On 11/20/2015 11:28 AM, Dan Partelly wrote:
A template for blackmailing is usually in the form:
"I will do this (usually involving saving the world and/or your
evidently miserable life) but first you will have to do this
(unrelated) thing to see that you are worthy.”
It is interesting how mu
> A template for blackmailing is usually in the form:
>
> "I will do this (usually involving saving the world and/or your
> evidently miserable life) but first you will have to do this
> (unrelated) thing to see that you are worthy.”
It is interesting how much you dwell on this. I just told you
On 11/20/15 08:54, Dan Partelly wrote:
Hi Pedro,
I think you confuse blackmailing with something much simpler and pragmatic.
One needs to asses how things work in your project for real before investing
too much time.
A template for blackmailing is usually in the form:
"I will do this (usua
Hi Pedro,
I think you confuse blackmailing with something much simpler and pragmatic.
One needs to asses how things work in your project for real before investing
too much time.
Adrian was contemplating the fact that none writes code, so I had some code at
the
hand with with I can see how th
[snip snip snippety snip]
Hi Dan!
Yeah, turns out trying to get a bunch of burnt out, time-poor
developers with commit bits to commit stuff will typically end up with
(a) things getting neglected, or (b) getting you a commit bit. :)
Please grab the patch from pedro (which I reviewed, and it look
On 19-11-2015 15:29, Dan Partelly wrote:
>> Unlike what you suggest here, I see lots of issues in Bugzilla which
>> exactly what you describe: enhancements on already available tools.
>> I've even submitted a few myself.
>
> Thats great Willem.
>
> But no matter what you find odd or not, I am si
Hi Pedro,
Sure, no worries , I am grateful for all you did, couldn't ask for more.
I have yet no idea how the projects works, but in the thread in which I
questioned the wisdom of having
utilities in base spitting out JSON -- instead of properly libyifing some
utilities -- Adrian has
stated so
> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 04:57, Dan Partelly
> ha scritto:
>
> Hey Pedro,
>
> Thanks a lot , mate.
>
> I’m reluctant to put it up as a PR, since some PR are outstanding for years.
>
Well, that’s the way the project works: you cannot really depend on me, or
anyone else keeping ol
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Dan Partelly wrote:
>> Unlike what you suggest here, I see lots of issues in Bugzilla which
>> exactly what you describe: enhancements on already available tools.
>> I've even submitted a few myself.
>
> Thats great Willem.
>
> But no matter what you find odd or no
> Unlike what you suggest here, I see lots of issues in Bugzilla which
> exactly what you describe: enhancements on already available tools.
> I've even submitted a few myself.
Thats great Willem.
But no matter what you find odd or not, I am simply following what Ive read on
some
page on freeb
On 19-11-2015 14:53, Dan Partelly wrote:
>> So not submitting a PR for an issue sound real strange to my ears.
>
>
> It is NOT a patch for an issue, bug, anything on those lines at all.
> It adds new features to DDB. Specifically it adds relational
> operators.
>
> Since it doesn't solve any
> So not submitting a PR for an issue sound real strange to my ears.
It is NOT a patch for an issue, bug, anything on those lines at all.
It adds new features to DDB. Specifically it adds relational
operators.
Since it doesn't solve any problems, I don't see why it should be added
to a prob
On 19-11-2015 10:57, Dan Partelly wrote:
> Hey Pedro,
>
> Thanks a lot , mate.
>
> I’m reluctant to put it up as a PR, since some PR are outstanding for
> years.
What a strange argument
Some PR's are fixed within hours/days
Letting it linger in your mailbox after mental evaluation is no
Hey Pedro,
Thanks a lot , mate.
I’m reluctant to put it up as a PR, since some PR are outstanding for years.
Adrian,
since Pedro has issue with hardware, could you try the patch and give a
resolution on it ? I reviewed it mentally (no FreeBSD atm machine on which I
could actually patch th
Hello;
> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly
> ha scritto:
>
> Hey Pedro,
>
> some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in which I added relational
> ops support from it. The patch was a bit clobbered,
> but last I know you cleaned it up and put it somewhere on freebsd.
15 matches
Mail list logo
