I have been experimenting with this, and have successfully packaged base. I
figured out that make packages would do that.
http://skynet.desktopbsd.net/packages/
I have been unable to figure out how to package the kernel yet. Is it possible
at this stage to do that with another command, or is
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:21:13PM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote:
> Forwarding this from freebsd-security in case anyone here can update us
> regarding the status of base packaging or has URLs for projects/release-pkg.
>
> Roger
>
Packaging base is happening here:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/pro
On 2015-12-18 18:21, Roger Marquis wrote:
>> > The plan is for 11 to have a fully packaged base system. There should
>> > be some information in developer summit reports on the wiki. The code
>> > is in projects/release-pkg.
>>
I have mostly complete code to make openssl in base 'private', it ju
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 03:21:13PM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote:
> Forwarding this from freebsd-security in case anyone here can update us
> regarding the status of base packaging or has URLs for projects/release-pkg.
>
> Roger
This is from the conversation Baptiste and I had over IRC a few days (o
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:10, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> P.S. How do you handle the packlist generation? The ports system
> doesn't automatically generate these things, as far as I can tell, and
> I didn't see anything that you've added to do this.
>
> My agenda, if you will, on this is to deal with
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Why would you want to package sbin? Where do you see this work going?
> What problems do you think this will solve? Doing things a top level
> directory at a time isn't very interesting, but since it looks like a
> demo, perhaps you could sketc
P.S. How do you handle the packlist generation? The ports system
doesn't automatically generate these things, as far as I can tell, and
I didn't see anything that you've added to do this.
My agenda, if you will, on this is to deal with:
upgrades: portupgrade can grok packages. If you had a
Why would you want to package sbin? Where do you see this work going?
What problems do you think this will solve? Doing things a top level
directory at a time isn't very interesting, but since it looks like a
demo, perhaps you could sketch out what the polishing you'd envision.
Warner
__
On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 11:28 am, Paul Richards wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 11:25, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
We have programs in the ports tree which use our bsd.*.mk
infrastructure. Will there be a problem if such a program gets
installed
from ports (will it try to register itself
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 12:09, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:28:31 +0100
> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > We have programs in the ports tree which use our bsd.*.mk
> > > infrastructure. Will there be a problem if such a program gets installed
> > > from ports
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:28:31 +0100
Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have programs in the ports tree which use our bsd.*.mk
> > infrastructure. Will there be a problem if such a program gets installed
> > from ports (will it try to register itself 2 times)?
>
> I don't know, have yo
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 11:25, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:27:03 +0100
> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > However, I suspect that a marginally better place to use these would be
> > > in the "make distribute" target that "make release" uses. This way, the
> >
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:27:03 +0100
Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, I suspect that a marginally better place to use these would be
> > in the "make distribute" target that "make release" uses. This way, the
> > files are already separated out into directory structures, and it
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 04:27 pm, Paul Richards wrote:
> >I was thinking of adding an option to install so it registers the file
> >in a plist rather than actually doing the install. A seperate "make
> >plist" target co
On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 04:27 pm, Paul Richards wrote:
I was thinking of adding an option to install so it registers the file
in a plist rather than actually doing the install. A seperate "make
plist" target could then be used as a helper target to automate the
generation of plists.
I
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:45, Mark Murray wrote:
> Paul Richards writes:
> > I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to
> > be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks
> > like this can definitely be made to work with just some tidying up and
Paul Richards writes:
> I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to
> be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks
> like this can definitely be made to work with just some tidying up and
> re-arranging of our existing make files. I've succesfu
Paul Richards wrote:
> I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to
> be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks
> like this can definitely be made to work with just some tidying up and
> re-arranging of our existing make files. I've succesfu
18 matches
Mail list logo
