On 06/02/2012 18:24, JD wrote:
dmesg no longer outputs the kernel messages.
$ dmesg
$
$ which dmesg
/sbin/dmesg
$what /sbin/dmesg
/sbin/dmesg:
So, I have no idea what version of dmesg got installed.
Anyone on 9.0 Release have this problem? How to fix it?
I thought this was by design, I've no
Am 06.02.2012 18:24, schrieb JD:
> dmesg no longer outputs the kernel messages.
>
> $ dmesg
> $
> $ which dmesg
> /sbin/dmesg
> $what /sbin/dmesg
> /sbin/dmesg:
>
> So, I have no idea what version of dmesg got installed.
>
> Anyone on 9.0 Release have this problem? How to fix it?
What does "dme
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 09:24 -0800, JD wrote:
> dmesg no longer outputs the kernel messages.
>
> $ dmesg
> $
> $ which dmesg
> /sbin/dmesg
> $what /sbin/dmesg
> /sbin/dmesg:
>
> So, I have no idea what version of dmesg got installed.
>
> Anyone on 9.0 Release have this problem? How to fix it?
> _
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I'd check and make sure the filesystem isn't corrupt for starters.
> Cheers,
well, I did fsck -fy in single user before copy paste
/var/crash/core.txt.5 to this mailing list.
-dikshie-
___
freeb
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:05 AM, dikshie wrote:
> Hi,
> can some enlighten me what's happen in my FreeBSD-9.0 box.
>
> thanks!
I'd check and make sure the filesystem isn't corrupt for starters.
Cheers,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing l
> On 18/11/2011 10:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9
> > Am I screwed, am I OK, or do I simply have to rerun csup with RELENG_9_0
> > instead of RELENG_9 ?
> Not screwed, but you'll be running 9.0-PRERELEASE rather than 9.0-RC2.
> If you want to switch to
On 18/11/2011 18:21, George Kontostanos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Luchesar V. ILIEV
> wrote:
>> On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (h
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Luchesar V. ILIEV
wrote:
> On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
>>> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head)
>>> you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like t
On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
>> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head)
>> you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like to access the source tree
>> via SVN it is "svn://svn.freebsd.org
On 18/11/2011 10:53, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9
>
> Am I screwed, am I OK, or do I simply have to rerun csup with RELENG_9_0
> instead of RELENG_9 ?
Not screwed, but you'll be running 9.0-PRERELEASE rather than 9.0-RC2.
If you want to switch to the 9.0-RELEASE bra
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:53:38AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
> > tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head)
> > you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like to access the source tree
> > via SVN it
> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head)
> you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like to access the source tree
> via SVN it is "svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.0/". We still have
> the nit th
Can you run the crashing app under gdb and show me where it
crashes? What is the cause of the crash? SIGILL or something like
that? What instruction does it crash on?
Thank you, roman
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:46:37AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Operating systems in question: FreeBSD 9.0-RC1/amd
On Monday 31 October 2011 17:05:06 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> The problem caused by the messages is at least the time used to
generate
> them .
Some of these have been removed in the latest kdelibs4 port.
> Starting of KDE4 or its parts are taking a long time with respect to
other
> system
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2011 02:34:11 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > In a message previously I mentioned the KDE4 problem for 8.2 amd64
> Release
> > , but that message even did not receive a single reply .
>
> Things just may get lost, sor
* Ruslan Yakovlev , 20111028 17:45:
> nvenetlib.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `array'
>
> tws_services.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here
G! $#(*@!&(*!@&#
I think you can work around this by removing either nve or tws.
I guess problems like these are mainly caused by the fact that we
On Thursday 27 October 2011 02:34:11 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> In a message previously I mentioned the KDE4 problem for 8.2 amd64
Release
> , but that message even did not receive a single reply .
Things just may get lost, sorry.
> Install X .
> Install KDE4 .
> Login to console .
> Without
You could try something like:
script startx
Then exit X when it's done, and the script command should've put the
output into a text file for you.
adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cu
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> wrote:
> > The KDE4 in FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 amd64 is generating enormous amount of error
> > messages during usage ( not visible on screen , but seen after
> Ctrl-Alt-F1
> > disco
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2011 01:09:25 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > The KDE4 in FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 amd64 is generating enormous amount of
> error
> > messages during usage ( not visible on screen , but seen after Ctrl-
> Alt-F1
> > discontinu
On Thursday 27 October 2011 01:09:25 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> The KDE4 in FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 amd64 is generating enormous amount of
error
> messages during usage ( not visible on screen , but seen after Ctrl-
Alt-F1
> discontinuation of X ) . This is making it extremely slow which may be
> cons
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> The KDE4 in FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 amd64 is generating enormous amount of error
> messages during usage ( not visible on screen , but seen after Ctrl-Alt-F1
> discontinuation of X ) . This is making it extremely slow which may be
> cons
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>>
>> Also by Benjamin Kaduk :
>>>
>>>
>>> Has this computer successfully run other versions of FreeBSD with X?
>>> I seem t
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> Also by Benjamin Kaduk :
>>
>>
>> Has this computer successfully run other versions of FreeBSD with X?
>> I seem to recall there can be odd interactions with hald, xorg.conf, and
>> other
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Also by Benjamin Kaduk :
Has this computer successfully run other versions of FreeBSD with X?
I seem to recall there can be odd interactions with hald, xorg.conf, and
others. Some googling brings up
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/ae
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
>>
>> During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
>> keyboard and mouse are working .
>>
>> When a graphical desktop ( Fluxb
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
>>
>> During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
>> keyboard and mouse are working .
>>
>> When a graphical desktop ( Flu
Hi,
Just because I'd like to ensure this doesn't get lost, would you
please do an MBR install of 9.0-RELEASE on another disk, and then plug
that in as a slave to the 8.x install?
Do you have a USB<->SATA adapter, so you can attach the disk after boot?
What I think will help the developers;
* get
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
>>
>> During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
>> keyboard and mouse are working .
>>
>> When a graphical desktop ( Fluxb
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
keyboard and mouse are working .
When a graphical desktop ( Fluxbox , Gnome , or KDE ) is started , both of
them are becoming frozen .
De
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 .
During installation and boots , and ( as root ) console mode , both USB
keyboard and mouse are working .
When a graphical desktop ( Fluxbox , Gnome , or KDE ) is started , both of
them are becoming frozen .
De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/23/11 2:20 PM, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Ken Smith
> wrote:
>>
>> The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
>>
>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0-TODO
>>
>
> link error, need http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0-TODO
>
link error, need http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO
still no actual information on this page. Branch status not actual.
__
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Greg Miller wrote:
> On 10/22/11, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> The first of the Release Candidate builds of the 9.0-RELEASE release
>> cycle is now available. Since this is the first release of a brand
>
> New in RC1, with GENERIC:
Was r226041 MFCed properly?
-Garret
On 10/22/11, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> The first of the Release Candidate builds of the 9.0-RELEASE release
> cycle is now available. Since this is the first release of a brand
New in RC1, with GENERIC:
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
-std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredunda
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02:42AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:39:24AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I have upgraded my desktop from 8.2-stable to 9.0-RC1 (from source), using
> > a GENERIC kernel. I have installed the smartmontools-5.41_3 package from
> > a m
Op di 18 okt 2011 09:39:24 schreef John Hay:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have upgraded my desktop from 8.2-stable to 9.0-RC1 (from source), using
> a GENERIC kernel. I have installed the smartmontools-5.41_3 package from
> a mirror and found that smartmontools does not like the ada devices anymore.
> Previou
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:39:24AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have upgraded my desktop from 8.2-stable to 9.0-RC1 (from source), using
> a GENERIC kernel. I have installed the smartmontools-5.41_3 package from
> a mirror and found that smartmontools does not like the ada devices anymo
On 10/12/2011 06:47, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:39 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
>> On 29/09/2011 02:42, Ken Smith wrote:
>>> MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-bootonly.iso) =
>>> 2ce7b93d28fd7ff37965893f1af3f7fc
>>> MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-dvd1.iso) = 4affc701f2052edc548274f090e49235
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:39 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 29/09/2011 02:42, Ken Smith wrote:
> > MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-bootonly.iso) =
> > 2ce7b93d28fd7ff37965893f1af3f7fc
> > MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-dvd1.iso) = 4affc701f2052edc548274f090e49235
> > MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-memstick
On 29/09/2011 02:42, Ken Smith wrote:
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-bootonly.iso) = 2ce7b93d28fd7ff37965893f1af3f7fc
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-dvd1.iso) = 4affc701f2052edc548274f090e49235
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-memstick.img) = e260f2f2122326cb9a93ac83eb006c1c
The -dvd1.iso files seem to
Hi!
There is an open pr on this bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=gnu/93629
2011/10/11 Dimitry Andric :
> On 2011-10-11 11:44, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>> On my lab's server, a FreeBSD 9 box (9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #40
>> r226245: Tue Oct 11 10:01:29 CEST 2011), I receive for so
On 2011-10-11 11:44, O. Hartmann wrote:
On my lab's server, a FreeBSD 9 box (9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #40
r226245: Tue Oct 11 10:01:29 CEST 2011), I receive for some ports while
compiling this error:
Abort trap (core dumped)
Assertion failed: (mblength != (size_t)-1&& mblength != (size_t)-2)
On 4 October 2011 19:40, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
>>
>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO
>>
>> though the schedule listed there is still way off. We'll re-work the
>> schedule some
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
>>
>> Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, BETA-2 have been
>> released, no date set.
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Vlad Galu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Had you loved so much to have this information, you
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
>>> me credential.
>>>
>>> I may have filled i
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
>>> me credential.
>>>
>>> I may have fill
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
>> me credential.
>>
>> I may have filled in all the date from publicly available material,
>> might it be fro
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
>>
>> Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, BETA-2 have been
>> released, no date set.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
>
> Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, BETA-2 have been
> released, no date set. stable/9 has been created, no date set.
> Branch status has not
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO
>> >
>> > though
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
>
> The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO
>
> though the schedule listed there is still way off. We'll re-work the
> schedule some time soon.
>
Last updated: 16 August 2011. :(
___
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> > The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
> >
> >http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO
> >
> > though the schedule listed there is still way off. We'll re-work the
>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> What is your Wiki name?
>
"ArnaudLacombe"
created this morning, with the same email address as the one I'm
sending this email with.
Thanks,
- Arnaud
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:41:50 +0200, Arnaud Lacombe
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 4 October 2011 16:35, Chris Rees wrote:
On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 4 October 2011 16:35, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> The third BETA build
What is your Wiki name?
On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
>>> available. Since this is t
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
>> available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
>> I cross-post the announcements on both
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
> available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
> I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable. But
> just so you know most of the developers
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 21:42 -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_8", if you use "." (head)
> you will get 10-CURRENT.
Sigh. Sorry. It's late...
RELENG_9...
--
Hi,
On 9/28/11 5:28 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
>
> and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64,
> but that was yesterday.
>
> I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64.
>
I've be
on 28/09/2011 00:59 Craig Rodrigues said the following:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 27/09/2011 02:02 Craig Rodrigues said the following:
>>> Is "camcontrol readcap" supposed to work for an ATA disk?
>>
>> Or, rephrased - is a SCSI command supposed to work for an AT
On 28/09/2011 10:28, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
>
> and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64,
> but that was yesterday.
>
> I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64.
Yup. The stab
2011/9/28 Thomas Mueller :
>
> I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
>
> and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64,
> but that was yesterday.
>
> I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64.
>
> Now the question is how to
I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64, but
that was yesterday.
I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64.
Now the question is how to update without trashing the BETA2 install
On Sep 28, 2011 7:15 AM, "Matt Thyer" wrote:
>
> On Sep 28, 2011 4:11 AM, "Nathan Whitehorn"
wrote:
> >
> > On 09/27/11 08:24, Matt Thyer wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >>>
> I suspect tha
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 27/09/2011 02:02 Craig Rodrigues said the following:
>> Is "camcontrol readcap" supposed to work for an ATA disk?
>
> Or, rephrased - is a SCSI command supposed to work for an ATA disk.
> I am sure that you know the answer.
>
> P.S. camcont
On Sep 28, 2011 4:11 AM, "Nathan Whitehorn" wrote:
>
> On 09/27/11 08:24, Matt Thyer wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>>
I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not FreeBSD.
>>>
>>>
>>> I've boote
On 09/27/11 08:24, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote:
On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not FreeBSD.
I've booted the drive successfully on an older Via C3 board.
I'm now watching it boot successful
on 27/09/2011 02:02 Craig Rodrigues said the following:
> Is "camcontrol readcap" supposed to work for an ATA disk?
Or, rephrased - is a SCSI command supposed to work for an ATA disk.
I am sure that you know the answer.
P.S. camcontrol, of course, can be extended to support the corresponding ATA
On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote:
>
> On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not FreeBSD.
>
> I've booted the drive successfully on an older Via C3 board.
>
> I'm now watching it boot successfully on a Gigabyte GA-8I915PC
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:06:53 + (GMT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
I see a thread, "FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems." and now am
curious about what is the current beta?
I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and
am
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running this version: 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #23 r225745:
>> Fri Sep 23 19:45:09 PDT 2011
>>
>> I found this behavior:
>> % camcontrol devlist
>>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> Surely the device ID in bus/target/LUN format should be 2:0:0 for the
> Seagate hard disk?
Ah, OK. Here is what I get now:
These are the devices, as shown in the dmesg.boot output:
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0
ada0: ATA-7
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running this version: 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #23 r225745:
> Fri Sep 23 19:45:09 PDT 2011
>
> I found this behavior:
> % camcontrol devlist
> at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0)
> at sc
.. because PCBSD 9.0 uses a FreeBSD partition inside an MBR/DOS
partition scheme, rather than GPT inside MBR/DOS.
Something tells me this is going to cause problems..
Adrian
On 26 September 2011 16:38, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. and as a side note, PCBSD 9.0-BETA2 USB install booted fine on the
.. and as a side note, PCBSD 9.0-BETA2 USB install booted fine on the
same machine (Although I needed a larger flash disk, as it's 100
megabytes larger than what my "4 gigabyte" USB flash drives
advertise.)
I'll try dumping FreeBSD on the same USB flash disk once PCBSD is
installed, just to elimin
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I've just tried to boot a FreeBSD-9.0 BETA2 (i386) memstick USB image
on my BIOS.
When inserted into a FreeBSD box (the one that I wrote it from), the
partition table has an MBR style partition setup with a single EFI
partition on it.
Also known as a "
On 26 September 2011 13:07, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I may not have been entirely clear. The Android and the BIOS in my laptop seem
> to have an issue. The Thunderbolt does not seem to block boot on other
> systems,
> just my T520.
Oh I understood that. It was this comment:
> I suspect that the
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not FreeBSD.
>
> I've booted the drive successfully on an older Via C3 board.
>
> I'm now watching it boot successfully on a Gigabyte GA-8I91
On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not FreeBSD.
I've booted the drive successfully on an older Via C3 board.
I'm now watching it boot successfully on a Gigabyte GA-8I915PC Duo board.
I'm going to try dumping a Linux distro on this U
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just tried to boot a FreeBSD-9.0 BETA2 (i386) memstick USB image
> on my BIOS.
>
> When inserted into a FreeBSD box (the one that I wrote it from), the
> partition table has an MBR style partition setup with a single EFI
> par
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:42:06 -0300
> schrieb Alisson :
>
>> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
>
>
> Judging from the schedule, it's at least a month late. If not two.
> Unsurprisingly, to me at least.
>
> Personally,
Am Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:42:06 -0300
schrieb Alisson :
> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
Judging from the schedule, it's at least a month late. If not two.
Unsurprisingly, to me at least.
Personally, I don't care. I don't plan with "future" releases
anyway, only with the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Alisson wrote:
> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/schedule.html
Remember that just because a date is in the schedule, doesn't make it
a hard date. So I don't know, but sometime soon, when it is ready.
Le 15/09/2011 16:42, Alisson a écrit :
> Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
> ___
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-curr
On 09/15/2011 16:42, Alisson wrote:
Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
When it is ready?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
Op 8 sep. 2011 om 19:00 heeft "Andrey V. Elsukov" het
volgende geschreven:
> On 08.09.2011 20:13, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> This however results in that I can not find any "normal" way in the
>> guided and expert config menus to actual tell it to use the whole disk
>> for a new fresh FreeB
On 08.09.2011 20:13, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> This however results in that I can not find any "normal" way in the
> guided and expert config menus to actual tell it to use the whole disk
> for a new fresh FreeBSD install.
>
> it keeps complaining
> Operation not permitted
> 'ada0 table
On 09/08/11 08:15, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 8 September 2011 02:27, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Watching the ncpu number, I realized that FreeBSD is limited to 64
processors.
Some vendors offer now 4-socket Intel Xeon E7-4870 systems. This
"Westmere"
based CPU has 10 physical and 20 l
On 8 September 2011 02:27, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
> Watching the ncpu number, I realized that FreeBSD is limited to 64
> processors.
> Some vendors offer now 4-socket Intel Xeon E7-4870 systems. This
> "Westmere"
> based CPU has 10 physical and 20 logical cores, summa summarum 80
> cor
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
>
> Watching the ncpu number, I realized that FreeBSD is limited to 64
> processors.
> Some vendors offer now 4-socket Intel Xeon E7-4870 systems. This
> "Westmere"
> based CPU has 10 physical and 20 logical cores, summa summarum 80
>
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 07/09/2011 15:51, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> As before one of the many new features of 9.0 we would like tested
>> is the new installer, so fresh installs on test systems are encouraged.
>> The shift in the directory layout described above is in p
On 07/09/2011 15:51, Ken Smith wrote:
As before one of the many new features of 9.0 we would like tested
is the new installer, so fresh installs on test systems are encouraged.
The shift in the directory layout described above is in part due to
the new installer. FTP-based installs of BETA1 woul
2011/9/7 Andrey V. Elsukov :
> On 07.09.2011 04:21, Mikael Fridh wrote:
>> Hi gurus,
>>
>> FreeBSD freebsd9.mg8.tmtowtdi.se 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #0: Wed
>> Aug 31 18:07:44 UTC 2011
>> r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>>
>> When resizing a partition, on first a
On 07.09.2011 04:21, Mikael Fridh wrote:
> Resizing from any smaller size to a larger size initially uses up the
> whole disk, like if -s was not used at all even if it's as little as
> one logical disk block.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone else can reproduce.
Also, can you show the output of this c
On 07.09.2011 04:21, Mikael Fridh wrote:
> Hi gurus,
>
> FreeBSD freebsd9.mg8.tmtowtdi.se 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #0: Wed
> Aug 31 18:07:44 UTC 2011
> r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> When resizing a partition, on first attempt it uses up the whole disk.
>
On 08/13/11 18:30, Test Rat wrote:
Test Rat writes:
[...]
Remaking `cat'
Results of making cat:
clang -O2 -pipe -O3 -Qunused-arguments -fcolor-diagnostics
-march=native -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector
-Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parame
Test Rat writes:
[...]
> Remaking `cat'
> Results of making cat:
> clang -O2 -pipe -O3 -Qunused-arguments -fcolor-diagnostics
> -march=native -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector
> -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmis
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
