Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> A> This seems to be a fallout of the recent UMA changes and its interaction
> A> with the per-cpu counter(9) system.
> A>
> A> Adding in and handing over to Gleb and Jeff as they touched this area last
.
>
> Ian has reported this panic several days before Jeff's changes :(
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:20:14PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> On 19.06.2013 11:34, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
A> > Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> >> On 19.06.2013 11:10, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
A> >>> Hi
A> >>>
A> >>> I'm seeing this panic quite regularly now. Most recent sighting on
r251858.
A> >>
A> >>
On 19.06.2013 11:34, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 19.06.2013 11:10, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Hi
I'm seeing this panic quite regularly now. Most recent sighting on r251858.
This panic message is not very informative and very hard to extract any
meaningful hints. Do you have a
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 19.06.2013 11:10, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm seeing this panic quite regularly now. Most recent sighting on r251858.
>
> This panic message is not very informative and very hard to extract any
> meaningful hints. Do you have a core dump and matching debug
On 19.06.2013 11:10, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Hi
I'm seeing this panic quite regularly now. Most recent sighting on r251858.
This panic message is not very informative and very hard to extract any
meaningful hints. Do you have a core dump and matching debug kernel?
--
Andre
cpuid = 15
KDB: st
