Take a look at http://quake.nyct.net/~efutch/FreeBSD/ftpio.c.patch-3 and
let me know if this is what you want. Really it's such a stupid problem
that not patching it wouldn't make sense.
--
Eric Futch New York Connect.Net, Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Technical Support Staff
http:
"Eric D. Futch" wrote:
> [snippets deleted]
> You can see how they differ in handling FTP_PASSIVE_MODE.
>
> Someone (sorry I can't remember your name :)) suggested a better
> way of doing the if... take a look at:
> http://quake.nyct.net/~efutch/FreeBSD/ftpio.c.patch-2
Actually that is wrong, a
Maybe I didn't make it clear enough that fetch(1), and others uknown to
me, that use libftpio behave differently than ftp(1). I could imagine that
the current behaviour would cause confusion since ftp(1) checks the value
of FTP_PASSIVE_MODE and acts appropriately and programs using
libftpio do not
"Eric D. Futch" wrote:
>
>
> Please take a look at the PR I put together bin/18103 and let me know if
> this is a good (enough) fix for the problem.
>
> The patch can aslo be found at:
> http://quake.nyct.net/~efutch/FreeBSD/ftpio.c.patch
Looking at the patch, the only mod I would suggest is to
