Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030624 19:01]: > As of last testing (yesterday my laptop (non SMP) acted the same.. > > I'm not sure what to suggest. > can you confirm that you are running the newest of everything.. > (though as far as I know it was ok, even several weeks ago). I'll re-cv

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > I can not duplicate this.. > ON a system (SMP) compiled this afternoon (checked out this afternoon > too), ksetest responds immediatly to ^C and ^Z in the expected manner. > > I am using the csh as my shell and was running as root AND as myself > for t

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Julian Elischer
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Michael Edenfield wrote: [...] > thread_start() : 0x84af000 84af000 > kse_create() -> 0 > A*.kse_create() -> -1 > [...] > *R*.S.*T*.^C^D^Z > > (no response on this tty, so I close it). I can not duplicate this.. ON a system (SMP) compiled this afternoon (checked out this a

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Julian Elischer
If it's duplicatable on recent systems I'll see it on my test system... thanks.. On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Michael Edenfield wrote: > * Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030624 14:47]: > > > > I had the same experience just running the KSE test application from > > > /usr/src/tools last night.

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030624 14:47]: > > I had the same experience just running the KSE test application from > > /usr/src/tools last night. I ended up with three unkillable ksetest > > applications and ultimately rebooted to get rid of them. I was > > planning to report it a

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > what about kill -9 887 > ? > The signals in libKSE are known to be 'delicate'. > We are working on (well, actually David Xu is working on) > a set of code to make the signal more robust. > Hopefully this will fix the problem you are seeing.. Kill -9 d

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Julian Elischer
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Michael Edenfield wrote: > * Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030624 12:45]: > > > Thought I would give libKSE a try making use of the 'libmap.conf' library > > translations. KDE loads fine, but when I tried to run Firebird I get a > > process with 3 threads, and it is co

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Julian Elischer
what about kill -9 887 ? The signals in libKSE are known to be 'delicate'. We are working on (well, actually David Xu is working on) a set of code to make the signal more robust. Hopefully this will fix the problem you are seeing.. Any other comments? Other than not being able to kill it, how as t

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030624 12:45]: > Thought I would give libKSE a try making use of the 'libmap.conf' library > translations. KDE loads fine, but when I tried to run Firebird I get a > process with 3 threads, and it is completely unkillable. It also is I had the same experience