On Fri, 7 May 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> :--- uthread_create.c 1999/03/23 05:07:55 1.12
> :> :+++ uthread_create.c 1999/05/06 15:27:33
> :> :@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
> :> : #include "pthread_private.h"
> :> : #include "libc_private.h"
> :> :
> :> :+static int next_tid = 1;
> :> :+
>
:> :--- uthread_create.c1999/03/23 05:07:55 1.12
:> :+++ uthread_create.c1999/05/06 15:27:33
:> :@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
:> : #include "pthread_private.h"
:> : #include "libc_private.h"
:> :
:> :+static int next_tid = 1;
:> :+
:> : int
:> : pthread_create(pthread_t * thread, const pt
On Fri, 7 May 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :--- uthread_create.c 1999/03/23 05:07:55 1.12
> :+++ uthread_create.c 1999/05/06 15:27:33
> :@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
> : #include "pthread_private.h"
> : #include "libc_private.h"
> :
> :+static int next_tid = 1;
> :+
> : int
> : pthread_create(pthread_t
Matthew Dillon once wrote:
> Hmmm. tid is only an int and some programs which create and destroy
> threads a lot are almost certainly going to overflow it. 4 billion
> is not hard to reach. This can result in duplicate tid's.
Unsigned will double that. Not enough either?
:--- uthread_create.c 1999/03/23 05:07:55 1.12
:+++ uthread_create.c 1999/05/06 15:27:33
:@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
: #include "pthread_private.h"
: #include "libc_private.h"
:
:+static int next_tid = 1;
:+
: int
: pthread_create(pthread_t * thread, const pthread_attr_t * attr,
: void
