Re: Intel GPU driver import

2012-05-14 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:31:38PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 13/05/2012 00:39 Konstantin Belousov said the following: > > With r235375, all required VM support for new Intel GPU driver was > > committed into HEAD. There are still some things to improve and > > change, but now the all.14.9.pat

Re: Intel GPU driver import

2012-05-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 13/05/2012 00:39 Konstantin Belousov said the following: > With r235375, all required VM support for new Intel GPU driver was > committed into HEAD. There are still some things to improve and > change, but now the all.14.9.patch does not touch anything outside agp > or drm. This allows to start

Re: Intel GPU driver import

2012-05-14 Thread Artem Tuchinsky
On some laptops they didn't work with xf86-video-intel 2.7/2.9, this bug fixed in 2.11 and above, which does not work without GEM/KMS 2012/5/14 Konstantin Belousov : >> What is Gen2-3 hardware in this context? Can you give examples? > It is 810/815/865/915/945/G33/IDG chipsets. They currently wor

Re: Intel GPU driver import

2012-05-14 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:39:35AM +0200, Joel Dahl wrote: > On 13-05-2012 0:39, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > The positive points to the second approach is that we still have older > > kernel drivers around. Also, I have more freedom in changing the DRM > > core, without fearing breakage in the

Re: Intel GPU driver import

2012-05-14 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (13/05/2012 00:39), Konstantin Belousov wrote: > With r235375, all required VM support for new Intel GPU driver was > committed into HEAD. There are still some things to improve and > change, but now the all.14.9.patch does not touch anything outside agp > or drm. This allows to start the proce

Re: Intel GPU driver import

2012-05-13 Thread Joel Dahl
On 13-05-2012 0:39, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > The positive points to the second approach is that we still have older > kernel drivers around. Also, I have more freedom in changing the DRM > core, without fearing breakage in the DRI1 land. Since I do not really > want to deal with Gen2-3 hardwar

Re: Intel GPU driver import

2012-05-12 Thread Chuck Burns
On 5/12/2012 4:39 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > My own preference is to implement second choice and put the driver > into dev/drm2. Is there a way to have an OPTION in the config file build one driver, and without the OPTION to build the other, but use the same name? If so, that might be t