On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 10:37 +0100, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> On 1/13/21 10:07 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes! That works! Thank you!
> > >
> >
> > See:
> >
> >
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=bafb682656724d06045fa494efb83a4312036f1f
> >
> >
>
>
> Nice! Thanks again!
On 1/13/21 10:07 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Yes! That works! Thank you!
See:
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=bafb682656724d06045fa494efb83a4312036f1f
Nice! Thanks again!
Jakob
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https:/
Yes! That works! Thank you!
See:
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=bafb682656724d06045fa494efb83a4312036f1f
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any
On 1/12/21 6:10 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 2:46 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 2:40 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/12/21 2:16 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 1:43 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:54 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 19:56 +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 1/12/21 7:45 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > > - for (int i = 0; i <= sc->sc_npins; i++) {
> > > > + for (int i = 0; i != sc->sc_npins; i++) {
> > > > mtx_destroy(&sc->sc_pin_intr[i].mtx);
> > > >
On 1/12/21 7:45 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
- for (int i = 0; i <= sc->sc_npins; i++) {
+ for (int i = 0; i != sc->sc_npins; i++) {
mtx_destroy(&sc->sc_pin_intr[i].mtx);
free(&sc->sc_pin_intr[i].pin, M_GPIOC);
}
--HPS
If that is the problem, I'd
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 18:10 +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 1/12/21 2:46 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On 1/12/21 2:40 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/12/21 2:16 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > > On 1/12/21 1:43 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/12/2
On 1/12/21 2:46 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 2:40 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/12/21 2:16 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 1:43 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:54 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:32 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Alright, after a ne
On 1/12/21 2:40 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/12/21 2:16 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 1:43 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:54 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:32 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Alright, after a new bisect run I got a different result, so I most
On 1/12/21 2:16 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 1:43 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:54 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:32 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Alright, after a new bisect run I got a different result, so I most
likely did something wrong the first time.
On 1/12/21 1:43 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:54 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:32 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Alright, after a new bisect run I got a different result, so I most
likely did something wrong the first time.
ff3468ac94597efdcbc56f372528dfc98b114dac is th
On 1/12/21 12:54 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/12/21 12:32 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Alright, after a new bisect run I got a different result, so I most
likely did something wrong the first time.
ff3468ac94597efdcbc56f372528dfc98b114dac is the first bad commit
commit ff3468ac94597efdcb
On 1/12/21 12:32 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Alright, after a new bisect run I got a different result, so I most
likely did something wrong the first time.
ff3468ac94597efdcbc56f372528dfc98b114dac is the first bad commit
commit ff3468ac94597efdcbc56f372528dfc98b114dac
Author: Ian Lepore
Date:
On 1/12/21 9:33 AM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/11/21 7:08 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/11/21 5:24 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/11/21 1:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/11/21 11:12 AM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Updated my Acer laptop from r367734 to main-c255666-g1790f5e654f
On 1/11/21 7:08 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/11/21 5:24 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/11/21 1:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/11/21 11:12 AM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Updated my Acer laptop from r367734 to main-c255666-g1790f5e654f
Rebooting with the newly build kernel i get
On 1/11/21 5:24 PM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/11/21 1:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/11/21 11:12 AM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Updated my Acer laptop from r367734 to main-c255666-g1790f5e654f
Rebooting with the newly build kernel i get this panic.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while
On 1/11/21 6:07 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:24:39 +0100, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
On 1/11/21 1:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/11/21 11:12 AM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Updated my Acer laptop from r367734 to main-c255666-g1790f5e654f
Rebooting with the newly build ke
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:24:39 +0100, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
>
> On 1/11/21 1:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On 1/11/21 11:12 AM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
>>>
>>> Updated my Acer laptop from r367734 to main-c255666-g1790f5e654f
>>>
>>>
>>> Rebooting with the newly build kernel i get this panic.
>
On 1/11/21 1:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 1/11/21 11:12 AM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Updated my Acer laptop from r367734 to main-c255666-g1790f5e654f
Rebooting with the newly build kernel i get this panic.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 02
On 1/11/21 11:12 AM, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
Updated my Acer laptop from r367734 to main-c255666-g1790f5e654f
Rebooting with the newly build kernel i get this panic.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 02
fault virtual address = 0x103
fault
20 matches
Mail list logo
