Re: LINT broken?

2001-09-09 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 09:01:50PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Is anyone else seeing this? This was build failure of a -current LINT > under RELENG_4. As far as I can tell I'm up to date. Verified and fixed. Thanks, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To U

Re: LINT broken?

2001-09-09 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 09:01:50PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Is anyone else seeing this? This was build failure of a -current LINT > under RELENG_4. As far as I can tell I'm up to date. > > Kris > > cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls >-Wnested-externs

Re: LINT broken. (in_cksum changes)

2000-05-09 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 01:49:51AM +0900, MIHIRA Yoshiro wrote: > >> > On Sun, 7 May 2000, Nick Hibma wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Is it only me that ever compiles LINT? The checksum changes went in a > >> > > few days ago. > >> > > > >> > > Please, people, when you move code around or chang

Re: LINT broken. (in_cksum changes)

2000-05-09 Thread MIHIRA Yoshiro
>> > On Sun, 7 May 2000, Nick Hibma wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Is it only me that ever compiles LINT? The checksum changes went in a >> > > few days ago. >> > > >> > > Please, people, when you move code around or change a function that is >> > > used in more than a fixed set of files, compile LI

Re: LINT broken. (in_cksum changes)

2000-05-09 Thread Nick Hibma
Appart from that, ipf does not load as a kld anymore. And probably, not tried, the IPFILTER option in any kernel would break the build as well. Nick On Mon, 8 May 2000, Wes Morgan wrote: > I sent a note to the committer on these last night. LINT must need some > modification, because the error

Re: LINT broken. (in_cksum changes)

2000-05-08 Thread Wes Morgan
I sent a note to the committer on these last night. LINT must need some modification, because the error is also present in netinet6/ipsec.c. There are some ifdef's around it that point to LINT needing some extra options. On Sun, 7 May 2000, Nick Hibma wrote: > > Is it only me that ever compiles

Re: Lint broken in -current.

1999-11-23 Thread David O'Brien
> Lint no longer works in -current as cpp seems to have lost the -undef > option. Yes, looking into `cpp' is on my list of things to do. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: LINT broken!

1999-04-02 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> n file included from ../../ntfs/ntfs_vnops.c:66: > ../../ntfs/ntfs.h:29: warning: `DIAGNOSTIC' redefined > opt_global.h:13: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wi