Michael Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> Actually, several ports give you the option of building with or
> without X support (i.e., SSH). It would be nice to have a USE_X11
> option in /etc/make.conf for doscmd as well as these ports, so you
> don't have to specify i
Taavi Talvik wrote:
>
> Maybe knob in /etc/make.conf instead to force compiling with X?
>
Nah, we don't need to. doscmd doesn't have X support by default (now
that I've committed the fix). Recompiling doscmd to get X (given X is
installed on the machine of course) is broken but simple enough. I
> > > A possibility could be: 1. build it for i386 only, 2. build it via
> > > buildworld without X11, regardless if X11 exists. If I want to use it
> > > with X11, it is interactive and I can make it for X11 by hand - it will
> > > not break on compile runs at some hour at night.
> >
> > I'll c
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Thomas Zenker wrote:
> >
> > A possibility could be: 1. build it for i386 only, 2. build it via
> > buildworld without X11, regardless if X11 exists. If I want to use it
> > with X11, it is interactive and I can make it for X11 by hand - it will
> >
Thomas Zenker wrote:
>
> A possibility could be: 1. build it for i386 only, 2. build it via
> buildworld without X11, regardless if X11 exists. If I want to use it
> with X11, it is interactive and I can make it for X11 by hand - it will
> not break on compile runs at some hour at night.
I'll co
> Actually i never used it under X11, but it is very important for
> us to have it to run cross-compilers (which are only available as
> DOS binaries) integrated with native development environment under
> FreeBSD.
>
> I am not sure how many people use it this way. But if it is not
> build in bui
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 12:10:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
> : doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
> : is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
> : from the source tree and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
: I think it's too system dependent to live in the source tree :-)
I don't. It is highly dependent on kernel elements.
: From the manpage:
: -x Open an X11 window to display output. This enables a variety in-
: terrupts not available
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
: doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
: is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
: from the source tree and make it a port (emulators/doscmd).
One can build it w/o X11. Doesn'
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 02:58:01PM +0100, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> [sent to both -current and -arch]
>
> Hi,
>
> doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
> is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
> from the source tree and make it a p
On Tue, 04 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Ok, but this means that we won't install doscmd with X11 support
> anymore. The user has to rebuild doscmd itself to have X11 support. In
> that case, it's better to have it in the ports collection...
I agree. Further, if X is not found, the port ca
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > > It uses wrong ifdefs for the X11 files :-). It should never find any X11
> > > files for building worlds, since there are no X11 includes or libraries
> > > under ${WORLDTMP}. Adding some ${DESTDIR}'s is probably a sufficient fix.
> >
> > Ok, but this means that we wo
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > But it doesn't depend on X11. It ifdefs some X11 files and only builds
> > the X11 version if X11 seems to be present.
>
> X11 can be present, but it won't necessarily be a usable X11. A i386
> cross-build on Alpha will u
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > [sent to both -current and -arch]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
> > is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
> > from the source tre
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> [sent to both -current and -arch]
>
> Hi,
>
> doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
> is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
> from the source tree and make it a port (emulators/doscmd
15 matches
Mail list logo
