Hi re@
cc stable@ & current@ etc,
Ref. my Fri Dec 27 15:25:57 UTC 2013
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-December/076604.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-December/047555.html
> Has someone checked src/ + ports/ has been re-made a seamless
> functi
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> The correct way to install/update ZFS Boot code on an MBR disk is:
>
> Install boot Manager (required on first install)
>
> # gpart bootcode -b /boot/boot0 ad0
>
> Note: /boot/mbr could also be used if you are not multibooting
>
> Install ZFS
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
>> +--On 27 décembre 2013 10:28:07 -0500 Thomas Hoffmann
>> wrote:
>> | All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has
>> | MBR (as I do) and assuming the following basic
On Friday, December 27, 2013 11:08:08 am Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> > +--On 27 décembre 2013 10:28:07 -0500 Thomas Hoffmann
> > wrote:
> > | All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has
> > | MBR (as I do) and assuming the follo
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:21:12PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> You *don't* need it after installworld, or freebsd-update install.
> You *only* need it if you *explicitly* run "zpool upgrade
> yourzpool".
Well, that was my point; by removing the need to ha
After I posted, it occurred to me to check out the
../bsdinstall/scripts/zfsboot script to see how the boot code was laid
down when the MBR was created. It shows only:
dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/ada0s1 count =1
But, adding to my confusion, the FreeBSD wiki for ZFS on root (MBR-style)
shows some
+--On 27 décembre 2013 10:17:14 -0600 "Matthew D. Fuller"
wrote:
| On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:33:23PM +0100 I heard the voice of
| Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
|>
|> All you have to do is adapt it to run your particular setup,
|> replacing da0 with the correct disk (and running it for e
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:33:23PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> All you have to do is adapt it to run your particular setup,
> replacing da0 with the correct disk (and running it for each disk
> where your pool is, in my case, it was mfid0 and mfid1.)
I've
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 27 décembre 2013 10:28:07 -0500 Thomas Hoffmann
wrote:
| All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has
| MBR (as I do) and assuming the following basic scheme:
|
| gpart show ada0
| => 63 976773105 ada0 MBR (46
+--On 27 décembre 2013 10:28:07 -0500 Thomas Hoffmann
wrote:
| All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has
| MBR (as I do) and assuming the following basic scheme:
|
| gpart show ada0
| => 63 976773105 ada0 MBR (466G)
| 63 976773105 1 freebsd
All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has MBR
(as I do) and assuming the following basic scheme:
gpart show ada0
=> 63 976773105 ada0 MBR (466G)
63 976773105 1 freebsd [active] (466G)
gpart show ada0s1
=>0 976773105 ada0s1 BSD (
> The third RC build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
Nice :-)
Has someone checked src/ + ports/ has been re-made a seamless
functional combination for named/bind ? There were various loose
ends earlier (paths, defaults etc), after removal from src/.
I'm asking as I think I wil
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:25:21AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> [...]
> Pre-installed virtual machine images for 10.0-RC3 are also available
> for amd64 and i386 architectures.
>
> The images are located under the 'snapshots' directory on FTP, here:
>
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapsh
+--On 27 décembre 2013 12:26:49 +0100 Zenny wrote:
| On 12/27/13, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|> +--On 27 décembre 2013 00:42:36 +0100 Zenny
|> wrote:
|> | Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from
|> | the earlier version bork in case of ZFS on Root? Or is there a safe
|> |
On 12/27/13, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 27 décembre 2013 00:42:36 +0100 Zenny wrote:
> | Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from
> | the earlier version bork in case of ZFS on Root? Or is there a safe
> | way to upgrade without borking. I had a very bad experience
+--On 27 décembre 2013 00:42:36 +0100 Zenny wrote:
| Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from
| the earlier version bork in case of ZFS on Root? Or is there a safe
| way to upgrade without borking. I had a very bad experience when I
| upgraded from FreeBSD-10B3 to RC1.
Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from
the earlier version bork in case of ZFS on Root? Or is there a safe
way to upgrade without borking. I had a very bad experience when I
upgraded from FreeBSD-10B3 to RC1. Thanks!
On 12/26/13, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26,
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 04:17:27PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
> I take it that building world and kernel from source should present no
> problems, right?
> Is the latest CLang at 3.5 being used or will I need to "hack" the Makefile
> in /usr/ports/lang to build it?
Both world and kernel are built wit
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> The third RC build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
> on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
> sparc64 architectures.
>
> The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
>
> ISO images and,
19 matches
Mail list logo
