Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade

2016-03-11 Thread Ultima
Just upgraded again to r296709. Running for about an hour, performance appears to be restored. Will report back if this changes. On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Ultima wrote: > Hmm, the total cost would be hard to calculate, not all of it was > purchased at the same time. > > CPU - ( E5-2670v3

Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade

2016-03-11 Thread Ultima
Should I restart and provide this info after 20min into build? Or is this good info? On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ultima wrote: > last pid: 96327; load averages: 41.78, 50.32, 50.07up 1+05:19:23 > 18:52:47 > 169 processes: 11 running, 158 sleeping > CPU: 24.4% user, 0.2% nice, 15.

Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade

2016-03-11 Thread Ultima
last pid: 96327; load averages: 41.78, 50.32, 50.07up 1+05:19:23 18:52:47 169 processes: 11 running, 158 sleeping CPU: 24.4% user, 0.2% nice, 15.1% system, 0.1% interrupt, 60.3% idle Mem: 12G Active, 43G Inact, 186G Wired, 8867M Free ARC: 166G Total, 122G MFU, 38G MRU, 46M Anon, 753M He

Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade

2016-03-11 Thread Allan Jude
On 03/11/2016 18:49, Ultima wrote: > Hello, > > Recently I upgraded to r296377, and notice a big hit in performance. This > system in question is a poudriere building system that usually has many > jails running building around 200-400 pkg per hour for each jail. After the > upgrade, it is rare t