Re: SUJ Changes

On 5/27/10, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Marcelo/Porks > wrote: >> On 5/27/10, John Baldwin wrote: >>> On Thursday 27 May 2010 10:13:38 am Marcelo/Porks wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garre

Re: SUJ Changes

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:47 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 27 May 2010 10:13:38 am Marcelo/Porks wrote: >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >> > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks > wrote: >>

Re: SUJ Changes

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Marcelo/Porks wrote: > On 5/27/10, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Thursday 27 May 2010 10:13:38 am Marcelo/Porks wrote: >>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >>> > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >> On Wed, May 26, 201

Re: SUJ Changes

On 5/27/10, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 27 May 2010 10:13:38 am Marcelo/Porks wrote: >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >> > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > H

Re: SUJ Changes

On Thursday 27 May 2010 10:13:38 am Marcelo/Porks wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi guys. I'm not sure if I could call this a pro

Re: SUJ Changes

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi guys. I'm not sure if I could call this a problem but I can disable >> > SU when SUJ is enabled, so SUJ will

Re: SUJ Changes

On Wednesday 26 May 2010 7:56:24 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks wrote: > > On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote: > >> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my > >> atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU when the SUJ is > >>

Re: SUJ Changes

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 23:56:24 Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks > wrote: >> > On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote: >> >> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my >> >> atention to

Re: SUJ Changes

On Wednesday 26 May 2010 23:56:24 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks wrote: > > On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote: > >> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my > >> atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU when the SUJ is > >> en

Re: SUJ Changes

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks wrote: > On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote: >> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my >> atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU when the SUJ is >> enabled? >> >> I did some tests and seems that I can do this (logs be

Re: SUJ Changes

On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote: > Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my > atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU when the SUJ is > enabled? > > I did some tests and seems that I can do this (logs bellow). > > But will SUJ work properly with SU disabled? Hi gu

Re: SUJ Changes

On 5/17/10, Jeff Roberson wrote: > I fixed the sparse inode tunefs bug and changed the tunefs behavior based > on discussions here on curr...@. Hopefully this works for everyone. Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU whe