On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:31:38PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/05/2012 00:39 Konstantin Belousov said the following:
> > With r235375, all required VM support for new Intel GPU driver was
> > committed into HEAD. There are still some things to improve and
> > change, but now the all.14.9.pat
on 13/05/2012 00:39 Konstantin Belousov said the following:
> With r235375, all required VM support for new Intel GPU driver was
> committed into HEAD. There are still some things to improve and
> change, but now the all.14.9.patch does not touch anything outside agp
> or drm. This allows to start
On some laptops they didn't work with xf86-video-intel 2.7/2.9, this
bug fixed in 2.11 and above, which does not work without GEM/KMS
2012/5/14 Konstantin Belousov :
>> What is Gen2-3 hardware in this context? Can you give examples?
> It is 810/815/865/915/945/G33/IDG chipsets. They currently wor
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:39:35AM +0200, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On 13-05-2012 0:39, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > The positive points to the second approach is that we still have older
> > kernel drivers around. Also, I have more freedom in changing the DRM
> > core, without fearing breakage in the
On (13/05/2012 00:39), Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> With r235375, all required VM support for new Intel GPU driver was
> committed into HEAD. There are still some things to improve and
> change, but now the all.14.9.patch does not touch anything outside agp
> or drm. This allows to start the proce
On 13-05-2012 0:39, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> The positive points to the second approach is that we still have older
> kernel drivers around. Also, I have more freedom in changing the DRM
> core, without fearing breakage in the DRI1 land. Since I do not really
> want to deal with Gen2-3 hardwar
On 5/12/2012 4:39 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> My own preference is to implement second choice and put the driver
> into dev/drm2.
Is there a way to have an OPTION in the config file build one driver,
and without the OPTION to build the other, but use the same name? If so,
that might be t