On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:27:08PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:03:36PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:49:13PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:59:58PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > > Just a headsup for anyone
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:03:36PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:49:13PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:59:58PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > Just a headsup for anyone doing numerical work with
> > > > FreeBSD-current. clang with optimiz
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:03:36PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:49:13PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:59:58PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > Just a headsup for anyone doing numerical work with
> > > FreeBSD-current. clang with optimization of -
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:49:13PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:59:58PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Just a headsup for anyone doing numerical work with
> > FreeBSD-current. clang with optimization of -O1 or
> > higher produces wrong results. Testing 1 million
> > comp
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:59:58PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Just a headsup for anyone doing numerical work with
> FreeBSD-current. clang with optimization of -O1 or
> higher produces wrong results. Testing 1 million
> complex values of ccoshf and limiting |z| < 20,
> shows
>
This is either