wrote:
>> With last update of world and ports I'm unable to start XFree86.
>> I have a matrox G200 (agp) and I have tryed with and without the
>> WITH_MATROX_GXX_DRIVER=yes but I got only a signal 10, core dump
> What is your pkg_info -Ia?
I removed _a
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:29:46AM +0100, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> With last update of world and ports I'm unable to start XFree86.
> I have a matrox G200 (agp) and I have tryed with and without the
> WITH_MATROX_GXX_DRIVER=yes but I got only a signal 10, core dump
> when starting X. At the same
> What are the plans about replacing XFree86 3.3.6 with XFree86 4?
According to plan, FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE will have XFree86 4, so sometime
after this month and before the next release.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On 2001-Nov-30 10:55:39 +0200, Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> With a recently re-built XFree86, running on -current from last Sunday,
>> whenever I hit one of the keypad keys, the X server crashes. This is
>> somewhat disconcerting...
...
>Apply the following
Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> With a recently re-built XFree86, running on -current from last Sunday,
> whenever I hit one of the keypad keys, the X server crashes. This is
> somewhat disconcerting...
>
> The kernel prints "sigreturn: eflags = 0x13282, was 0x256" (the old
> eflags value an addition I
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:44:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> > Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a
> > week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries?
>
> Yes.
To elaborate a bit, the default XFree86
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a
> week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries?
Yes.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a
> week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries?
>
> They asks for XFree86-libraries-4.1.0, but I have 3.3.6_10
> installed. Can I (safetly) mix 3.3.6 and 4.1.0?
> Is
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:50:28PM -0600, Chris wrote:
>
> If you are currently running 4.0.1, I would seriously recommend skipping
> this
> minor revision. I have run into a multitude of problems with it, and am now
> back right where I started.
>
> One, is the lack of DRM support for the matr
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:51:05AM -0600, David Syphers wrote:
>
> > the binaries from a directory labeled "FreeBSD 5.x". So I tried the ports,
> > and it built fine for a long time, and then after about 35300 lines of
> > output to the screen, ran into
> >
> > make: do
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:51:05AM -0600, David Syphers wrote:
> the binaries from a directory labeled "FreeBSD 5.x". So I tried the ports,
> and it built fine for a long time, and then after about 35300 lines of
> output to the screen, ran into
>
> make: don't know how to make ../../../fonts
< said:
> Eventually yes, but not this way. According to Bruce sys/types is a
> prerequisite for sys/wait.
This is currently true, but should be fixed this year (probably not
this month -- it depends on how much energy I have).
Draft 4 (draft 5 isn't out yet) of POSIX.1-200x says the following
Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
>
> * From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * The following 2 patches solve the problem when building XFree86-3.3.6
> * with only the VGA16 and SVGA servers. Building other servers may still
> * be broken.
>
> Yikes. The same problem is killin
On 26 Oct 2000, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> * From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * The following 2 patches solve the problem when building XFree86-3.3.6
> * with only the VGA16 and SVGA servers. Building other servers may still
> * be broken.
>
> Yikes. The same pro
* From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* The following 2 patches solve the problem when building XFree86-3.3.6
* with only the VGA16 and SVGA servers. Building other servers may still
* be broken.
Yikes. The same problem is killing (at least) all the emacsen too.
http://bento.FreeB
Patrick Gardella wrote:
>
> In file included from /usr/include/sys/wait.h:93,
> from vgaHW.c:44:
> /usr/include/machine/endian.h:72: syntax error before
> `__uint16_swap_unit32'
> /usr/include/machine/endian.h:72: syntax error before `__x'
>
>
The following 2 patches solve the
Patrick Gardella wrote:
>
> I built and installed -current on a laptop yesterday (10/23/00), and
> went to build XFree86 3.3.6_3 today from the ports directory.
>
> It built fine, but when you run make install, it dies, complaining of
> syntax errors in machine/endian.h:
>
> In file included fr
Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
>
> >In file included from /usr/include/sys/wait.h:93,
> > from vgaHW.c:44:
> >/usr/include/machine/endian.h:72: syntax error before
> >`__uint16_swap_unit32'
> >/usr/include/machine/endian.h:72: syntax error before `__x'
> >
> >
> >I've not seen this
"Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" wrote:
>
> >In file included from /usr/include/sys/wait.h:93,
> > from vgaHW.c:44:
> >/usr/include/machine/endian.h:72: syntax error before
> >`__uint16_swap_unit32'
> >/usr/include/machine/endian.h:72: syntax error before `__x'
> >
> >
> >I've not seen thi
>In file included from /usr/include/sys/wait.h:93,
> from vgaHW.c:44:
>/usr/include/machine/endian.h:72: syntax error before
>`__uint16_swap_unit32'
>/usr/include/machine/endian.h:72: syntax error before `__x'
>
>
>I've not seen this reported before, nor a work around.
I don't k
Mark Murray wrote:
>
> BTW - there is no XF86Setup in XFree86-4 yet.
No, but there is xf86cfg, which is even better ;^)
It correctly autodetected both my Monitor and Video card, meaning that I
was able to get maximum performance out of both (proper Modelines).
Though 1962x1440 is pushing it o
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 9/7/00, 12:18:07 PM, Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: XFree86 :
> > Hi,
> > I have inst
> Hi,
> I have installed XFree86 and there is no XF86Setup. Have you any idea -
> why?
> I want to increase depth of color and modifing /etc/XF86Config has no
> result.
Tcl/Tk.
Build X, clean it out. Build Tcl/Tk 8.2. Build X again. You'll have XF86Setup.
BTW - there is no XF86Setup in XFree86-
>> Original Message <<
On 9/7/00, 10:51:14 AM, Piotr Woniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote regarding XFree86:
> Hi,
> I have installed XFree86 and there is no XF86Setup. Have you any idea
-
> why?
> I want to increase depth of color and modifing /etc/XF86Config has
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 11:48:16PM +0300, Ilya Naumov wrote:
> i've tried to build XFree86 4.0 on my 5.0-CURRENT and 4.0-RELEASE box, and
>encountered
> a problem.
>
> "make all" finishes successfully, but "make install" fails with the
> following error message:
>
> making all in programs/Xserv
I can varify this on 4.0-STABLE as of March 19, ports cvsup the same time.
I had a look at it, and though I'm not much of a programmer, I cant see
where the parse error is.. maybe I'm blind.
Matt
--
Matt Heckaman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [Please do not send me]
!Powered by FreeBSD/x8
Andrey Sverdlichenko wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ted Sikora wrote:
>
> > XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
>
> options SHMALL=1025
> options SHMMAX="(SHMMAXPGS*PAGE_SIZE+1)"
> options SHMMAXPGS=1025
> options SHMMIN=2
> option
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ted Sikora wrote:
> XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> Any ideas on a fix. Xfree86-4.0 is solid otherwise.
>
There was quite some discussion about this recent on either -hackers or
-current. You should be able to find it in the archives.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ted Sikora wrote:
> XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
options SHMALL=1025
options SHMMAX="(SHMMAXPGS*PAGE_SIZE+1)"
options SHMMAXPGS=1025
options SHMMIN=2
options SHMMNI=256
options SHMSEG=128
"Michael L. Imamura" wrote:
>
> I haven't tried xfce, but I had some problems running Enlightenment 16.3,
> all related to shared memory. I disabled shared pixmaps in my Imlib
> configuration and that got rid of the random crashing, but is again not a
> very optimal solution :) I'm guessing it'
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 02:30:46AM +, Cliff Rowley wrote:
> Two things, I know it's silly, but I might as well ask:
>
> 1) Did you install XFree86 4 over an old XFree86? If so, did you ask it
> specifically to make and install aout libraries (re: __Xglobal_lock) - the
> aout libraries arent
Ted Sikora wrote:
>
> My problem is a little different. XFree86-4.0 loads
> fine looks great but the mouse does not work. There
> are no errors. I tried PS/2 , serial, etc same with
> them all. The pointer appears then moves to the upper
> right and dissappers. I tried moving it...Mouse1, etc.
>
I haven't tried xfce, but I had some problems running Enlightenment 16.3,
all related to shared memory. I disabled shared pixmaps in my Imlib
configuration and that got rid of the random crashing, but is again not a
very optimal solution :) I'm guessing it's a problem with the current GTK
versi
"Michael L. Imamura" wrote:
>
> I was able to get it working through a small patch to the
> scripts/configure file. Probably not the most optimal solution, but it
> works until the port is updated:
>
> --- configure Fri Mar 10 19:20:34 2000
> +++ configure.2 Sat Mar 11 18:19:55 2000
> @@ -197
> Nawfal M Rouyan writes:
> Hi,
> I've installed XFree86 version 4 trough the ports
> collection
> but it won't start and I think it is because of the
> missing mouse module. Since I'm using lynx, I can't
> attached the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file for your
> reference. I can only paste
I was able to get it working through a small patch to the
scripts/configure file. Probably not the most optimal solution, but it
works until the port is updated:
--- configure Fri Mar 10 19:20:34 2000
+++ configure.2 Sat Mar 11 18:19:55 2000
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
echo "#define BuildXInputExt
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 04:10:26PM -0500, Ted Sikora wrote:
> My problem is a little different. XFree86-4.0 loads
> fine looks great but the mouse does not work. There
> are no errors. I tried PS/2 , serial, etc same with
> them all. The pointer appears then moves to the upper
> right and dissa
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 12:24:10PM -0800, Nawfal M. Rouyan wrote:
> Hi,
> I've installed XFree86 version 4 trough the ports
> collection
> but it won't start and I think it is because of the
> missing mouse module. Since I'm using lynx, I can't
> attached the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file for your
>
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Devin Butterfield wrote:
> Just wondering if there are plans in the works to get Xfree86 4.0 into
> FreeBSD 4.0. I just noticed that X 4.0 has finally been released.
Looks a bit green for inclusion in a release not to mention that its list
of supported devices is a bit short i
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Kevin Day wrote:
> >
> > That's odd... I just built it tonight, and I havn't had anything but this:
> >
> > XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> > XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> > XFree86-Bigfont extensio
>
> That's odd... I just built it tonight, and I havn't had anything but this:
>
> XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> XFree8
That's odd... I just built it tonight, and I havn't had anything but this:
XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
XFree86-Bigfont exten
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> That's odd... I just built it tonight, and I havn't had anything but this:
>
> XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> XFree86-Bigfont extension: s
"Patrick M. Hausen" wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I don't know if this has been addressed already, but the archives are
> offline.
>
> I started using current by installing 2127-SNAP of current.freebsd.org
> including XFree86 3.3.6. The Xfree86 a.out libraries were missing
> from the installtion t
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 07:51:22AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I can say that I tried building the 3.9.17 with both official compiler
> in -current and also with gcc-devel, both built fine but didn't install.
> Seems like my fault, nothing else. Time to try again.
It seem
(trimmed the long cc:-list)
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 07:51:22AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> The problem with 3.3.5 was something to do with refreshing, example
> after doing some ls -la in xterm the xterm screen got blank completely
> or showed some lines of text in the bottom but otherwise re
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 01:17:53AM +0100, Andreas Braukmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ... what was the problem with the G400 in earlier revisions?
> 3.3.5 (built from the port) lives quite happily on my G400?
>
> I'm very eager to get my hands on a XFree86 with dual-head support
> and truet
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 01:17:53AM +0100, Andreas Braukmann wrote:
> Is the gcc-2.96-current in the ports collection?
Yes. /usr/ports/lang/gcc-devel
--
-- David([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the messag
For those using XFree86 3.9.17 or higher and have a Matrox
g400 or g200 feel free to use mpegplay or mpeg2play from
my ftp site . Both programs have been modified to use the new XFree86 Xv PutImage
extension which can do yuv->rgb + scaling hardware assisted -- for instance
mpeg play can sc
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
