On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:40:07AM +0900, I wrote:
> > Apparently you have KTR enabled (not the default in GENERIC). I think
> > WITNESS+KTR already caused nasty recursion from the mtx_lock_spin, and
> > we now get an endless loop when nanotime() is called with an invalid
> > timecounter in the f
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 04:34:00AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I inserted a pair of printf() inside mtx_lock_spin/mtx_unlock_spin in
> > i8254_get_timecount() and it kept printing the message while tc_init()
> > was blocked, so I think it's blocked
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I inserted a pair of printf() inside mtx_lock_spin/mtx_unlock_spin in
> i8254_get_timecount() and it kept printing the message while tc_init()
> was blocked, so I think it's blocked at mtx_lock_spin in i8254_get_timecount()
> when called from tc_init(
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> The only thing I know off right now is this thing from BDE which
> I havn't been able to verify yet:
I got the hang for all boots, but it was a local problem. I had added
a nanouptime() call the tc_windup(), and this spins forever when
tc_windup()
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 08:49:18AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <20020306054514.GA395@gzl>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >Hello.
> > >After upgrading to the kernel as of 2002-03-03 00:00:00(UTC), it stopped
> > >booting just after the message:
> > >
> > >Timecounter "i8254" fre
The only thing I know off right now is this thing from BDE which
I havn't been able to verify yet:
From:Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dummy_timecounter broken; breaks booting with -d
To: <[EMAIL PR
