- Original Message -
From: "Jake Burkholder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Xu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: vm panic
>...
> Don't know if this is the problem o
Apparently, On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:45:13AM +0800,
David Xu said words to the effect of;
> panic: lockmgr: locking against myself
> Debugger("panic")
> Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0
> db>trace
> Debugger(c0381630,c03e4ee0,c037fd14,da447c28,1) at Debugger+0x54
> pani
> What kind of value do you use for N? It looks like lately the makefiles
> are too aggressive when using -j, so you end up with N * N * 2 processes
> running simultaneously. On my -current box with 128M RAM, I used -j13
> for a long time, but that runs out of swap nowadays, so I'm using -j4
> whi
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Yes. My ASUS Dual P90 machine has the same problem. I just thought it
> was the MP Spec compliance level of the BIOS, and gave up running
> -current. I guess it's not just me. 8-(.
Its likely that we've got the same motherboard.
Mine is a PCI/E-P54
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jason wrote:
> > Wierd, I have it running just peachy on a dual P3 900 box
>
> Just so nobody else replies to this with something similar we're talking
> about PENTIUMS.
>
> Not the P3, P2, Alpha or anything else.
Yes. My ASUS Dual P90 machine ha
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jason wrote:
> Wierd, I have it running just peachy on a dual P3 900 box
Just so nobody else replies to this with something similar we're talking
about PENTIUMS.
Not the P3, P2, Alpha or anything else.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetB
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jason wrote:
> Wierd, I have it running just peachy on a dual P3 900 box
It runs mostly okay on my dual P3/600, although for the last couple of
months it has a tendency to panic with a "bdwrite: buffer is not busy" on
average 2-3 times a day (per approx 15 hour run) Such is
Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
>On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
>
>
>>If I do a "make -jN world" build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
>>up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
>>the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running.
>>
>>A
In the last episode (Aug 18), David Wolfskill said:
> From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all.
>
> I'm not.
>
> > both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C
> > and dual P55C).
>
> freebeast(5.0-C)[2]
> I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all.
>
> both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C and
> dual P55C).
I am running SMP CURRENT kernel on 4-Alpha processors . No problems
for a lot of months.
Yuri.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
>Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 20:44:52 -0400 (EDT)
>From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
>> If I do a "make -jN world" build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
>> up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
>> the panic alw
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
> If I do a "make -jN world" build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
> up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
> the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running.
>
> Anyone else getting this?
I'm amaz
>
> If I do a "make -jN world" build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
> up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
> the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running.
>
> Anyone else getting this?
What kind of value do you use for N? It look
13 matches
Mail list logo
