÷ Wed, 09.10.2002, × 16:23, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> >
> > > What I meant in my previous mail is that you could malloc() these
> > > objects instead of putting them on the stack. Also, you don't need
> > > buffers that big sinc
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> >
> > > What I meant in my previous mail is that you could malloc() these
> > > objects instead of putting them on the stack. Also, you don't need
> > > buffers that big since the size
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
>
> > What I meant in my previous mail is that you could malloc() these
> > objects instead of putting them on the stack. Also, you don't need
> > buffers that big since the size you need is bounded at max(sizeof(int),
> > TOK_STRING
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> What I meant in my previous mail is that you could malloc() these
> objects instead of putting them on the stack. Also, you don't need
> buffers that big since the size you need is bounded at max(sizeof(int),
> TOK_STRING_SIZE), which is likely to be T
Maxime Henrion wrote:
[...]
> > > > - There is a TOK_STRING_SIZE macro which defines the size of the the
> > > > db_tok_string variable. Use it instead of declaring several 1k
> > > > variables on the stack.
> > >
> > > It is not token buffers - it is buffers for sysctl data interchange,
> >
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> ? Wed, 09.10.2002, ? 01:03, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov ???:
> > ? Tue, 08.10.2002, ? 22:25, Maxime Henrion ???:
> > > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface
÷ Wed, 09.10.2002, × 01:03, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> ÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface
> > [...]
> >
> > Looks like this would be ve
÷ Wed, 09.10.2002, × 10:17, Bruce Evans ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On 08-Oct-2002 Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov wrote:
> > > ÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> > >> - I'm not sure if using the context of the init process to do sysctl
> > >> calls i
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 08-Oct-2002 Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov wrote:
> > ÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> >> - I'm not sure if using the context of the init process to do sysctl
> >> calls is the right way to go. However, it is not very clear what yo
On 08-Oct-2002 Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov wrote:
> ÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
>> Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface
>> [...]
>>
>> Looks like this would be very useful. I have
÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface
> [...]
>
> Looks like this would be very useful. I have a few comments, mainly
> about style though.
Attached fixed
VERY COOL!
On 8 Oct 2002, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface
>
> sysctl - read sysctl value
> sysctlw - write sysctl value
>
> Example:
>
> Translate string to sysctl MIB:
>
> db> sysctlw 0.3 hw\.model
>
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface
[...]
Looks like this would be very useful. I have a few comments, mainly
about style though.
- There is a TOK_STRING_SIZE macro which defines the size of the the
db_tok_strin
13 matches
Mail list logo
