On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 02:20:01AM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Yes, I know it's possible, but to provide a hack in one place istead of
> 20+ places (find /usr/ports -type f | xargs grep -l gcc_r | wc -l) is
> much easier both in the terms of efforts and testing required. After
> all, it would on
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:04:05PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> We need to be a little careful for ports that are supposed to work on
> RELENG_4 and -CURRENT.
RELENG_4 and -current are the same in this reguard. I should bump
__FreeBSD_version in both and then people can use that as the cut over
da
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > "David O'Brien" wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:53:29PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > > I wonder if anyone noticed that disappearance of libgcc_r will cause lot of
> > > > ports to break. Therefore it would be nice if some form of compatib
>
> "David O'Brien" wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:53:29PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > I wonder if anyone noticed that disappearance of libgcc_r will cause lot of
> > > ports to break. Therefore it would be nice if some form of compatibility sh
> im
> > > is provided, for example
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
> "David O'Brien" wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:53:29PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > I wonder if anyone noticed that disappearance of libgcc_r will cause lot of
> > > ports to break. Therefore it would be nice if some form of compatibility sh
>
"David O'Brien" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:53:29PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > I wonder if anyone noticed that disappearance of libgcc_r will cause lot of
> > ports to break. Therefore it would be nice if some form of compatibility sh
im
> > is provided, for example symlink from /
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:53:29PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> I wonder if anyone noticed that disappearance of libgcc_r will cause lot of
> ports to break. Therefore it would be nice if some form of compatibility shim
> is provided, for example symlink from /usr/lib/libgcc.a to /usr/lib/libgcc_
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if anyone noticed that disappearance of libgcc_r will cause lot of
> ports to break. Therefore it would be nice if some form of compatibility shim
> is provided, for example symlink from /usr/lib/libgcc.a to /usr/lib/libgcc_r.a
> automat
