On 01-Nov-01 Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
>> > I *DID* test it with a full `make world'. By chance is this your second
>> > `make world' after the change? It seems we are using the host awk
>> > instead of the one we
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:12:43PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > My only purpose in replying was to state my objection to the
> > sufficency of David's argument. There are a lot of things that aren't
> > "required," but are a good idea none the less
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:12:43PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> My only purpose in replying was to state my objection to the
> sufficency of David's argument. There are a lot of things that aren't
> "required," but are a good idea none the less.
All I'll say is just about every large change
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > I *DID* test it with a full `make world'. By chance is this your second
> > > `make world' after the change? It seems we are using the host awk
> > > instead o
(Sigh. In my mkioctls patch I tried to get rid of the need to pass in
$ioctl_includes to awk but I can't think of any way to make that work. Oh
well. Glad it works now.)
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
> > I *DID* test it with a full `make world'. By chance is this your second
> > `make world' after the change? It seems we are using the host awk
> > instead of the one we built. Requiring someone to do two back
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:56:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 06:12:07PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> It does not work.
Bummer. I'll look at it when I get back from dinner.
> > +cat <<'EOT'
> > +/* XXX obnoxious prerequisites. */"
> ^^^
>
> what should this " be terminating? Or where is it's
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 05:14:34PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead??
>
> What about this patch?
It does not work.
> +cat <<'EOT'
> +/* XXX obnoxious prerequisites. */"
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead??
What about this patch?
--- mkioctls.orig Wed Oct 31 17:08:33 2001
+++ mkioctlsWed Oct 31 17:13:07 2001
@@ -19,50 +19,48 @@
# Build a list of headers that have ioc
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:56:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?
> >
> > Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?
>
> Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead??
That's fine.
But, before pulling the switch on a maj
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?
Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead??
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
13 matches
Mail list logo
