Re: ATA errors and AUTO_EOI

1999-12-21 Thread jack
Today Oliver Fromme wrote: > The comment in LINT about AUTO_EOI_2 sounds pretty suspicous, > so I never even tried it: "it works for some clones and some > integrated versions." That sounds to me like "it works on a > very limited set of hardware (and if you're lucky)." I've only got one out o

Re: ATA errors and AUTO_EOI

1999-12-21 Thread D. Rock
Oliver Fromme schrieb: > > Doug White wrote in list.freebsd-current: > > On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > It seems Dieter Rothacker wrote: > > > > The solution for me was to recompile the kernel without AUTO_EOI1 and > > > > AUTO_EOI2. > > > > > > Those options newer worked (

Re: ATA errors and AUTO_EOI

1999-12-21 Thread Oliver Fromme
Doug White wrote in list.freebsd-current: > On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > It seems Dieter Rothacker wrote: > > > The solution for me was to recompile the kernel without AUTO_EOI1 and > > > AUTO_EOI2. > > > > Those options newer worked (for me at least) reliably with anything

Re: ATA errors and AUTO_EOI

1999-12-21 Thread Doug White
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Dieter Rothacker wrote: > > > > Using the new board, I get "waiting for interrupt" errors, and the system > > freezes while trying to mount the disks (with kernel from 12/03) or the > > system freeezes before being able to detect the drives (w

Re: ATA errors and AUTO_EOI

1999-12-21 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Dieter Rothacker wrote: > > Using the new board, I get "waiting for interrupt" errors, and the system > freezes while trying to mount the disks (with kernel from 12/03) or the > system freeezes before being able to detect the drives (with kernel from > 12/20). > > The solution for me wa