Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-20 Thread Edwin L. Culp
Quoting David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:23:55PM -0800, Edwin L. Culp wrote: > > It would really be nice to have this committed, if it doesn't break > > anything, to not have to be patching every time. > > It will be. I am waiting a responce back from someone. Bu

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:23:55PM -0800, Edwin L. Culp wrote: > It would really be nice to have this committed, if it doesn't break > anything, to not have to be patching every time. It will be. I am waiting a responce back from someone. But one way or another it will be fixed -- I run two K6-

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-20 Thread Wm Brian McCane
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Pierre Beyssac wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:30:12AM +0100, Pascal Hofstee wrote: > > AMD K6-2 350 > > > > I noticed the vague stack smashes posting earlier ... and i think it's very > > likely this is the same bug > > Same here, random crashes -- AMD K6-2 300; no pan

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-20 Thread Edwin L. Culp
Quoting Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Edwin L. Culp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My old K6-2 laptop has this problem and the patch seemed to fix the > > crashes that I was experiencing under almost minimal load. The down > > side is that it also brought me a pccard or DEVFS prob

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Edwin L. Culp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One of the error messages was that card0 didn't exist in /dev That's pccard stuff, not your network driver. Did you check to see that the pccard bridge was probed and attached? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mai

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-20 Thread Edwin L. Culp
Quoting Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Edwin L. Culp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My old K6-2 laptop has this problem and the patch seemed to fix the > > crashes that I was experiencing under almost minimal load. The down > > side is that it also brought me a pccard or DEVFS prob

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Edwin L. Culp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My old K6-2 laptop has this problem and the patch seemed to fix the > crashes that I was experiencing under almost minimal load. The down > side is that it also brought me a pccard or DEVFS problem so no > network. Uh, no. There's no way this patch ca

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-20 Thread Edwin L. Culp
My old K6-2 laptop has this problem and the patch seemed to fix the crashes that I was experiencing under almost minimal load. The down side is that it also brought me a pccard or DEVFS problem so no network. Of course that could have been caused by out-of-sync kernel and sources due to all the c

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Mar-01 Pierre Beyssac wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:16:00PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Try this workaround (apply with 'patch -l'): >> >> Here's a better workaround. Revert the previous patch and apply this >> one: > > O

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:19:02PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote: > Ok, thanks, note that your previous patch works fine, at least my > make world is still running :-) Famous last words; I had a freeze soon afterwards. Though it seems to have improved the situation quite a bit. Now running another

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:16:00PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Try this workaround (apply with 'patch -l'): > > Here's a better workaround. Revert the previous patch and apply this > one: Ok, thanks, note that your previous patch works

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Try this workaround (apply with 'patch -l'): Here's a better workaround. Revert the previous patch and apply this one: Index: npx.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c,v

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:30:12AM +0100, Pascal Hofstee wrote: > > I noticed the vague stack smashes posting earlier ... and i think it's very > > likely this is the same bug > Same here, random crashes -- AMD K6-2 300; no panic, no crash dump, > just

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:30:12AM +0100, Pascal Hofstee wrote: > AMD K6-2 350 > > I noticed the vague stack smashes posting earlier ... and i think it's very > likely this is the same bug Same here, random crashes -- AMD K6-2 300; no panic, no crash dump, just a complete system freeze if you ha

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-18 Thread Pascal Hofstee
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:00:08AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > With a CURRENT build/installworld from yesterday ... i get a VERY unstable > > system that page faults under the slightest CPU load (e.g. playing MP3's) > > What kind of CPU? AMD

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With a CURRENT build/installworld from yesterday ... i get a VERY unstable > system that page faults under the slightest CPU load (e.g. playing MP3's) What kind of CPU? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA