On Thursday, 6th January 2000, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote:
>Does these patches fix your problem, or should another better
>fix is desired? Please give me any opinions.
It passes all my tests. Please commit it. Thank you!
And earlier you wrote:
>Because now there is interface statistics display mo
> Hmm, I've just noticed some small misalignment of column headings in the
> default output. I'll fix that too.
>
> Stephen.
I also noticed that my another IPv6 related change is one of
main cause of the misalignment.
So I also tried to make patches for it, including
"netstat -f inet -i" issue.
I think my last description was poor.
> Could this be left with adding sflag check?
> Because now there is interface statistics display mode, when, e.g.
Maybe improved one is,
Because now there is a mode where protocol specific statistics
over each interface is displayed.
Yoshinobu Inoue
> Recently that changed, and "netstat -f inet -i" in particular changed to
> give the -f flag priority over the -i flag. This makes no sense to me,
> so I intend to commit this patch:
Could this be left with adding sflag check?
Because now there is interface statistics display mode, when, e.g.
