Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread George Kontostanos
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following: >> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this >> > affects ports/misc/compat8x/ >> >>

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following: > > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this > > affects ports/misc/compat8x/ > > Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough. >

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following: > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this > affects ports/misc/compat8x/ Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough. There is no direct relation between COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and misc/compat8x. CO

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread George Kontostanos
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote: > George Kontostanos schreef: > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andriy Gapon  wrote: >>> >>> on 13/01/2012 11:59 Doug Barton said the following: On 01/13/2012 01:52, George Kontostanos wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 13/01/2012 12:19 Doug Barton said the following: > On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no >> kernel incompatible changes were introduced? > > Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can > chan

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no > kernel incompatible changes were introduced? Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can change the various API/KPI/etc. in the newer branch. Doug --

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
George Kontostanos wrote: Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting! There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9 and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port rebuild. The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-30 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 30 October 2011 01:31:21 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I'm not sure what would load it automatically - it may be built into the > kernel though. Anyway, as you say it should work with ulpt loaded anyway. Hi, ulpt is autoloaded by /etc/devd/usb.conf --HPS

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-30 Thread David Marec
Le 30.10.2011 08:28, David Marec a écrit : >> I have a similar problem.. Le 30.10.2011 08:28, David Marec a écrit : >> I have a similar problem.. A new behavior occurs since I updated the world & kernel this morning. `devd` now executes the entry for hplip, as I defined it inside /usr/local/e

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-30 Thread David Marec
Le 30.10.2011 10:04, Jakub Lach a écrit : Or "just" extend hplip section in handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/printing-lpd-alternatives.html It should be a good idea, I agree. Especially in this case, where nobody now knows how and where HPLIP rights have to be settled. It co

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-30 Thread Jakub Lach
Or "just" extend hplip section in handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/printing-lpd-alternatives.html It could be roughly based upon this: http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/hplip.php -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Freebsd-9-amd64-USB-HPLIP-what-s-th

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-30 Thread Jakub Lach
It would be nice, If somebody would write updated manual documenting whole process of setting up hplip. In past, I could only get it to the point of printing test pages (sigh...) Before release preferably? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Freebsd-9-amd64-U

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-30 Thread David Marec
Le 29.10.2011 21:58, Jilles Tjoelker a écrit : > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote: >> So, what's should be the news group&user's rights required by HPLIP/cups >> on FreeBSD 9 ? > >> And, how to handle them with devd ? > > Use devfs rules. Doing this, device rights becom

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-30 Thread David Marec
Le 30.10.2011 01:31, Daniel O'Connor a écrit : On 30/10/2011, at 24:40, David Marec wrote: But, now running FreeBSD 9, I get new usb/devd behavior issues. First, the ulpt module is always loaded. Is there any elegant way to get rid of this 'self loading' behavior, except to remove it from /bo

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-29 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 30/10/2011, at 24:40, David Marec wrote: > But, now running FreeBSD 9, I get new usb/devd behavior issues. > > First, the ulpt module is always loaded. Is there any elegant way to get rid > of this 'self loading' behavior, except to remove it from /boot/modules ? > Anyway, it sounds like HPLI

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-29 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:58:53 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker a écrit : > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote: > > So, what's should be the news group&user's rights required by > > HPLIP/cups on FreeBSD 9 ? > > > And, how to handle them with devd ? > > Use devfs rules. > > Pastin

Re: [Freebsd 9] [amd64] [USB] [HPLIP] what's the (new) right way to manage hplip usb-plugged printers, running Freebsd 9

2011-10-29 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote: > So, what's should be the news group&user's rights required by HPLIP/cups > on FreeBSD 9 ? > And, how to handle them with devd ? Use devfs rules. Pasting from http://www.stack.nl/~jilles/unix/freebsd-devfs.txt Create or edit /etc/de

Re: FreeBSD 9: Fn+* keyboard combinations aren't working anymore.

2011-10-03 Thread arrowdodger
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM, matt wrote: > /usr/src/sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_asus.c > > Might be a good place to start? > > You can use 'acpidump -dt > acpidump.aml' to get a dump of the laptop's > acpi in the file acpidump.aml...This may allow you to determine what > changed, either in the a

Re: FreeBSD 9: Fn+* keyboard combinations aren't working anymore.

2011-10-03 Thread matt
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:49:44 +0400 arrowdodger <6year...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:44 PM, arrowdodger <6year...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lars Engels > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:30:25PM +0400, arrowdodger wrote: > >> > Hello.

Re: FreeBSD 9: Fn+* keyboard combinations aren't working anymore.

2011-10-02 Thread arrowdodger
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:44 PM, arrowdodger <6year...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lars Engels wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:30:25PM +0400, arrowdodger wrote: >> > Hello. I've used FreeBSD 8-STABLE on my Asus K40IN notebook. This >> notebook >> > has an key combi

Re: FreeBSD 9: Fn+* keyboard combinations aren't working anymore.

2011-09-28 Thread Lars Engels
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:30:25PM +0400, arrowdodger wrote: > Hello. I've used FreeBSD 8-STABLE on my Asus K40IN notebook. This notebook > has an key combination (Fn+F6/F7)to change monitor brightness. After i've > updated my system to 9-STABLE, these combinations stopped working. It's > worth men

Re: FreeBSD 9: Fn+* keyboard combinations aren't working anymore.

2011-09-28 Thread arrowdodger
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lars Engels wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:30:25PM +0400, arrowdodger wrote: > > Hello. I've used FreeBSD 8-STABLE on my Asus K40IN notebook. This > notebook > > has an key combination (Fn+F6/F7)to change monitor brightness. After i've > > updated my system t

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems

2011-09-28 Thread Attilio Rao
2011/9/27 crsnet.pl : >> Hi, > > Hello, thanks for reply. >> >> Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but >> build your wifi support as a module.) >> Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not. >> > First i make kldunload if_iwn. > When i try to suspend f

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems.

2011-09-27 Thread crsnet.pl
I'm not sure why the machine panics when you unload uhci - if you can get any more information about the panic then please open a PR. As for the issue with suspend/resume hanging, can you please try the patch at http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1106041548370.26975 and see if

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems

2011-09-27 Thread crsnet.pl
Hi, Hello, thanks for reply. Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but build your wifi support as a module.) Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not. First i make kldunload if_iwn. When i try to suspend from X, Xorg close, i see console and lapto

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems.

2011-09-27 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:40 +0200, crsnet.pl wrote: > Hello. > I upgrade my FreeBSD 8.2-Release to FreeBSD 9-Beta and pkg_delete -f -a > and add new (that same) pkgs with pkg_add. > And system, xorgs, wine, opera, java, flash works ok, but... > I find two things that dont works ;/ > > 1. Sus

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems.

2011-09-26 Thread Doug Barton
On 09/26/2011 16:02, crsnet.pl wrote: > >> 2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu. >> I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to >> Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/ >> Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11. >> I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But this doesn't help ;/ > >

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems

2011-09-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but build your wifi support as a module.) Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not. (And you haven't told us what your hardware is.) Adrian ___ freebsd-current@free

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems.

2011-09-26 Thread Glen Barber
[majority of CC'd lists removed...] On 9/26/11 7:02 PM, crsnet.pl wrote: > >> 2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu. >> I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to >> Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/ >> Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11. >> I try to use old gadulib, or recompi

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems.

2011-09-26 Thread crsnet.pl
2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu. I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/ Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11. I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But this doesn't help ;/ I run portmaster -y --no-confirm --packages-if-newer -m

Re: FreeBSD 9 + ZFS + MPS

2011-07-25 Thread Eric McCorkle
On 7/25/11 11:32 AM, Tim Gustafson wrote: I'm seeing some odd behavior on FreeBSD 9 with ZFS and an MPS controller. For two or three weeks, this configuration was working like a champ. It's a Bacula storage daemon server and was getting considerable usage - our backup set is in the multiple-te

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-07-09 Thread Michael Butler
On 07/09/11 22:14, Garrett Cooper wrote: A rather quick hack to get this to compile is attached; it is decidedly in need of more care .. Or you could try out http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158714 . It fixes ports/158266 too. Awesome - Thanks! imb _

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-07-09 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Michael Butler wrote: > On 07/01/11 13:10, Tim Gustafson wrote: > >> At any rate, 9 is working for now, except for the net-snmp compilation >> problem which I got around by using the binary package. > > A rather quick hack to get this to compile is attached; it is d

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-07-09 Thread Michael Butler
On 07/01/11 13:10, Tim Gustafson wrote: At any rate, 9 is working for now, except for the net-snmp compilation problem which I got around by using the binary package. A rather quick hack to get this to compile is attached; it is decidedly in need of more care .. imb *** ./agent/m

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-07-09 Thread Warner Losh
The latest FreeNAS images also have mps and zpool 28. Warner On Jul 1, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> More specifically, it's in 8.2-STABLE. mps driver was MFC'ed on >> Feb 18th, 2011. It didn't make it into 8.2-RELEASE. >> >> Try mfsBSD image from http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ -- it may wor

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-07-01 Thread Tim Gustafson
> More specifically, it's in 8.2-STABLE. mps driver was MFC'ed on > Feb 18th, 2011. It didn't make it into 8.2-RELEASE. > > Try mfsBSD image from http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ -- it may work better. That's what I used. I used the zpool 15 versions though; maybe the zpool 28 version had the new driver on

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-07-01 Thread Artem Belevich
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> it is nice that you give 9 a chance, but there is LSI SAS2008 support >> in 8.2, too. > > I tried booting off an 8.2 release disc and it did not see the controller. More specifically, it's in 8.2-STABLE. mps driver was MFC'ed on Feb 18th, 20

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-07-01 Thread Tim Gustafson
> it is nice that you give 9 a chance, but there is LSI SAS2008 support > in 8.2, too. I tried booting off an 8.2 release disc and it did not see the controller. I don't have a dmesg from booting off that disc so I can't offer much more detail other than what I have in my dmesg now: mps0: port

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-07-01 Thread Hendrik Hasenbein
On 30.06.2011 17:26, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed FreeBSD 9 on a new server because 8.2 doesn't have > support for the LSI SAS2008 controller. I've also built the system > as a ZFS-root box, and I have to say that I'm quite happy with the > disk performance: we're getting about 5

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-06-30 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 30.06.2011 21:40, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> I think you need something along the line of ifconfig_bce0_alias0="inet >> 1.2.3.5 netmask ...", >> notice the 'inet', since aliasN can be used for both inet and inet6. > > Got it, thanks! > > I assume that's also recommended for the primary interface

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-06-30 Thread Tim Gustafson
> Someone already filed a PR for this ( > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158266 ) and I'm > working on cleaning up the autoconf tests to work properly for $WORK > so we can upgrade to 5.6.1.1. > > The problem is caused by the recent netinet / net content shuffling > and the fact

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-06-30 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 2011-06-30 19:40, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> I think you need something along the line of >> ifconfig_bce0_alias0="inet 1.2.3.5 netmask ...", notice the >> 'inet', since aliasN can be used for both inet and inet6. > > Got it, thanks! > > I assume that's also recommended for the primary interface

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-06-30 Thread Tim Gustafson
> I think you need something along the line of > ifconfig_bce0_alias0="inet 1.2.3.5 netmask ...", notice the > 'inet', since aliasN can be used for both inet and inet6. Got it, thanks! I assume that's also recommended for the primary interface as well? I've added the "inet" prefix to both lines

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-06-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed FreeBSD 9 on a new server because 8.2 doesn't have support for > the LSI SAS2008 controller.  I've also built the system as a ZFS-root box, > and I have to say that I'm quite happy with the disk performance: we're >

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-06-30 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 30 June 2011 20:11, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-06-30 17:26, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've installed FreeBSD 9 on a new server because 8.2 doesn't have support >> for the LSI SAS2008 controller.  I've also built the system as a ZFS-root >> box, and I have to say that I'm quite ha

Re: FreeBSD 9

2011-06-30 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 2011-06-30 17:26, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed FreeBSD 9 on a new server because 8.2 doesn't have support for > the LSI SAS2008 controller. I've also built the system as a ZFS-root box, > and I have to say that I'm quite happy with the disk performance: we're > getting abou

Re: FreeBSD 9-CURRENT (and 8.0) on MacMini (rev. 3,1)

2010-04-04 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 04/04/2010 18:34 Phil Regnauld said the following: > Attilio Rao (attilio) writes: >> I would start by compiling a debugging kernel and using serial port >> for capturing, starting reporting the ACPI bug in the latest case, >> then we can get useful informations. > > Hi Attilio, > >

Re: FreeBSD 9-CURRENT (and 8.0) on MacMini (rev. 3,1)

2010-04-04 Thread Phil Regnauld
Attilio Rao (attilio) writes: > > I would start by compiling a debugging kernel and using serial port > for capturing, starting reporting the ACPI bug in the latest case, > then we can get useful informations. Hi Attilio, Any pointers on how to achieve that on a machine with no s

Re: FreeBSD 9-CURRENT (and 8.0) on MacMini (rev. 3,1)

2010-04-04 Thread Attilio Rao
2010/4/4 Phil Regnauld : > Hi everyone, > > Wasn't sure where to post this, so I'll try here as it involves -CURRENT > as well, and effort is probably best spent there. > > Have acquired a MacMini "Server" model (4 GB RAM, 2 x 500 GB disk, and > no optical drive) to build a workshop training server