:
:It looks like you guys got it! What is currently checked in (by Assar)
:is working fine! :-)
:
:M
Excellent news!
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
It looks like you guys got it! What is currently checked in (by Assar)
is working fine! :-)
M
> :--=-=-=
> :
> :Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :> Well, yes... that's essentially what I suggested. You didn't say
> :> anything about removing the externalized inlines, which is w
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a reliable panic on CURRENT (2000/12/26) with INVARIANTS
> > set. I suppose I could "fix" this by taking out INVARIANTS, but it
> > seems to make more sense to try to get it fixed.
>
> Do you have NFS compiled in to
:--=-=-=
:
:Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> Well, yes... that's essentially what I suggested. You didn't say
:> anything about removing the externalized inlines, which is what you
:> do in your patch. Looks like a fine patch to me.
:
:Except it didn't work. Now here's a
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, yes... that's essentially what I suggested. You didn't say
> anything about removing the externalized inlines, which is what you
> do in your patch. Looks like a fine patch to me.
Except it didn't work. Now here's a patch that survive
:Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> We can't just go do an end-run around the established API as a
:> hack around the problem.
:
:I fail too se how my suggestion would change the API at all, but in
:case I was unclear, diffs are below.
:
:/assar
:
Well, yes... that's essential
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We can't just go do an end-run around the established API as a
> hack around the problem.
I fail too se how my suggestion would change the API at all, but in
case I was unclear, diffs are below.
/assar
Index: vm_zone.c
:
:Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> I think the only real solution is to rip out the externally visible
:> zalloc/zfree inlines and replace them with real routines. I will happily
:> do this, those inlines have always been an eyesore to me and the
:> performance benefit
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the only real solution is to rip out the externally visible
> zalloc/zfree inlines and replace them with real routines. I will happily
> do this, those inlines have always been an eyesore to me and the
> performance benefit is mini
:Do you have NFS compiled in to the kernel? I've had trouble using
:INVARIANTS in the kernel and NFS as a module many times - it always
:panics in the zone allocation stuff.
:
:(Either you always need to compile modules with the same INVARIENTS
:options as the kernel, or we need to fix INVARIENTS
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> I'm getting a reliable panic on CURRENT (2000/12/26) with INVARIANTS
> set. I suppose I could "fix" this by taking out INVARIANTS, but it
> seems to make more sense to try to get it fixed.
Do you have NFS compiled in to the kernel? I
:Hi Matt
:
:I'm getting a reliable panic on CURRENT (2000/12/26) with INVARIANTS
:set. I suppose I could "fix" this by taking out INVARIANTS, but it
:seems to make more sense to try to get it fixed.
:
:The panic() is "freeing free entry", and the traceback (minus most
:of the numbers) is:
:
:panic
12 matches
Mail list logo
