> >> This is dangerous for the OSM. When the i2o OSM shuts an IOP
> >> down, it is history. It will stop doing any work at all; network,
> >> disk, console, mouse, whatever. I reserve that for really, really
> >> shutdown/reset.
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "dangerous".
On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote:
...
>> This is dangerous for the OSM. When the i2o OSM shuts an IOP
>> down, it is history. It will stop doing any work at all; network,
>> disk, console, mouse, whatever. I reserve that for really, really
>> shutdown/reset.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> > On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote:
> > >> Sorry to bother y'll, but;
> > >>
> > >> Has anyone ever used that? I see no trace of any kernel
> > >> code calling it, and the at_shutdown code appears to be
> > >> gone.
> > >
> > > It's still used in the s
Simon Shapiro wrote:
>
> On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote:
> >> Sorry to bother y'll, but;
> >>
> >> Has anyone ever used that? I see no trace of any kernel
> >> code calling it, and the at_shutdown code appears to be
> >> gone.
> >
> > It's still used in the shutdown code; it was meant to be ava
>
> On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote:
> >> Sorry to bother y'll, but;
> >>
> >> Has anyone ever used that? I see no trace of any kernel
> >> code calling it, and the at_shutdown code appears to be
> >> gone.
> >
> > It's still used in the shutdown code; it was meant to be available for
> > gener
On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote:
>> Sorry to bother y'll, but;
>>
>> Has anyone ever used that? I see no trace of any kernel
>> code calling it, and the at_shutdown code appears to be
>> gone.
>
> It's still used in the shutdown code; it was meant to be available for
> general use elsewhere, bu
Correction to the below message;
Figured it out all by myself :-)
Thanx!
On 10-May-00 Simon Shapiro wrote:
> Sorry to bother y'll, but;
>
> Has anyone ever used that? I see no trace of any kernel
> code calling it, and the at_shutdown code appears to be
> gone.
>
> BTW, for all it is worth,
> Sorry to bother y'll, but;
>
> Has anyone ever used that? I see no trace of any kernel
> code calling it, and the at_shutdown code appears to be
> gone.
It's still used in the shutdown code; it was meant to be available for
general use elsewhere, but I haven't seen anyone playing with it, so
