Michael Edenfield wrote:
* Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031127 17:50]:
On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
walt wrote:
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performanc
* Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031127 17:50]:
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
> > walt wrote:
> > > To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
> > >
> > > And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
> > > performan
On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
> walt wrote:
> > To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
> >
> > And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
> > performance issues associated with dynamic linking? Do they do
> > anyt
walt wrote:
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performance issues associated with dynamic linking? Do they do
anything special, or just ignore the whole thing?
Don't they fix the performance h
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 15:15, walt wrote:
> And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
> performance issues associated with dynamic linking? Do they do
> anything special, or just ignore the whole thing?
My understanding is that they perform a special linking/postprocessin
