On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:11:12AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 03:22:52PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > On 27/04/2025 17:26, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > > On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > > >
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 03:22:52PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 27/04/2025 17:26, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > > BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids the problem even though they
On 27/04/2025 17:26, Mark Johnston wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids the problem even though they
do not use any special dlopen flags.
It turns out that they link almost all s
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids the problem even though they
> > do not use any special dlopen flags.
> > It turns out that they link almost all system shared libraries with
> >
On 23/04/2025 21:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
BTW, I've been wondering how illumos avoids the problem even though they do not
use any special dlopen flags.
It turns out that they link almost all system shared libraries with -Bdirect
option (which is Solaris/illumos specific).
It's somewhat similar t
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 09:09:56PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 19/04/2025 13:29, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:25:28PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > On 19/04/2025 12:39, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > > From a quick look at the code, should we try to resolve the symb
On 19/04/2025 13:38, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
And there is the version with the recursive marking by deepbind:
I think that this patch would help with my case (haven't tested yet).
But I am not sure if it would be "correct".
First, as you have rightfully asked, it's not clear that deepbind s
On 19/04/2025 13:29, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:25:28PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 19/04/2025 12:39, Andriy Gapon wrote:
From a quick look at the code, should we try to resolve the symbol in
refobj itself when it's marked with deepbind?
Oh, and it looks like obj
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:29:15PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:25:28PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > On 19/04/2025 12:39, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > On 19/04/2025 12:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > > On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > > RTLD_DEE
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:25:28PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 19/04/2025 12:39, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > On 19/04/2025 12:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > RTLD_DEEPBIND works by first iterating over all (recursive) DT_NEEEDED
> > > > object f
On 19/04/2025 12:39, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 19/04/2025 12:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
RTLD_DEEPBIND works by first iterating over all (recursive) DT_NEEEDED
object for the object where the symbol is resolved, then by looking at
the global list of load
On 19/04/2025 12:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Could it be that the module is linked to the main binary?
It does not appear to be so.
The binary:
$ ldd /usr/local/bin/mdb
/usr/local/bin/mdb:
libncursesw.so.9 => /lib/libncursesw.so.9 (0xbf191c9
On 19/04/2025 02:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Could it be that the module is linked to the main binary?
It does not appear to be so.
The binary:
$ ldd /usr/local/bin/mdb
/usr/local/bin/mdb:
libncursesw.so.9 => /lib/libncursesw.so.9 (0xbf191c93000)
libtinfow.so.9 => /lib/libtin
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:03:15AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I am trying to understand if RTLD_DEEPBIND should help in the following
> scenario or if I misunderstand its purpose.
>
> There is a program that has a parser based on lex/yacc, so there is function
> yyparse in the code and global
14 matches
Mail list logo
