Hiten Pandya writes:
> Brooks Davis (Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:15:16AM -0800) wrote:
> > Not to mention:
> >
> > netinet6/{in6_pcb.c,in6_src.c,ip6_input.c,ip6_output.c,nd6.c}
>
> > What is gained by making loopback default?
>
> Nothing is gained. But it's neccessary fix this, IMHO. Not
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:29:30PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> > What is gained by making loopback default?
>
> Nothing is gained. But it's neccessary fix this, IMHO. Not to mention
> that our loopback device code looks terribly ugly anyway. :-)
I certaintly agree the loop interface could use
Brooks Davis (Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:15:16AM -0800) wrote:
> Not to mention:
>
> netinet6/{in6_pcb.c,in6_src.c,ip6_input.c,ip6_output.c,nd6.c}
> What is gained by making loopback default?
Nothing is gained. But it's neccessary fix this, IMHO. Not to mention
that our loopback device code looks
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:06:32PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Brooks Davis (Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:00:11AM -0800) wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:38:54PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> > > To conclude, I would like to see the loopback device made default, and
> > > if this is not agreed upon
Brooks Davis (Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:00:11AM -0800) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:38:54PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> > To conclude, I would like to see the loopback device made default, and
> > if this is not agreed upon, then someone needs to fix case when loopback
> > device is not in th
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:38:54PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> To conclude, I would like to see the loopback device made default, and
> if this is not agreed upon, then someone needs to fix case when loopback
> device is not in the kernel config, and is going to be loaded as a
> module.
What is g
