Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-14 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Quickcam ] > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:39:00PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time. > > > and just testing no

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:39:00PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time. > > and just testing now i get a lot of > > I haven't looked at it for a couple of years.. > it did work for me then but it may not any more.. vic/vat work but

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Randy Bush
>> i have a problem with the 'own' part. it would be nice if we could >> conference with people who do not run freebsd too. > "Nice but not crucial" very true, if you only want to meet with to one percent of the folk out there. i need tools i can use in real life, not just in a clique club hous

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Randy Bush wrote: > i have a problem with the 'own' part. it would be nice if we could > conference with people who do not run freebsd too. "Nice but not crucial" > > last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time. > and just testing now i get a lot

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Randy Bush
> but it'd be nice if FreeBSD could build it's own "conference-net" > so we could do that sort of thing.. i have a problem with the 'own' part. it would be nice if we could conference with people who do not run freebsd too. last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time. and

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > It'd have been nice if (for example) the KSE talk I did last week > > at BAFUG could have been to a wider audience.. > > well in that specific case just audio would have sufficed :) Uh, yeah.. we had no whiteboard :-( but it'd be nice if FreeBSD

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:24:36PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: ... > i.e. using a set of tools that are definitly supported and a supported > videocam, we could say "If you get this camera, and load the following > ports, you will be able to take part in conferences > by attaching to the follow

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Julian Elischer
On a related note... I woulder if it might be a worthwhile project to start a "FreeBSD videoconference" project.. i.e. using a set of tools that are definitly supported and a supported videocam, we could say "If you get this camera, and load the following ports, you will be able to take part i

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Jonathan Belson
Juli Mallett wrote: > I was working on porting the Linux driver for this to freebsd's kernel > at one point. In general, your best shot is to find something that > gphoto supports. Was that the QuickCam Express? I started doing that also, but John Hay did it first. There were some issues with

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Thomas Vaughan
I also had good luck with OV511 based cameras. A Google search for that should turn up a lot of good results. (This includes cameras like Creative Labs' WebCam 3, all USB) On Sunday 13 October 2002 01:49 pm, Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-13 ] >

Re: Quickcam

2002-10-13 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-13 ] [ Subjecte: Quickcam ] > I was thinking about buying a webcam (Logitech QuickCam) with an USB port. > What kind of usbcams does FreeBSD-Current support? I was working on porting the Linux driver for this to freebsd's kernel at on