> For trivial cases, the simplest solution would be to just remove
> /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd and have our native ldd do the work. If
> something depends on the switches, this won't work.
At http://huizen.dds.nl/~frodol/glibc/problems.html it says:
* ldd gives real strange output, sometime
Marc van Kempen wrote:
>
> > The only gain I see, if you can call it a gain, is that you can get
> > non-trivial information out of a shared object from within scripts, but
> > I don't know if this has been the reason. If you don't allow execution
> > of shared objects, you have to use dlopen(3)
> "Bruce A. Mah" wrote:
> >
> > If memory serves me right, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > > So, from a pure
> > > ELF layout point of view, both shared objects and executables are the
> > > same. But a shared library is not guaranteed to be executable. Allowing
> > > shared objects to be execut
"Bruce A. Mah" wrote:
>
> If memory serves me right, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > So, from a pure
> > ELF layout point of view, both shared objects and executables are the
> > same. But a shared library is not guaranteed to be executable. Allowing
> > shared objects to be executed is in violati
If memory serves me right, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> So, from a pure
> ELF layout point of view, both shared objects and executables are the
> same. But a shared library is not guaranteed to be executable. Allowing
> shared objects to be executed is in violation with the specs:
This may be a rea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > It's not a matter of our emulator. The problem is that Linux allows the
> > execution of shared objects. Technically speaking this is wrong and our
> > ELF loader doesn't do that. We can change our ELF loader, but that would
>
> Could you elaborate on this, please.
>
> It's not a matter of our emulator. The problem is that Linux allows the
> execution of shared objects. Technically speaking this is wrong and our
> ELF loader doesn't do that. We can change our ELF loader, but that would
Could you elaborate on this, please. I am interested in what is meant wi
"Donald J . Maddox" wrote:
>
> The Linux 'ldd' program is, as I'm sure you know, just a shell
> script that tries to directly execute 'ld-linux.so.2' on the
> filename passed in argv to the script. This doesn't work with our
> Linux emulation. Apparently, ld-linux.so.2 is simply (and not too
>
