Scott Long wrote:
>
> Rhett Monteg Hollander wrote:
>
> > Hello gentlemen,
> >
> > several days ago I've installed 5.0-RELEASE onto
one
> > of my machines, which already carried 4.7-RC1. To
> > avoid possible compatibility problems, I did a
clean
> > install onto another hard drive, and later
rec
Rhett Monteg Hollander wrote:
Hello gentlemen,
several days ago I've installed 5.0-RELEASE onto one
of my machines, which already carried 4.7-RC1. To
avoid possible compatibility problems, I did a clean
install onto another hard drive, and later recompiled
everything. Here I have a couple of ann
> You need to install the XFree86 a.out library package.
It's not needed for the bsdi-netscape ports, because those versions of
Netscape are statically linked. Most people don't need the a.out X
libraries for anything else.
--
Trevor Johnson
http://jpj.net/~trevor/gpgkey.txt
To Unsubscribe:
On 08-Sep-00 Bruce Burden wrote:
>since the native netscape doesn't bother to read any library path
>but the "standard" one, which of course points to ELF libraries,
>and not a.out ones...
You're supposed to use ldconfig -aout for that..
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engi
>
> I have installed netscape4-navigator and I can't launch its.
> I've got following message:
>
> ld.so failed: Can't find shared library "libXt.so.6.0"
>
Assuming you have the a.out libraries installed as per the
other messages, you probably need to assign the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
in
>
> Hi,
> I have installed netscape4-navigator and I can't launch its.
> I've got following message:
>
> ld.so failed: Can't find shared library "libXt.so.6.0"
>
> What can I do?
> Piotr Wozniak
You need to install the XFree86 a.out library package. It's
in the packages directory from the 4
On 08-Sep-00 Piotr Woniak wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed netscape4-navigator and I can't launch its.
> I've got following message:
>
> ld.so failed: Can't find shared library "libXt.so.6.0"
You are using the FreeBSD a.out version of Netscape. For this to work you need
the 2.2/3.x compat distr
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are the fixed in Netscape 4.74 bugs not critical for release?
>
> Who knows? I don't know of any changelog for Netscape.
Netscape 4.74 contains a fix for security critical bug in handling of
jpeg images. The bug was found and published on the 25th o
Adam wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Trevor Johnson wrote:
>
> >> > Are the fixed in Netscape 4.74 bugs not critical for release?
> >>
> >> Who knows? I don't know of any changelog for Netscape.
> >
> >The release notes are at
> >http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/4.7/relnotes/unix-4.74.html#what
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Trevor Johnson wrote:
>> > Are the fixed in Netscape 4.74 bugs not critical for release?
>>
>> Who knows? I don't know of any changelog for Netscape.
>
>The release notes are at
>http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/4.7/relnotes/unix-4.74.html#whatnew .
>The only change that
> > Are the fixed in Netscape 4.74 bugs not critical for release?
>
> Who knows? I don't know of any changelog for Netscape.
The release notes are at
http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/4.7/relnotes/unix-4.74.html#whatnew .
The only change that looks like it applies to us is a new feature to
de
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If there will be "FreeBSD 4.1-RC3+" will it contains the newer version of
> > Netscape?
>
> No - the ports collection for 4.1-RELEASE has been frozen.
>
> > Are the fixed in Netscape 4.74 bugs not critical for release?
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Netscape 4.74 is already out but FreeBSD 4.1-RC2 contains 4.73 version
> > > yet. Will FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE contains the last version (4.74) of
> > > Netscape Communicator and Navigator?
>
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If there will be "FreeBSD 4.1-RC3+" will it contains the newer version of
> Netscape?
No - the ports collection for 4.1-RELEASE has been frozen.
> Are the fixed in Netscape 4.74 bugs not critical for release?
Who knows? I don't know of any changel
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Netscape 4.74 is already out but FreeBSD 4.1-RC2 contains 4.73 version
> > yet. Will FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE contains the last version (4.74) of
> > Netscape Communicator and Navigator?
>
> No. The ports tree has been frozen.
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Netscape 4.74 is already out but FreeBSD 4.1-RC2 contains 4.73 version
> yet. Will FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE contains the last version (4.74) of
> Netscape Communicator and Navigator?
No. The ports tree has been frozen.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all o
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
> Over the past month, in -current, I've had weird problems with
> Mozilla. The message I'm seeing on stdout is
Perhaps you'd have benn luck taking this bug report to the mozilla
developers? I don't know there's anyone on this list who is truly familiar
w
"Dr. Brain" wrote:
>
> I've had a good deal of success getting Mozilla to build straight out of the
> nightly source tar files:
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mozilla-source.tar.gz
Over the past month, in -current, I've had weird problems with
Mozilla. The message I'm seeing
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
...
> Sounds like linux_pam would make a nice port.
No.
I don't think that the patch for linux_base:
--- Makefile.oldThu Apr 13 23:28:55 2000
+++ MakefileThu Apr 13 23:29:58 2000
@@ -90,2 +90,3 @@
readline-2.2.1-5.${MACH
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 12:17:03AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > I don't think pam is a development tool, which makes linux_devtools the
> > wrong port. I also don't think we need pam in any other port if it's
...
> In this case, you are right.
> The problem is generally that linux ports
On 11 Apr 2000, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> I was thinking about that too. Maybe you can make a few Linux library
> ports ("linux_graphics" etc.) so people who want to do something small
> don't necessarily have to install the whole enchilada.
>
> Please talk to me about repository
* From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Hmmm... I think we may as well break up linux_base in that case.
* linux_base is rather big as it is...
I was thinking about that too. Maybe you can make a few Linux library
ports ("linux_graphics" etc.) so people who want to do something small
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
...
> I don't think pam is a development tool, which makes linux_devtools the
> wrong port. I also don't think we need pam in any other port if it's
> needed in only one or two situations. Since the ports use rpms, you can
> always, and are free, to ins
On 11 Apr 2000, Dr. Brain wrote:
> I've had a good deal of success getting Mozilla to build straight out of the
> nightly source tar files:
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mozilla-source.tar.gz
>
> I recommend installing the jpeg and png libraries out of the ports tree and
>
Hi,
> Hmmm... I think we may as well break up linux_base in that case.
> linux_base is rather big as it is...
While you are at it, could you please add the pam-0.68-7.i386.rpm to
linux_devtools? It is needed by the SAP R/3 Installer.
Bye!
Michael Reifenberger
^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS
Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > Hmmm... I think we may as well break up linux_base in that case.
> > linux_base is rather big as it is...
> While you are at it, could you please add the pam-0.68-7.i386.rpm to
> linux_devtools? It is needed by the SAP R/3 Installer.
I don't think pam is a develop
I've had a good deal of success getting Mozilla to build straight out of the
nightly source tar files:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mozilla-source.tar.gz
I recommend installing the jpeg and png libraries out of the ports tree and
using a ~/.mozconfig with the following lines:
Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS SPS Perth wrote:
>
> It needed the libjpeg & libgtk rpms from the RedHat 6.1 CD (perhaps these
> could be added to Linux_base?)
Hmmm... I think we may as well break up linux_base in that case.
linux_base is rather big as it is...
Thanks for the feedback.
-
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > Hmm. My netscape works, but I didn't use merge that commit. I had already
> > inadvertly fixed the bug in another way while cleaning up.
> > ...
> > #if defined(COMPAT_43) || defined(COMPAT_SU
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> > Forget anything I said about KAME being the strong possibility :) As
> > soon as peter noted what commit it could have to do with, I figured
> > it out and fixed it; after testing, I committed it. Be happy :)
>
> You
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Hmm. My netscape works, but I didn't use merge that commit. I had already
> inadvertly fixed the bug in another way while cleaning up.
>
> Indeed, the proplem is checking the new context before checking that the
> context is actually new.
>
> Here is
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it's this commit to i386/machdep.c:
> ===
> revision 1.377
> date: 1999/11/21 14:46:43; author: pho; state: Exp; lines: +5 -5
> Moved useracc() to top of sigreturn as to avoid panic
> caused by invalid arguments to rutine.
>
> Reviewed
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> Forget anything I said about KAME being the strong possibility :) As
> soon as peter noted what commit it could have to do with, I figured
> it out and fixed it; after testing, I committed it. Be happy :)
Your fix suffers from exactly the same problem.. Suppo
Forget anything I said about KAME being the strong possibility :) As
soon as peter noted what commit it could have to do with, I figured
it out and fixed it; after testing, I committed it. Be happy :)
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! /
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 11:44:33AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> I'd be curious to know if this fixes it on a -current kernel (after rev 1.377
> of i386/machdep.c)
Yep, except this needs to come out:
> + scp = (struct osigcontext *)ucp;
> +
> + if (useracc((caddr_t)scp, sizeof (struct osigc
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it's this commit to i386/machdep.c:
Good call! A tree checked out with -D 1999-11-21 14:47 won't run netscape.
A kernel built with the same sources, except for 1.376 of i386/machdep.c
will.
David Scheidt
> ===
> revision 1.377
> date: 1
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it's this commit to i386/machdep.c:
> ===
> revision 1.377
> date: 1999/11/21 14:46:43; author: pho; state: Exp; lines: +5 -5
> Moved useracc() to top of sigreturn as to avoid panic
> caused by invalid arguments to rutine.
>
Thanks! Tes
"Daniel O'Connor" wrote:
>
> On 22-Nov-99 Steve Kargl wrote:
> > FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Nov 15 09:52:45 PST 1999
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/TROUTMASK
> > netscape (for FBSD) works fine.
>
> I have -current as of 19-Nov-99 and Netscape works fine (well as well at it
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
>
> > The same here. CURRENT updated and built on Sunday causes native
> > FreeBSD Netscape to lock up. Linux Netscape still works fine.
> >
>
> Happens here, too. Can someone with a machine to spare try the fol
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 22-Nov-99 Steve Kargl wrote:
> > FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Nov 15 09:52:45 PST 1999
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/TROUTMASK
> > netscape (for FBSD) works fine.
>
> I have -current as of 19-Nov-99 and Netscape works fine (w
On 22-Nov-99 Steve Kargl wrote:
> FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Nov 15 09:52:45 PST 1999
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/TROUTMASK
> netscape (for FBSD) works fine.
I have -current as of 19-Nov-99 and Netscape works fine (well as well at it
ever does..)
---
Daniel O'Connor softwar
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
>
> > The same here. CURRENT updated and built on Sunday causes native
> > FreeBSD Netscape to lock up. Linux Netscape still works fine.
> >
>
> Happens here, too. Can someone with a machin
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
>
> > The same here. CURRENT updated and built on Sunday causes native
> > FreeBSD Netscape to lock up. Linux Netscape still works fine.
> >
>
> Happens here, too. Can someone with a machine to spare try the fol
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
> The same here. CURRENT updated and built on Sunday causes native
> FreeBSD Netscape to lock up. Linux Netscape still works fine.
>
Happens here, too. Can someone with a machine to spare try the following:
1. Go back in date a week, and try the
The same here. CURRENT updated and built on Sunday causes native
FreeBSD Netscape to lock up. Linux Netscape still works fine.
On 22-Nov-99 Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> This happens with a kernel/world from today: netscape is unusable.
> Most of the time it freezes after a few seconds. Here is t
I am running FreeBSD 4.0. I have been seeing the empty core files from
netscape 4.61 and (as of last night) 4.7 for at least a week. I use
fvwm2 and afterstep-devel. The behavior seems to be independant of the
window manager. I rebuilt all my ports (including X and new X aout
files) with the new
I have had Linux communicator 4.6 core dump on me (signal 10) with an empty
core file a couple of times. However I hacked the linux_base port to install
a redhat 6 libraries in order to get glibc 2.1, so I don't know if this will
make any difference.
--
Eric Hodel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
| Is there anyone who is experienced Netscape crashes with 4.0-CURRENT when
| the close button is pressed (not always, but very often) ?
| It happens to me with 4.61 and 4.70 , it doesn't happen with 3.2-STABLE I
| have at work.
|
| Thanks ...
I have two 4.0-CURRENT machines, one with netscap
At 03/10/99, Chris Piazza wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:25:23AM -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:22:55PM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> >
> > > Is there anyone who is experienced Netscape crashes with 4.0-CURRENT
> when
> > > the close button is pressed (not alw
Chris Piazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Disable Javascript and the problem will go away (ugh).
I have JavaScript disabled by default. Still, navigator frequently
crashes on close or (I couldn't care less) exit.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscr
That's odd, I have not been able to make netscape crash.
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and student at The | AIM: AgR
Gianmarco Giovannelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyone who is experienced Netscape crashes with 4.0-CURRENT when
> the close button is pressed (not always, but very often) ?
Same here. Navigator 4.61. Previous versions didn't show this behavior.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:25:23AM -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:22:55PM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone who is experienced Netscape crashes with 4.0-CURRENT when
> > the close button is pressed (not always, but very often) ?
> > It happens to me
At 03/10/99, James Howard wrote:
>On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone who is experienced Netscape crashes with 4.0-CURRENT when
> > the close button is pressed (not always, but very often) ?
> > It happens to me with 4.61 and 4.70 , it doesn't happen with 3.2-STA
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:22:55PM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> Is there anyone who is experienced Netscape crashes with 4.0-CURRENT when
> the close button is pressed (not always, but very often) ?
> It happens to me with 4.61 and 4.70 , it doesn't happen with 3.2-STABLE I
> have at w
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> Is there anyone who is experienced Netscape crashes with 4.0-CURRENT when
> the close button is pressed (not always, but very often) ?
> It happens to me with 4.61 and 4.70 , it doesn't happen with 3.2-STABLE I
> have at work.
I have had probl
"Kevin G. Eliuk" wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Kevin G. Eliuk wrote:
> >
> > I installed linux-netscape-4.08 and it opens with bus error or signal 10.
>
> That should be "without"
I've applied Bruce Evans's patch to egcs to work around (yet anot
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Kevin G. Eliuk wrote:
>
> I installed linux-netscape-4.08 and it opens with bus error or signal 10.
That should be "without"
--
Regards,
Kevin G. Eliuk
Box 67, Granthams Landing, BC VON 1X0 (604)886-4040
Discover Rock Solid
> They went away after I nuked all prior traces of Navigator, including
> my .netscape directory (you should rename it :-)
that was it. i cleaned out much of .netscrape and it worked fine. thanks.
randy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in t
> % netscape
> no recognized font charsets!
>
> 3.1-stable as of today
> navigator 4.5 freshly installed
I had similiar font problems when installing Navigator 4.5 under
Solaris 2.6.
They went away after I nuked all prior traces of Navigator, including
my .netscape directory (you should rename
> For quite some time now Netscape 4.5 has been very unstable on my
> -current system. I've cvsup'ed and made world many times in the hope the
> problem would go away.
>
> Today I decided to ktrace it, and see where it would stop.
>
> Of course it now refuses to crash. Even on java stuff that wou
Chris Tubutis writes:
> > whenever I click a mailto: HREF it inadvertly dumps core.
>
>
> Does it truly dump core, or does it merely go away?
Can't speak for the original poster, but my Netscrap 4.5 shows the same
behaviour:
[16]a...@darkstar:/alex #>/usr/local/netscape/netscape
[now clicki
On 07-Feb-99 Chris Tubutis wrote:
> Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
>> whenever I click a mailto: HREF it inadvertly dumps core.
> Does it truly dump core, or does it merely go away?
No, it really dumps core.
---
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Wervenjoin #FreeBSD on Undernet
asmodai(at)wxs.nl
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
>
> OK,
>
> found another reproducable coredumper:
>
> whenever I click a mailto: HREF it inadvertly dumps core.
Does it truly dump core, or does it merely go away? It's a known problem with
Communicrasher 4.5 on UNIX platforms that trying to use any of the mail
On 28-Jan-99 Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Luke:
>> This is 4.5b1 communicator, and locks up X often enough I dont use it.
>
> Beta versions of 4.5 were bad (in that case b2 was far worse than b1)
> whereas 4.5 release is more or less stable. (it still crashes from time to
> time but not
On 28-Jan-99 Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Luke:
>> linux_lib port. [why does it install into / anyways]
>
> The standard sysinstall has been making a link into /usr/compat for months
> if not years :-)
Some people haven't used sysinstall for years :>
E-Mail: Luke
Sent by XFMai
According to Luke:
> This is 4.5b1 communicator, and locks up X often enough I dont use it.
Beta versions of 4.5 were bad (in that case b2 was far worse than b1)
whereas 4.5 release is more or less stable. (it still crashes from time to
time but not that often).
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD:
According to Luke:
> linux_lib port. [why does it install into / anyways]
The standard sysinstall has been making a link into /usr/compat for months
if not years :-)
revision 1.193
date: 1997/07/16 11:45:48; author: jkh; state: Exp; lines: +5 -1
ln /compat to /usr/
> * From: Luke
>
> * linux_lib port. [why does it install into / anyways]
>
> You can put it anywhere and symlink to it, like sysinstall does now,
> but it has to be called "/compat" (or some other well-known place)
> because of the implementation. The string "/compat/linux" has to be
> hardc
* From: Luke
* linux_lib port. [why does it install into / anyways]
You can put it anywhere and symlink to it, like sysinstall does now,
but it has to be called "/compat" (or some other well-known place)
because of the implementation. The string "/compat/linux" has to be
hardcoded in the linu
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Luke wrote:
> > I wrote a port for Linux Netscape if anyone wants it. I sent it in but it
> > came back to me with some comments about netscape port proliferation.
>
> I tried that one but it wants linux_lib installed on /compat and
> theres
> no room. Do you know if
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 12:35:09PM -0500, Luke wrote:
> what is this VM_STACK option?
Its some new code to manage "autogrow" stacks. The existing (old) code
made a process stack autogrow. But, its useful to be able to create
additional autogrow memory regions to use as thread stacks in
> Should not harm anything. I have linked /compat/linux to /home/linux
> (home is on its own filesystem), since my / is quite limited
> in space.
>
> No problems (and I don't really know why it should cause any).
h24-64-221-247# ls -al /compat
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Oct 22 05:47 /compat ->
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Luke wrote:
> I tried that one but it wants linux_lib installed on /compat and
> theres
> no room. Do you know if its ok to make /compat a link to somewhere else for
> the
> linux_lib port. [why does it install into / anyways]
Should not harm anything. I have linked
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 02:20:32PM -0500, Luke wrote:
> I tried that one but it wants linux_lib installed on /compat and
> theres
> no room. Do you know if its ok to make /compat a link to somewhere else for
> the
> linux_lib port. [why does it install into / anyways]
I have /compat sym
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Luke wrote:
> > I wrote a port for Linux Netscape if anyone wants it. I sent it in but it
> > came back to me with some comments about netscape port proliferation.
>
> I tried that one but it wants linux_lib installed on /compat and
> theres
> no room. Do you know if
> I wrote a port for Linux Netscape if anyone wants it. I sent it in but it
> came back to me with some comments about netscape port proliferation.
I tried that one but it wants linux_lib installed on /compat and theres
no room. Do you know if its ok to make /compat a link to somewhere els
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Jason C. Wells wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
>>This I can answer - all versions of netscape are aout, (I've
>>just been looking for an elf netscape so that I can throw away my aout
>>libraries which are being carried around only for netscape
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>This I can answer - all versions of netscape are aout, (I've
>just been looking for an elf netscape so that I can throw away my aout
>libraries which are being carried around only for netscape nowadays).
I wrote a port for Linux Netscape if
> Also, anyone even bothered to file the communicator 4.5 binary?
Hopefully this helps [4.0-current -DNOSECURE -O2 -pipe]
Netscape: FreeBSD/i386 compact demand paged dynamically linked executable
This is 4.5b1 communicator, and locks up X often enough I dont use it.
netscape.bin: unknown
On 27-Jan-99 Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On 27-Jan-99 Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
>> Might the old communicator still being tied to a.out?
>
> This I can answer - all versions of netscape are aout, (I've
> just been looking for an elf netscape so that I can throw away my aout
> librarie
On 27-Jan-99 Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> OK,
>
> just to re-organise something here:
>
> Might the old communicator still being tied to a.out?
This I can answer - all versions of netscape are aout, (I've
just been looking for an elf netscape so that I can throw away my aout
librarie
82 matches
Mail list logo
