Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 06/23/11 17:17, Alexander Motin wrote: Nathan Whitehorn wrote: I'm still having problems with an ATA bus containing a DVD drive and a Zip driver (da). Can't it be some different problem? What are the symptoms? Hanging in run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks, immediately after probing the zi

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Alexander Motin
Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > I'm still having problems with an ATA bus containing a DVD drive and a > Zip driver (da). Can't it be some different problem? What are the symptoms? -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 06/23/11 16:57, Hartmann, O. wrote: On 06/23/11 18:29, David Wolfskill wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:12:54PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: ... SVN rev 223443 broke ATAPI support. SVN rev 223475 should fix it. Thanks -- that did resolve the issue for me. Peace, david Me, too. Thanks,

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 06/23/11 18:29, David Wolfskill wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:12:54PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: ... SVN rev 223443 broke ATAPI support. SVN rev 223475 should fix it. Thanks -- that did resolve the issue for me. Peace, david Me, too. Thanks, Oliver _

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:12:54PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > ... > SVN rev 223443 broke ATAPI support. SVN rev 223475 should fix it. Thanks -- that did resolve the issue for me. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Alexander Motin
O. Hartmann wrote: > With today's update of sources > (Revision: 223466 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: adrian > Last Changed Rev: 223466 > Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box get

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:10:20PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 23.06.2011 11:54, O. Hartmann wrote: > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box gets stuck in booting > > the kernel and ending up > > with the message (repeated every 60 seconds): > > > > run_interrupt_driven_

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread O. Hartmann
On 06/23/11 13:10, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 23.06.2011 11:54, O. Hartmann wrote: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box gets stuck in booting the kernel and ending up with the message (repeated every 60 seconds): run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 23.06.11 09:54, O. Hartmann wrote: With today's update of sources (Revision: 223466 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: adrian Last Changed Rev: 223466 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:54:46AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > With today's update of sources > (Revision: 223466 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: adrian > Last Changed Rev: 223466 > Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) > > FreeBSD 9.0-CUR

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 23.06.2011 11:54, O. Hartmann wrote: > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box gets stuck in booting > the kernel and ending up > with the message (repeated every 60 seconds): > > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config > > What's up? I backed

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 23.06.2011 11:54, O. Hartmann wrote: > With today's update of sources > (Revision: 223466 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: adrian > Last Changed Rev: 223466 > Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) > > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot

Re: Kernel broken at sysv_msg.c

2003-01-26 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:58:52PM -0800, walt wrote: > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /usr/src/sys/kern/sysv_msg.c: In function `msgsnd': > /usr/src/sys/kern/sysv_msg.c:775: warning: cast discards qualifiers from > pointer target type > /usr/src/sys/kern/sysv_msg.c:818: warning: cast dis

Re: Kernel broken

2002-11-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-11-26 19:21, Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/sound/isa/ad1816.c,v 1.24 2002/06/09 14:20:17 hm Exp $ > > [...] > > cg's latest commit (Tuesday) makes the above change and fixes these > e

Re: Kernel broken

2002-11-26 Thread Ray Kohler
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2002-11-26 16:33, Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > > > > CVSuped (2 mins ago) -current kernel is broken: >

Re: Kernel broken

2002-11-26 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-11-26 16:33, Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > > > CVSuped (2 mins ago) -current kernel is broken: > > > > > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > > > /usr/src/sys/dev/soun

Re: Kernel broken

2002-11-26 Thread Gary Jennejohn
> -Original Message- > From: Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jan Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:12:37 -0500 > Subject: Re: Kernel broken > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > > CVSuped

Re: Re: Kernel broken

2002-11-26 Thread Dheeraj
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:12:37 -0500 Subject: Re: Kernel broken On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > CVSuped (2 mins ago) -current kernel is broken: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/isa/ad1816.c: In function `ad1816_lock'

Re: Kernel broken

2002-11-26 Thread Mark Santcroos
Changing the locks from "void *" to "struct mtx *" seems to fix the problem. Mark diff -u -r ../../../../vendor/sys/dev/sound/isa/ad1816.c ./isa/ad1816.c --- ../../../../vendor/sys/dev/sound/isa/ad1816.c Thu Nov 14 17:00:39 2002 +++ ./isa/ad1816.c Tue Nov 26 13:03:17 2002 @@ -53,7 +53,

Re: Kernel broken

2002-11-26 Thread Ray Kohler
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > CVSuped (2 mins ago) -current kernel is broken: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/isa/ad1816.c: In function `ad1816_lock': > /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/isa/ad1816.c:81: warning: dereferencing `void *' > poi

Re: kernel broken? (devfs maybe?)

2002-10-25 Thread Julian Elischer
that fixes it.. thanks On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Please try the rev 1.418 of vfs_subr.c > > >> db> tr > >> v_incr_usecount(c1d76cb8,,c037b472,863,cc34a92c) at > >> v_incr_usecount+0x48vrele(c1d76cb8,c1c90a00,c036cc7a,6,100) at > >> vrele+0xb0 > >> addaliasu(

Re: kernel broken? (devfs maybe?)

2002-10-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Please try the rev 1.418 of vfs_subr.c >> db> tr >> v_incr_usecount(c1d76cb8,,c037b472,863,cc34a92c) at >> v_incr_usecount+0x48vrele(c1d76cb8,c1c90a00,c036cc7a,6,100) at >> vrele+0xb0 >> addaliasu(c1d76cb8,402,c1cb6200,cc34a9c0,c1d73b00) at addaliasu+0x1ad >> devfs_allocv(c1d8f880,c1c

Re: Re: kernel broken? (devfs maybe?)

2002-10-25 Thread Julian Elischer
yep that fixes it.. On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Try backing out phk's src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c 1.416 > Does that help? > > Drew > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Re: kernel broken? (devfs maybe?)

2002-10-24 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Try backing out phk's src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c 1.416 Does that help? Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: kernel broken? (devfs maybe?)

2002-10-24 Thread Julian Elischer
nope.. not mine..(just backed everything out here and retested.. still got it..) don't know if the lock reversal is related... That may be an orthogonal bug.. On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I thought this might be one on mine, but > it doesn't look like mine.. > > (I'm busy r

Re: kernel broken in ip_fw2.c

2002-10-24 Thread Maxime Henrion
Dennis Kristensen wrote: > Hi! > > Looks like kernel is broken without the bellow patch. The below patch is incorrect, I just forgot to commit changes to ip_fw.h. This should be fixed now. Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the b

Re: kernel broken(?) at vfs_mount.c

2002-09-24 Thread Jeff Roberson
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c: In function `checkdirs': > /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1141: warning: implicit declaration of function >`vrefcnt' Oops, I commited this file before I commited a dependency. Please cvsup again. Specifically, you need the

Re: Kernel broken

2001-12-26 Thread Jan Stocker
Xcuse me...overread it... Jan On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 19:46, Maxime Henrion wrote: > Jan Stocker wrote: > > Sources from: Dec, 26 11:28 CET > > > > linking kernel > > procfs.o: In function `procfs_init': > > procfs.o(.text+0x1ac): undefined reference to `pfs_create_link' > > procfs.o(.text+0x1c0

Re: Kernel broken

2001-12-26 Thread Maxime Henrion
Jan Stocker wrote: > Sources from: Dec, 26 11:28 CET > > linking kernel > procfs.o: In function `procfs_init': > procfs.o(.text+0x1ac): undefined reference to `pfs_create_link' > procfs.o(.text+0x1c0): undefined reference to `pfs_create_dir' > procfs.o(.text+0x1db): undefined reference to `pfs_c

Re: kernel broken in two places

2001-05-23 Thread Michael Harnois
Well, I deleted /usr/src/sys/, cvsup'd again, and now make depend works. Who knows ... -- Michael D. Harnois[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redeemer Lutheran Church Washburn, Iowa Be radical, be as radical as you can ... because radicals empo

Re: kernel broken in two places

2001-05-23 Thread Michael Harnois
Dima Dorfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Are you compiling without "options INET"? No, that I could have figured out. -- Michael D. Harnois[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redeemer Lutheran Church Washburn, Iowa CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose f

Re: kernel broken in two places

2001-05-23 Thread Dima Dorfman
Michael Harnois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unless I missed a heads-up somewhere ... > > mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/dev -I > @/../include /usr/src/sys/modules/if_sl/../../net/if_sl.c /usr/src/sys/modul > es/if_sl/../../net/slcompress.c > /usr/src/sys

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-12 Thread A . Leidinger
On 12 Okt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You can try the patch in (my) PR 'kern/14278'. Works. Bye, Alexander. -- What do you mean, my birth certificate expired? http://netchild.home.pages.de A.Leidinger+Home @ WJPServer.CS.Uni-SB.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-12 Thread nnd
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11 Oct, Bill Fumerola wrote: > >>> #makeoptionsCONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin >> >> We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we > > As Bruce Evans already said, It's documented. > >> don't n

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-12 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 11 Oct, Bill Fumerola wrote: >> #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin > > We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we As Bruce Evans already said, It's documented. > don't need to go hunting down oddities. :> Have you seen the '#' in "#makeoptions"? I assume a '#'

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread Bruce Evans
> >>Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option ^^^ > >> > >> #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin > > > > We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option > > #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin This option is used in LINT to help expose such errors before they are committed. > be

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we > > don't need to go hunting down oddities. :> > > Does it mean that I throw away my PR with patches to > the 'newpcm' files which add 'abs' definition and therefore > ma

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread nnd
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bill Fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option >> >> #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin > > We have enough bre

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option > > #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we don't need to go hunti

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread nnd
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option #makeoptionsCONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin because there is NO 'abs' function/macro in this files (ac97.c, channel.c and mss.c) and they can be only compiled using gcc's builtin