On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 09:02, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> ...
> > That's actually rather scary. It implies that a freshly checked out
> > tree checked out with plain 'cvs co src' is no longer buildable.
>
> c'mon... it is not that terrib
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
...
> That's actually rather scary. It implies that a freshly checked out
> tree checked out with plain 'cvs co src' is no longer buildable.
c'mon... it is not that terrible, just a matter of adding a -P flag
luigi
To Uns
Luigi Rizzo writes:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:47:26AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> >
> > The same thing happened to me when buildworlding on a ~june 20th
> > current box.
>
> Ruslan explained me the source of the problem... cvs does not
> prune empty directories unless you specify
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:47:26AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> The same thing happened to me when buildworlding on a ~june 20th
> current box.
Ruslan explained me the source of the problem... cvs does not
prune empty directories unless you specify a revision or a date.
In my case i wanted
The same thing happened to me when buildworlding on a ~june 20th
current box.
I removed CPUTYPE from /etc/make.conf, and I fsck'ed the disk in
question (after a crash resulting from the condvar problem discussed
here). And I removed -j4 from my make flags. One of these things
(sorry that I don
I think it may just be my-bad. The kernel source got out of sync
with the main tree. I just cvs updated the whole smelly pot and
buildworld works just fine.
Sorry for the false alarm!
-Matt
:
:At 1:15 PM -0800 3/6/02, Matthew Dil
At 1:15 PM -0800 3/6/02, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> This has been broken for several days now, maybe longer. It
> would be nice if whoever broke it would fix it.
Is this in a 'make buildworld' step? I just did one buildworld
on i386, and it completed fine (src is cvsup'ed as of about noon)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:07:46AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:59:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Nope, you please try to restructure it along the lines of
> > src/usr.bin/xinstall/Makefile rev 1.16.
>
> I'll consider it.
>
> > Also, won't it be better to use t
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:59:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Nope, you please try to restructure it along the lines of
> src/usr.bin/xinstall/Makefile rev 1.16.
I'll consider it.
> Also, won't it be better to use the libc version of basename.c?
Maybe, but I do not want more cross-tree sour
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:08:01PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:33:09PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak
> > the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in
> > the near future.
>
> Please tr
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:33:09PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak
> the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in
> the near future.
Please try to restructure it along the lines of
src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/M
It's irrelevant. Your 5.0-CURRENT wasn't actually "current".
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:22:54AM -0500, Wm Brian McCane wrote:
> Actually, I was already at 5.0-CURRENT.
>
> FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (CHINA) #7: Thu May 10 05:25:14 CDT 2001
>
> - brian
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote
Actually, I was already at 5.0-CURRENT.
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (CHINA) #7: Thu May 10 05:25:14 CDT 2001
- brian
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak
> the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in
> the near
Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak
the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in
the near future.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Wm Brian McCane wrote:
> I am having problems doing a buildworld. When I run it, I get the
> following error:
>
> > There was a make(1) problem a couple of weeks back. Resup, make-and-install
> > make(1), and you should be OK.
> >
> > Dunno why, but ntp(d) tickled the bug.
>
> To be safe, I nuked the /usr/src/usr.bin/make tree and re-cvsup'ed so
> I'd checkout new-car-smell-fresh copies. I killed the /usr
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:54:20PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > > Any more ideas what to try here?
> >
> > I'm sure you already thought of this, but have you made sure that you
> > aren't running any memory-hogging applications? I just compiled all
> > the ntp programs on my laptop which is
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:54:20PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > Any more ideas what to try here?
>
> I'm sure you already thought of this, but have you made sure that you
> aren't running any memory-hogging applications? I just compiled all
> the ntp programs on my laptop which is a Pentium 75
> Any more ideas what to try here?
I'm sure you already thought of this, but have you made sure that you
aren't running any memory-hogging applications? I just compiled all
the ntp programs on my laptop which is a Pentium 75 with 24MB of
memory and 64MB of swap (I didn't do an entire buildworld;
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:37:43AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>
> > What is happening is that the system is killing off the make process
> > because it starts to swell up so much it consumes all swap. Here is
> > the dmesg,
>
> Were any bits of the compiler killed off? A new test snapshot of
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:37:43AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> What is happening is that the system is killing off the make process
> because it starts to swell up so much it consumes all swap. Here is
> the dmesg,
Were any bits of the compiler killed off? A new test snapshot of gcc
was recen
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:37:43AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>I'd really like to get this working so I can play with some kernel
>mods I made last week. Any ideas?
I've just finished building world and kernel with recent -CURRENT. Didn't
encounter any problem though.
% uname -a
FreeBSD dante
On 25 Feb 00, at 16:22, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> AFAIK, the last commit was over 4 hours ago. I'd say try again.
>
> Should find out myself in the next half-hour or so.
my build world just finished. no errors.
--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking for more work]
http://www.dv
At 10:07 AM 2/26/00 +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
>On 25 Feb 00, at 22:03, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> One of our two servers will not perform "buildworld"! Well, kernel stuff
>> should be on the newest track, I cvsup-dated them both today.
>>
>> After a short while making dependencies it stops with the
On 25 Feb 00, at 22:03, O. Hartmann wrote:
> One of our two servers will not perform "buildworld"! Well, kernel stuff
> should be on the newest track, I cvsup-dated them both today.
>
> After a short while making dependencies it stops with the following error:
[snip]
> I deleted /usr/src/cryp
24 matches
Mail list logo
