Alfred Perlstein writes:
> > > > I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times
> > > > before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to
> > > > do something about it.
> > >
> > > Where is the update to malloc(9)? What about reallocf?
> >
> > Good points, thanks..
* Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 14:45] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein writes:
> > > I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times
> > > before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to
> > > do something about it.
> >
> > Where is the update to malloc(9)? Wh
Alfred Perlstein writes:
> > I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times
> > before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to
> > do something about it.
>
> Where is the update to malloc(9)? What about reallocf?
Good points, thanks.. try this one instead.
-Arc
* Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020311 22:00] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times
> before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to
> do something about it.
>
> Does anyone have problems with the attached patch? This patch adds
> re
