Kostik Belousov writes:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:58:56PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> Thank you for your comments.
>>
>> In my usage, it works good by the patch appended to this mail.
>
> The patch is probably a start in the right direction. But, it would be
> much better to install sys/i386/
On May 24, 2010, at 2:49 AM, pluknet wrote:
> On 24 May 2010 08:49, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to compile 32bit binary on amd64, but I met with the problem.
>> Could you teach me the best solution, please?
>>
>>
>> My environment is FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 18 12:01:2
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:58:56PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> In my usage, it works good by the patch appended to this mail.
The patch is probably a start in the right direction. But, it would be
much better to install sys/i386/include to e.g. /usr/include/machine
Thank you for your comments.
In my usage, it works good by the patch appended to this mail.
> On May 24, 2010, at 2:49 AM, pluknet wrote:
>
>> On 24 May 2010 08:49, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I want to compile 32bit binary on amd64, but I met with the problem.
>>> Could you teach m
On 24 May 2010 08:49, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to compile 32bit binary on amd64, but I met with the problem.
> Could you teach me the best solution, please?
>
>
> My environment is FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 18 12:01:26 JST 2010.
>
> I compiled and executed test.c as below o
