At 11:29 AM -0400 8/16/01, Robert Watson wrote:
>This is way cool stuff. I assume these are done based on i386 stack frame
>layouts? Running on other platforms will result in different alignment
>(minor issue, as most of the time it will just be a few bytes here or
>there), and some different co
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
> of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
Julian,
This is way cool stuff. I assume these are done based on i386 stack frame
layouts? Running on other platforms will result in different alig
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
> of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
Very cool!
None of these are dangerous for the stuff I've done so far.
Someone else anticipated the question I was going to ask: thanks
for the patch, too!
-- Terry
T
I guess so, I started from the code that was on the gcc web page..
did you send me something new?
(I sent you a copy of the final version.. di you miss it?
I missed yours :-)
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:00:50PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I port
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:00:50PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
> of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
Actually I thought I did. :-) Is your final patch different from the
one I did and sent you?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Rex Luo wrote:
>
> May I ask where to get this utility?
> Thanks!
It's beeing added to gcc in -current..
here are my patches: WARNING..CUT_N_PASTE.. will not patch cleanly.
Index: calls.c
===
RCS file: /
May I ask where to get this utility?
Thanks!
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
> of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
>
> I tried it ou ton a compile of GENERIC.
> it produced some 360 functions that allocate over 100 byte
